The SOS response: recent insights into umuDC-dependent mutagenesis and DNA damage tolerance.

Be they prokaryotic or eukaryotic, organisms are exposed to a multitude of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damaging agents ranging from ultraviolet (UV) light to fungal metabolites, like Aflatoxin B1. Furthermore, DNA damaging agents, such as reactive oxygen species, can be produced by cells themselves as metabolic byproducts and intermediates. Together, these agents pose a constant threat to an organism's genome. As a result, organisms have evolved a number of vitally important mechanisms to repair DNA damage in a high fidelity manner. They have also evolved systems (cell cycle checkpoints) that delay the resumption of the cell cycle after DNA damage to allow more time for these accurate processes to occur. If a cell cannot repair DNA damage accurately, a mutagenic event may occur. Most bacteria, including Escherichia coli, have evolved a coordinated response to these challenges to the integrity of their genomes. In E. coli, this inducible system is termed the SOS response, and it controls both accurate and potentially mutagenic DNA repair functions [reviewed comprehensively in () and also in ()]. Recent advances have focused attention on the umuD(+)C(+)-dependent, translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) process that is responsible for SOS mutagenesis (). Here we discuss the SOS response of E. coli and concentrate in particular on the roles of the umuD(+)C(+) gene products in promoting cell survival after DNA damage via TLS and a primitive DNA damage checkpoint.

[1]  Z. Livneh,et al.  The Mutagenesis Protein UmuC Is a DNA Polymerase Activated by UmuD′, RecA, and SSB and Is Specialized for Translesion Replication* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[2]  R. Woodgate,et al.  UmuC mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: purification and interaction with UmuD and UmuD'. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Chikahide Masutani,et al.  The XPV (xeroderma pigmentosum variant) gene encodes human DNA polymerase η , 1999, Nature.

[4]  P E Gibbs,et al.  A human homolog of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae REV3 gene, which encodes the catalytic subunit of DNA polymerase zeta. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Deoxycytidyl transferase activity of yeast REV1 protein , 1996, Nature.

[6]  M Ptashne,et al.  Mechanism of action of the lexA gene product. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  H. Echols,et al.  Fidelity mechanisms in DNA replication. , 1991, Annual review of biochemistry.

[8]  M. O’Donnell,et al.  Activity of the purified mutagenesis proteins UmuC, UmuD', and RecA in replicative bypass of an abasic DNA lesion by DNA polymerase III. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  R. Schaaper,et al.  The Base Substitution and Frameshift Fidelity ofEscherichia coli DNA Polymerase III Holoenzyme in Vitro * , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[10]  Jeffrey W. Roberts,et al.  Nature of the SOS-inducing signal in Escherichia coli. The involvement of DNA replication. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[11]  F. Galibert,et al.  New recA mutations that dissociate the various RecA protein activities in Escherichia coli provide evidence for an additional role for RecA protein in UV mutagenesis , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[12]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Fidelity and Processivity of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA Polymerase η* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[13]  J. Lemontt,et al.  Pathways of ultraviolet mutability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. II. The effect of rev genes on recombination. , 1971, Mutation research.

[14]  R. Scheuermann,et al.  UmuD mutagenesis protein of Escherichia coli: overproduction, purification, and cleavage by RecA. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[15]  J. W. Little LexA cleavage and other self-processing reactions , 1993, Journal of bacteriology.

[16]  Yanbin Zhang,et al.  The human REV1 gene codes for a DNA template-dependent dCMP transferase. , 1999, Nucleic acids research.

[17]  F. Larimer,et al.  The REV1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: isolation, sequence, and functional analysis , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[18]  G. Maenhaut-Michel,et al.  Mechanism of SOS-induced targeted and untargeted mutagenesis in E. coli. , 1985, Biochimie.

[19]  J. Courcelle,et al.  Recovery of DNA Replication in UV-IrradiatedEscherichia coli Requires both Excision Repair and RecF Protein Function , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[20]  Roger Woodgate,et al.  Roles of E. coli DNA polymerases IV and V in lesion-targeted and untargeted SOS mutagenesis , 2000, Nature.

[21]  J. Lemontt,et al.  Pathways of ultraviolet mutability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. I. Some properties of double mutants involving uvs9 and rev. , 1971, Mutation research.

[22]  Fenghua Yuan,et al.  Specificity of DNA Lesion Bypass by the Yeast DNA Polymerase η* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  A. Grossman,et al.  Localization of bacterial DNA polymerase: evidence for a factory model of replication. , 1998, Science.

[24]  J. W. Little,et al.  Autodigestion of lexA and phage lambda repressors. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Requirement of DNA Polymerase Activity of Yeast Rad30 Protein for Its Biological Function* , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[26]  T. Horii,et al.  Inhibition of Escherichia coli RecA coprotease activities by DinI , 1998, The EMBO journal.

