Using Epistemic Network Analysis to Examine Discourse and Scientific Practice During a Collaborative Game

According to the National Research Council, the ability to collaboratively solve problems is of the utmost importance in scientific careers, yet students are not exposed to learning experiences that promote such expertise. Recent studies have found that interdependent roles used within collaborative mobile games are an effective way to scaffold collaborative problem solving. School Scene Investigators: The Case of the Mystery Powder, a collaborative mobile game, incorporated interdependent roles in order to foster collaborative problem solving and promote scientific practice. Using epistemic network analysis (ENA), this study examined the conversational discourse of game teams to determine what connections exist between communication responses, language style, and scientific practice. Data included audio transcripts of three teams that played through the game. Transcripts were qualitatively coded for five types of scientific practice aligned to the National Research Council framework for K-12 science education, three types of communication responses (accept/discuss/reject), and an emergent language style (communal). ENA revealed that students developed scientific practices during gameplay. ENA also identified engaged communication responses and communal language style as two types of collaborative discourse used within School Scene Investigators: The Case of the Mystery Powder that fostered key linkages to effective data analysis and interpretation.

[1]  E. Aronson.  The Jigsaw Classroom , 1978 .

[2]  M. Patton.  Qualitative research and evaluation methods , 1980 .

[3]  David W. Johnson.  Circles of learning: Cooperation in the classroom , 1986 .

[4]  Robert J. Stevens,et al.  The Cooperative Elementary School: Effects on Students’ Achievement, Attitudes, and Social Relations , 1995 .

[5]  P. Dillenbourg.  What do you mean by collaborative learning , 1999 .

[6]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[7]  Brigid Barron.  When Smart Groups Fail , 2003 .

[8]  David W. Shaffer,et al.  Epistemic frames for epistemic games , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Don Tapscott,et al.  Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything , 2006 .

[10]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  Planning Early for Careers in Science , 2006, Science.

[11]  J. Willis.  Foundations of Qualitative Research: Interpretive and Critical Approaches , 2007 .

[12]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Augmented Reality Simulations on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[13]  Kurt Squire,et al.  Mad City Mystery: Developing Scientific Argumentation Skills with a Place-based Augmented Reality Game on Handheld Computers , 2007 .

[14]  Samah Mansour,et al.  Multi-Players Role- Playing Educational Serious Games , 2008 .

[15]  Matthew J. Sharritt.  Forms of Learning in Collaborative Video Game Play , 2008, Res. Pract. Technol. Enhanc. Learn..

[16]  Sean C. Duncan,et al.  Scientific Habits of Mind in Virtual Worlds , 2008 .

[17]  Eric Klopfer,et al.  Augmented Learning: Research and Design of Mobile Educational Games , 2008 .

[18]  H. Gardner,et al.  Learning: Peering Backward and Looking Forward in the Digital Era , 2009 .

[19]  Elizabeth Bagley,et al.  Epistemic network analysis : a Prototype for 21 st Century assessment of Learning , 2009 .

[20]  M. Woolcock,et al.  Mixed Methods Assessment , 2009 .

[21]  Chris Dede,et al.  Affordances and Limitations of Immersive Participatory Augmented Reality Simulations for Teaching and Learning , 2009 .

[22]  Diane Ravitch,et al.  The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice Are Undermining Education , 2010 .

[23]  D. Meyer,et al.  Supporting Online Material Materials and Methods Som Text Figs. S1 to S6 References Evidence for a Collective Intelligence Factor in the Performance of Human Groups , 2022 .

[24]  Jesús Trespalacios,et al.  Collaboration, Engagement & Fun: How Youth Preferences in Video Gaming can Inform 21st Century Education , 2011 .

[25]  Z. Popovic,et al.  Crystal structure of a monomeric retroviral protease solved by protein folding game players , 2011, Nature Structural &Molecular Biology.

[26]  Jaime Sánchez,et al.  Problem solving and collaboration using mobile serious games , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[27]  Navin Kumar Singh,et al.  Review of Diane Ravitch Book, “The Death and Life of the Great American School System: How Testing and Choice are Undermining Education.” New York, NY: Basic Books. , 2012, Poverty & Public Policy.

[28]  Helen R. Quinn,et al.  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2013 .

[29]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  A collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students' learning performance in science courses , 2013, Comput. Educ..

[30]  Joshua A. Danish,et al.  Collaborative Gaming , 2013 .

[31]  Alec M. Bodzin,et al.  A mixed methods assessment of students' flow experiences during a mobile augmented reality science game , 2013, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[32]  Chin-Chung Tsai,et al.  Affordances of Augmented Reality in Science Learning: Suggestions for Future Research , 2012, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[33]  Raija Hämäläinen,et al.  Perceived Sociability and Social Presence in a Collaborative Serious Game , 2013, Int. J. Game Based Learn..

[34]  Paolo Paolini,et al.  Multi-User Virtual Environments Fostering Collaboration in Formal Education , 2014, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[35]  Fabian Homberg,et al.  The effects of gender on group work process and achievement: an analysis through self‐ and peer‐assessment , 2014 .

[36]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Students' online interactive patterns in augmented reality-based inquiry activities , 2014, Comput. Educ..

[37]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The social and interactive dimensions of collaborative learning , 2014 .

[38]  Denise Bressler.  Better Than Business-as-Usual: Improving Scientific Practices During Discourse and Writing by Playing a Collaborative Mystery Game , 2014 .

[39]  Denise M. Bressler,et al.  Is it all in the game? Flow experience and scientific practices during an INPLACE mobile game , 2014 .

[40]  Zachari Swiecki,et al.  In Search of Conversational Grain Size: Modeling Semantic Structure Using Moving Stanza Windows , 2017, ICLS.

[41]  Meihua Qian,et al.  Game-based Learning and 21st century skills: A review of recent research , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[42]  Michele Cummins,et al.  NMC/CoSN Horizon Report: 2016 K-12 Edition. , 2016 .

[43]  Victor Law,et al.  Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Amanda Wilson,et al.  A systematic literature review of games-based learning empirical evidence in primary education , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[45]  Alec M. Bodzin,et al.  Investigating Flow Experience and Scientific Practices During a Mobile Serious Educational Game , 2016, Journal of Science Education and Technology.

[46]  David Williamson Shaffer,et al.  A Tutorial on Epistemic Network Analysis: Analyzing the Structure of Connections in Cognitive, Social, and Interaction Data , 2016, J. Learn. Anal..

[47]  Gwo-Jen Hwang,et al.  Development of an effective educational computer game based on a mission synchronization-based peer-assistance approach , 2017, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[48]  Steve Nebel,et al.  You cannot do this alone! Increasing task interdependence in cooperative educational videogames to encourage collaboration , 2017 .

[49]  Asimina Vasalou,et al.  Digital games-based learning for children with dyslexia: A social constructivist perspective on engagement and learning during group game-play , 2017, Comput. Educ..

[50]  C. Ennis.  Partnership for 21st Century Skills , 2018 .