Laboratory and Ambient Particle Density Determinations using Light Scattering in Conjunction with Aerosol Mass Spectrometry

A light scattering module has been integrated into the current AMS instrument. This module provides the simultaneous measurement of vacuum aerodynamic diameter (d va) and scattered light intensity (RLS) for all particles sampled by the AMS above ∼180 nm geometric diameter. Particle counting statistics and correlated chemical ion signal intensities are obtained for every particle that scatters light. A single calibration curve converts RLS to an optical diameter (d o). Using the relationship between d va and d o the LS-AMS provides a real-time, per particle measurement of the density of the sampled aerosol particles. The current article is focused on LS-AMS measurements of spherical, non-absorbing aerosol particles. The laboratory characterization of LS-AMS shows that a single calibration curve yields the material density of spherical particles with real refractive indices (n) over a range from 1.41 < n < 1.60 with an accuracy of about ±10%. The density resolution of the current LS-AMS system is also shown to be 10% indicating that externally mixed inorganic/organic aerosol distributions can be resolved. In addition to the single particle measurements of d va and RLS, correlated chemical ion signal intensities are obtained with the quadrupole mass spectrometer. A comparison of the particle mass derived from the physical (RLS and d va) and chemical measurements provides a consistency check on the performance of the LS-AMS. The ability of the LS-AMS instrument to measure the density of ambient aerosol particles is demonstrated with sample results obtained during the Northeast Air Quality Study (NEAQS) in the summer of 2004. †Also Margaret W. Kelly, Professor of Chemistry at Connecticut College, New London, Connecticut, USA.

[1]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Design, Modeling, Optimization, and Experimental Tests of a Particle Beam Width Probe for the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer , 2005 .

[2]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 2: Application to Combustion-Generated Soot Aerosols as a Function of Fuel Equivalence Ratio , 2004 .

[3]  A. Zelenyuk,et al.  Evaporation of water from particles in the aerodynamic lens inlet: an experimental study. , 2006, Analytical chemistry.

[4]  Alla Zelenyuk,et al.  Single Particle Laser Ablation Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometer: An Introduction to SPLAT , 2005 .

[5]  S. Kreidenweis,et al.  Comparisons of aerosol properties measured by impactors and light scattering from individual particles: refractive index, number and volume concentrations, and size distributions , 2002 .

[6]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Ambient aerosol sampling using the Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer , 2003 .

[7]  C. Stanier,et al.  An Algorithm for Combining Electrical Mobility and Aerodynamic Size Distributions Data when Measuring Ambient Aerosol Special Issue of Aerosol Science and Technology on Findings from the Fine Particulate Matter Supersites Program , 2004 .

[8]  John E. Brockmann,et al.  APS Response to Nonspherical Particles and Experimental Determination of Dynamic Shape Factor , 1990 .

[9]  D. Worsnop,et al.  Particle Morphology and Density Characterization by Combined Mobility and Aerodynamic Diameter Measurements. Part 1: Theory , 2004 .

[10]  H. Burtscher,et al.  In situ measurement of size and density of submicron aerosol particles , 1995 .

[11]  J. Wilson,et al.  Theoretical Analysis of the Performance of the TSI Aerodynamic Particle Sizer The Effect of Density on Response , 1988 .

[12]  K. Ehara,et al.  Measurement of density distribution of aerosol particles by successive classification of particles according to their mass and diameter , 1998 .

[13]  Daniel M. Murphy,et al.  Particle density inferred from simultaneous optical and aerodynamic diameters sorted by composition , 2004 .

[14]  Kenneth A. Smith,et al.  Development of an Aerosol Mass Spectrometer for Size and Composition Analysis of Submicron Particles , 2000 .

[15]  K. Prather,et al.  Extending ATOFMS measurements to include refractive index and density. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[16]  Kimberly A Prather,et al.  Recent advances in our understanding of atmospheric chemistry and climate made possible by on-line aerosol analysis instrumentation. , 2005, Analytical chemistry.

[17]  W. P. Kelly,et al.  Measurement of Particle Density by Inertial Classification of Differential Mobility Analyzer–Generated Monodisperse Aerosols , 1992 .

[18]  J. Seinfeld,et al.  Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics: From Air Pollution to Climate Change , 1997 .

[19]  Xin Wang,et al.  The Relationship between Mass and Mobility for Atmospheric Particles: A New Technique for Measuring Particle Density , 2002 .

[20]  Barbara J. Turpin,et al.  Species Contributions to PM2.5 Mass Concentrations: Revisiting Common Assumptions for Estimating Organic Mass , 2001 .

[21]  D. R. Worsnop,et al.  Density changes of aerosol particles as a result of chemical reaction , 2004 .

[22]  Alla Zelenyuk,et al.  From Agglomerates of Spheres to Irregularly Shaped Particles: Determination of Dynamic Shape Factors from Measurements of Mobility and Vacuum Aerodynamic Diameters , 2006 .

[23]  Daniel M. Murphy,et al.  Laser Ionization Mass Spectroscopy of Single Aerosol Particles , 1995 .

[24]  Stephan Borrmann,et al.  A New Time-of-Flight Aerosol Mass Spectrometer (TOF-AMS)—Instrument Description and First Field Deployment , 2005 .

[25]  P. Barber Absorption and scattering of light by small particles , 1984 .

[26]  A. Zelenyuk,et al.  High Precision Density Measurements of Single Particles: The Density of Metastable Phases , 2005 .

[27]  Yinon Rudich,et al.  The density of humic acids and humic like substances ( HULIS ) from fresh and aged wood burning and pollution aerosol particles , 2018 .

[28]  Glen Lesins,et al.  Stronger Constraints on the Anthropogenic Indirect Aerosol Effect , 2002, Science.

[29]  K. Prather,et al.  Real-time characterization of individual aerosol particles using time-of-flight mass spectrometry , 1994 .

[30]  Charles E. Kolb,et al.  Chase Studies of Particulate Emissions from in-use New York City Vehicles , 2004 .

[31]  K. Prather,et al.  Aerodynamic Particle Sizing versus Light Scattering Intensity Measurement as Methods for Real-Time Particle Sizing Coupled with Time-of-Flight Mass Spectrometry. , 1996, Analytical chemistry.

[32]  V. Ramanathan,et al.  Aerosols, Climate, and the Hydrological Cycle , 2001, Science.