[27]  F. Hanaoka,et al.  Xeroderma pigmentosum variant (XP‐V) correcting protein from HeLa cells has a thymine dimer bypass DNA polymerase activity , 1999, The EMBO journal.

[28]  R. Scheuermann,et al.  A separate editing exonuclease for DNA replication: the epsilon subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[29]  M. Radman,et al.  Ultraviolet reactivation and ultraviolet mutagenesis of λ in different genetic systems , 1971 .

[30]  G. Maenhaut-Michel,et al.  Role of RecA protein in untargeted UV mutagenesis of bacteriophage lambda: evidence for the requirement for the dinB gene. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  J. Battista,et al.  Dominant negative umuD mutations decreasing RecA-mediated cleavage suggest roles for intact UmuD in modulation of SOS mutagenesis. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  J. Sweasy,et al.  Recovery from ultraviolet light-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis requires umuDC gene products in recA718 mutant strains but not in recA+ strains of Escherichia coli. , 1987, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[33]  E. G. Frank,et al.  Targeting of the UmuD, UmuD', and MucA' mutagenesis proteins to DNA by RecA protein. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  G. Walker,et al.  The Escherichia coli SOS mutagenesis proteins UmuD and UmuD' interact physically with the replicative DNA polymerase. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[35]  G. Walker Skiing the black diamond slope: progress on the biochemistry of translesion DNA synthesis. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Gerhard Steinborn,et al.  Uvm mutants of Escherichia coli K12 deficient in UV mutagenesis. I. Isolation of uvm mutants and their phenotypical characterization in DNA repair and mutagenesis. , 1978 .

[37]  B. Bridges,et al.  Mutagenic DNA repair in Escherichia coli. XIX. On the roles of RecA protein in ultraviolet light mutagenesis. , 1991, Biochimie.

[38]  J. Wagner,et al.  The dinB gene encodes a novel E. coli DNA polymerase, DNA pol IV, involved in mutagenesis. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[39]  M. Yamada,et al.  Multiple pathways for SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: an overexpression of dinB/dinP results in strongly enhancing mutagenesis in the absence of any exogenous treatment to damage DNA. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[40]  K. McEntee,et al.  Purification of a Soluble UmuD′C Complex from Escherichia coli , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[41]  G. Walker,et al.  A Role for the umuDC Gene Products ofEscherichia coli in Increasing Resistance to DNA Damage in Stationary Phase by Inhibiting the Transition to Exponential Growth , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[42]  C. Kenyon,et al.  DNA-damaging agents stimulate gene expression at specific loci in Escherichia coli. , 1980, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[43]  J. Courcelle,et al.  recF and recR are required for the resumption of replication at DNA replication forks in Escherichia coli. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[44]  J. Epstein,et al.  Novel human and mouse homologs of Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA polymerase eta. , 1999, Genomics.

[45]  E. Koonin,et al.  Human and mouse homologs of Escherichia coli DinB (DNA polymerase IV), members of the UmuC/DinB superfamily. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[46]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  Efficient bypass of a thymine-thymine dimer by yeast DNA polymerase, Poleta. , 1999, Science.

[47]  S. Kowalczykowski,et al.  Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA Protein with LexA Repressor , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[48]  Robert E. Johnson,et al.  hRAD30 mutations in the variant form of xeroderma pigmentosum. , 1999, Science.

[49]  P. Foster,et al.  Presence of the dnaQ-rnh divergent transcriptional unit on a multicopy plasmid inhibits induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli , 1989, Journal of bacteriology.

[50]  Z. Livneh,et al.  Overproduction of the beta subunit of DNA polymerase III holoenzyme reduces UV mutagenesis in Escherichia coli , 1992, Journal of bacteriology.

[51]  C. Croce,et al.  A Human REV7 Homolog That Interacts with the Polymerase ζ Catalytic Subunit hREV3 and the Spindle Assembly Checkpoint Protein hMAD2* , 2000, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[52]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Damage inducible mutagenesis: recent insights into the activities of the Umu family of mutagenesis proteins. , 1996, Cancer surveys.

[53]  S. Sandler,et al.  Differential suppression of priA2::kan phenotypes in Escherichia coli K-12 by mutations in priA, lexA, and dnaC. , 1996, Genetics.

[54]  G. Walker,et al.  Interactions of Escherichia coli UmuD with activated RecA analyzed by cross-linking UmuD monocysteine derivatives , 1996, Journal of bacteriology.

[55]  F. Harmon,et al.  Interaction of Escherichia coli RecA Protein with LexA Repressor , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[56]  R. Scheuermann,et al.  Capacity of RecA protein to bind preferentially to UV lesions and inhibit the editing subunit (epsilon) of DNA polymerase III: a possible mechanism for SOS-induced targeted mutagenesis. , 1986, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[57]  Z. Kelman,et al.  DNA polymerase III holoenzyme: structure and function of a chromosomal replicating machine. , 1995, Annual review of biochemistry.

