How interdisciplinary is a given body of research

This article presents results to date produced by a team charged with evaluating the National Academies Keck Futures Initiative, a 15-year US$ 40 million program to facilitate interdisciplinary research in the United States. The team has developed and tested promising quantitative measures of the integration (I) and specialization (S) of research outputs, the former essential to evaluating the impact of the program. Both measures are based on Thomson-ISI Web of Knowledge subject categories. ‘I’ measures the cognitive distance (dispersion) among the subject categories of journals cited in a body of research. ‘S’ measures the spread of subject categories in which a body of research is published. Pilot results for samples from researchers drawn from 22 diverse subject categories show what appears to be a surprisingly high level of interdisciplinarity. Correlations between integration and the degree of co-authorship of selected bodies of research show a low degree of association. Copyright , Beech Tree Publishing.

[1]  R. Tijssen.  A quantitative assessment of interdisciplinary structures in science and technology: Co-classification analysis of energy research☆ , 1992 .

[2]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Tracking areas of strategic importance using scientometric journal mappings , 1994 .

[3]  Anthony Rj. Van Raan.  4. The Interdisciplinary Nature of Science: Theoretical Framework and Bibliometric-Empirical Approach , 2000 .

[4]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[5]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Coauthorship Patterns and Trends in the Sciences (1980-1998): A Bibliometric Study With Implications for Database Indexing and Search Strategies , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[6]  Lisa R Lattuca,et al.  Creating Interdisciplinarity: Grounded Definitions from College and University Faculty , 2003 .

[7]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Interdisciplinarity in science: A tentative typology of disciplines and research areas , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the SCI , 2005, Scientometrics.

[9]  D. T. Tomov,et al.  Comparative indicators of interdisciplinarity in modern science , 1996, Scientometrics.

[10]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  How relevant are local scholarly journals in global science? A case study of South Africa , 2006 .

[11]  A. Porter,et al.  Interdisciplinary research: meaning, metrics and nurture , 2006 .

[12]  Igor Podlubny,et al.  Towards a better list of citation superstars: compiling a multidisciplinary list of highly cited researchers , 2006, ArXiv.

[13]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  An item-by-item subject classification of papers published in multidisciplinary and general journals using reference analysis , 2006, Scientometrics.

[14]  E. Leahey,et al.  Gender Differences in Productivity , 2006 .

[15]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Diversity measures and network centralities as indicators of interdisciplinarity: Case studies in BionanoScience , 2007 .

[16]  Jan C. Schmidt,et al.  Towards a philosophy of interdisciplinarity , 2008, Poiesis Prax..