Extracting Selected Phrases through Constraint Satisfaction

We present in this paper a CHR based parsing methodology for parsing Property Grammars. This approach constitutes a flexible parsing technology in which the notions of derivation and hierarchy give way to the more flexible notion of constraint satisfaction between categories. It becomes then possible to describe the syntactic characteristics of a category in terms of satisfied and violated constraints.Different applications can take advantage of such flexibility, in particular in the case where information comes from part of the input and requires the identification of selected phrases such as NP, PP, etc. Our method presents two main advantages: first, there is no need to build an entire syntactic structure, only the selected phrases can be extracted. Moreover, such extraction can be done even from incomplete or erroneous text: indication of possible kinds of error or incompleteness can be given together with the proposed analysis for the phrases being sought.

[1]  Hiroshi Maruyama,et al.  Structural Disambiguation With Constraint Propagation , 1990, ACL.

[2]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Ellipsis and higher-order unification , 1991 .

[3]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[4]  Stuart M. Shieber,et al.  Principles and Implementation of Deductive Parsing , 1994, J. Log. Program..

[5]  Philippe Blache,et al.  Constraint Logic Programming for Natural Language Processing , 1995, ArXiv.

[6]  Verónica Dahl,et al.  Assumption Grammars for Processing Natural Language , 1997, ICLP.

[7]  G. Bès,et al.  Propriétés et analyse d'un langage , 1998 .

[8]  Slim Abdennadher,et al.  Chr _ : a Flexible Query Language , 2022 .

[9]  Thom W. Frühwirth,et al.  Theory and Practice of Constraint Handling Rules , 1998, J. Log. Program..

[10]  Miles Osborne,et al.  MDL-based DCG Induction for NP Identification , 1999, CoNLL.

[11]  G. Bès La phrase verbale noyau en français , 1999 .

[12]  Walter Daelemans,et al.  Applying System Combination to Base Noun Phrase Identification , 2000, COLING.

[13]  Henning Christiansen,et al.  CHR as grammar formalism. A first report , 2001, ArXiv.

[14]  Philippe Blache,et al.  Property Grammars: a Flexible Constraint-Based Approach to Parsing , 2001, IWPT.

[15]  Henning Christiansen,et al.  Logical Grammars Based on Constraint Handling Rules , 2002, ICLP.

[16]  Henning Christiansen,et al.  Abductive language interpretation as bottom-up deduction , 2002 .

[17]  Philippe Blache,et al.  Property Grammars: A Fully Constraint-Based Theory , 2004, CSLP.

[18]  Verónica Dahl,et al.  Concept Formation Rules: An Executable Cognitive Model of Knowledge Construction , 2016, NLUCS.

[19]  P. Smolensky,et al.  Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar , 2004 .

[20]  A. Barranco-Mendoza Stochastic and heuristic modelling for analysis of the growth of pre-invasive lesions and for a multidisciplinary approach to early cancer diagnosis , 2005 .

[21]  Verónica Dahl,et al.  HYPROLOG: A New Logic Programming Language with Assumptions and Abduction , 2005, ICLP.

[22]  Henning Christiansen,et al.  CHR grammars , 2004, Theory and Practice of Logic Programming.

[23]  Paul Tarau Assumptive Logic Programming Veronica Dahl Logic and Functional Programming Group School of Computing Science , .