[58]  Jeffrey W. Roberts,et al.  Function of nucleoside triphosphate and polynucleotide in Escherichia coli recA protein-directed cleavage of phage lambda repressor. , 1981, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[59]  J. Sweasy,et al.  RecA protein of Escherichia coli has a third essential role in SOS mutator activity , 1990, Journal of bacteriology.

[60]  E. Witkin Thermal enhancement of ultraviolet mutability in a tif-1 uvrA derivative of Escherichia coli B-r: evidence that ultraviolet mutagenesis depends upon an inducible function. , 1974, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[61]  E. G. Frank,et al.  UmuD'(2)C is an error-prone DNA polymerase, Escherichia coli pol V. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[62]  Myron F. Goodman,et al.  The importance of repairing stalled replication forks , 2000, Nature.

[63]  K. McEntee,et al.  "Activated"-RecA protein affinity chromatography of LexA repressor and other SOS-regulated proteins. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[64]  M. Radman,et al.  Ultraviolet reactivation and ultraviolet mutagenesis of lambda in different genetic systems. , 1971, Virology.

[65]  G. Walker,et al.  Mutagenesis and more: umuDC and the Escherichia coli SOS response. , 1998, Genetics.

[66]  Z. Livneh,et al.  Highly mutagenic replication by DNA polymerase V (UmuC) provides a mechanistic basis for SOS untargeted mutagenesis. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  Z. Livneh,et al.  The mutagenesis proteins UmuD' and UmuC prevent lethal frameshifts while increasing base substitution mutations. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[68]  J W Little,et al.  Purified lexA protein is a repressor of the recA and lexA genes. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[69]  T. Ogi,et al.  Mutation enhancement by DINB1, a mammalian homologue of the Escherichia coli mutagenesis protein DinB , 1999, Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms.

[70]  T. Steitz,et al.  The structure of the E. colt recA protein monomer and polymer , 1992, Nature.

[71]  Jeffrey H. Miller,et al.  Specificity of mutagenesis resulting from the induction of the SOS system in the absence of mutagenic treatment , 1984, Cell.

[72]  R. Woodgate,et al.  Identification of additional genes belonging to the LexA regulon in Escherichia coli , 2000, Molecular microbiology.

[73]  R. Scheuermann,et al.  Identification of the epsilon-subunit of Escherichia coli DNA polymerase III holoenzyme as the dnaQ gene product: a fidelity subunit for DNA replication. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[74]  P. Caillet-Fauquet,et al.  Genetic control of the UV-induced SOS mutator effect in single- and double-stranded DNA phages. , 1990, Mutation research.

[75]  E. G. Frank,et al.  Biochemical basis of SOS-induced mutagenesis in Escherichia coli: reconstitution of in vitro lesion bypass dependent on the UmuD'2C mutagenic complex and RecA protein. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[76]  R. Schaaper,et al.  Genetic requirements and mutational specificity of the Escherichia coli SOS mutator activity , 1997, Journal of bacteriology.

[77]  G. Walker,et al.  A model for a umuDC-dependent prokaryotic DNA damage checkpoint. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[78]  R. Sussman,et al.  Relationship between cellular RecA protein concentration and untargeted mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. , 1986, Mutation research.

[79]  H. Shinagawa,et al.  RecA protein-dependent cleavage of UmuD protein and SOS mutagenesis. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[80]  R. Woodgate,et al.  A phenotype for enigmatic DNA polymerase II: a pivotal role for pol II in replication restart in UV-irradiated Escherichia coli. , 1999, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[81]  E. Witkin,et al.  Targeted and untargeted mutagenesis by various inducers of SOS functions in Escherichia coli. , 1979, Cold Spring Harbor symposia on quantitative biology.

[82]  E. Egelman,et al.  The LexA repressor binds within the deep helical groove of the activated RecA filament. , 1993, Journal of molecular biology.

[83]  J. Battista,et al.  RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for mutagenesis: mechanistic relationship between transcriptional derepression and posttranslational activation. , 1988, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[84]  Daniel G. Anderson,et al.  Reconstitution of an SOS Response Pathway Derepression of Transcription in Response to DNA Breaks , 1998, Cell.

[85]  R. Schaaper,et al.  Fidelity and Error Specificity of the α Catalytic Subunit of Escherichia coli DNA Polymerase III* , 1996, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[86]  C. Lawrence,et al.  Thymine-Thymine Dimer Bypass by Yeast DNA Polymerase ζ , 1996, Science.

[87]  M. Radman,et al.  Mechanism of ultraviolet-induced mutagenesis: extent and fidelity of in vitro DNA synthesis on irradiated templates. , 1978, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[88]  S. Sandler,et al.  Role of PriA in Replication Fork Reactivation inEscherichia coli , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[89]  Chikahide Masutani,et al.  Low fidelity DNA synthesis by human DNA polymerase-η , 2000, Nature.

[90]  J. F. Connaughton,et al.  Identification of a DinB/UmuC homolog in the archeon Sulfolobus solfataricus. , 1996, Mutation research.