Impact analysis of nose alterations on 2D and 3D face recognition

Numerous major challenges in face recognition, such as pose, illumination, expression and aging, have been investigated extensively. All those variations modify the texture and/or the shape of the face in a similar manner for different individuals. However, studies on alterations applied on face via plastic surgery or prosthetic make-up which can be in countless different ways and amounts, are still very limited. In this paper, we analyze how such changes on nose region affect the face recognition performances of several key techniques. For this purpose, a simulated face database is prepared using FRGC v1.0 in which nose in each sample is replaced with another randomly chosen one. Since this is a 3D database, the impact analysis is not limited to only 2D, which is one of the novelties of this study. Performance comparisons of three 2D and four 3D algorithms are provided. In addition, differently from previous works, baseline results for the original database are also reported. Hence, the impact which is purely due to the applied nose alterations can be measured. The experimental results indicate that with the introduction of alterations both modalities lose precision, especially 3D.

[1]  Himanshu S. Bhatt,et al.  Plastic Surgery: A New Dimension to Face Recognition , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security.

[2]  K. R. Singh,et al.  A New Approach to Local Plastic Surgery Face Recognition Using Near Sets , 2010 .

[3]  Fred L. Bookstein,et al.  Principal Warps: Thin-Plate Splines and the Decomposition of Deformations , 1989, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Texas 3D Face Recognition Database , 2010, 2010 IEEE Southwest Symposium on Image Analysis & Interpretation (SSIAI).

[5]  Richa Singh,et al.  Effect of plastic surgery on face recognition: A preliminary study , 2009, 2009 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops.

[6]  David J. Kriegman,et al.  Eigenfaces vs. Fisherfaces: Recognition Using Class Specific Linear Projection , 1996, ECCV.

[7]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Anthropometric 3D Face Recognition , 2010, International Journal of Computer Vision.

[8]  Tong-Yee Lee,et al.  Three-dimensional facial model reconstruction and plastic surgery simulation , 1999, IEEE Trans. Inf. Technol. Biomed..

[9]  Matti Pietikäinen,et al.  Face Recognition with Local Binary Patterns , 2004, ECCV.

[10]  Patrick J. Flynn,et al.  Overview of the face recognition grand challenge , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).

[11]  Michele Nappi,et al.  Robust Face Recognition after Plastic Surgery Using Local Region Analysis , 2011, ICIAR.

[12]  Aldo Laurentini,et al.  A Computer-Aided Technique for Planning Plastic Surgery Based on 3D Face Scans: Preliminary Results , 2010 .

[13]  Himanshu S. Bhatt,et al.  Evolutionary granular approach for recognizing faces altered due to plastic surgery , 2011, Face and Gesture 2011.

[14]  N. Erdogmus,et al.  On discriminative properties of TPS warping parameters for 3D face recognition , 2012, 2012 International Conference on Informatics, Electronics & Vision (ICIEV).

[15]  Ioannis A. Kakadiaris,et al.  Three-Dimensional Face Recognition in the Presence of Facial Expressions: An Annotated Deformable Model Approach , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[16]  Yajie Tian,et al.  Handbook of face recognition , 2003 .

[17]  Parham Aarabi,et al.  Face Fusion: An Automatic Method For Virtual Plastic Surgery , 2006, 2006 9th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[18]  Paul J. Besl,et al.  A Method for Registration of 3-D Shapes , 1992, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..