Comprehensive Intra-Institution stepping validation of knowledge-based models for automatic plan optimization.

PURPOSE To develop and apply a stepping approach for the validation of Knowledge-based (KB) models for planning optimization: the method was applied to the case of concomitant irradiation of pelvic nodes and prostate + seminal-vesicles bed irradiation in post-prostatectomy patients. METHODS The clinical VMAT plans of 52 patients optimized by two reference planners were selected to generate a KB-model (RapidPlan, v.13.5 Varian). A stepping-validation approach was followed by comparing KB-generated plans (with and without planner-interaction, RP and only-RP respectively) against delivered clinical plans (RA). The validation followed three steps, gradually extending its generalization: 20 patients used to develop the model (closed-loop); 20 new patients, same planners (open-loop); 20 new patients, different planners (wide-loop). All plans were compared, in terms of relevant dose-volume parameters and generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD). RESULTS KB-plans were generally better than or equivalent to clinical plans. For RPvsRA, PTVs coverage was comparable, for OARs RP was always better. Comparing only-RPvsRA, PTVs coverage was always better; bowel\bladder V50Gy and D1%, bowel\bladder\rectum Dmean, femoral heads V40Gy and penile bulb V50Gy were significantly improved. For RPvsRA gEUD reduction >1 Gy was seen in 80% of plans for rectum, bladder and bowel; for only-RPvsRA, this was found in 50% for rectum/bladder and in 70% for bowel. CONCLUSION An extensive stepping validation approach of KB-model for planning optimization showed better or equal performances of automatically generated KB-plan compared to clinical plans. The interaction of a planner further improved planning performances.

[1]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  Intercenter validation of a knowledge based model for automated planning of volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. The experience of the German RapidPlan Consortium , 2017, PloS one.

[2]  Marta Paiusco,et al.  Reducing inter- and intra-planner variability in radiotherapy plan output with a commercial knowledge-based planning solution. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[3]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. , 2011, Medical physics.

[4]  Iori Sumida,et al.  Dosimetric comparison of RapidPlan and manually optimized plans in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[5]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  Assessment of a model based optimization engine for volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with advanced hepatocellular cancer , 2014, Radiation Oncology.

[6]  Joseph O Deasy,et al.  The use and QA of biologically related models for treatment planning: short report of the TG-166 of the therapy physics committee of the AAPM. , 2012, Medical physics.

[7]  Sebastiaan Breedveld,et al.  Validation of Fully Automated VMAT Plan Generation for Library-Based Plan-of-the-Day Cervical Cancer Radiotherapy , 2016, PloS one.

[8]  G. Sanguineti,et al.  Predicting toxicity in radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2016, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[9]  Elisabetta Cagni,et al.  Knowledge-based treatment planning: An inter-technique and inter-system feasibility study for prostate cancer. , 2017, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[10]  Y. Ge,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[11]  Frederik Wenz,et al.  Knowledge-based radiation therapy (KBRT) treatment planning versus planning by experts: validation of a KBRT algorithm for prostate cancer treatment planning , 2015, Radiation oncology.

[12]  G. Sanguineti,et al.  Patient-reported intestinal toxicity from whole pelvis intensity-modulated radiotherapy: First quantification of bowel dose-volume effects. , 2017, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[13]  C. Fiorino,et al.  IMRT significantly reduces acute toxicity of whole-pelvis irradiation in patients treated with post-operative adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[14]  Xiaoning Pan,et al.  A methodology for automatic intensity-modulated radiation treatment planning for lung cancer , 2011, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Andrew Nisbet,et al.  Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  B. Slotman,et al.  Evaluation of a knowledge-based planning solution for head and neck cancer. , 2015, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  P. Voet,et al.  Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  D. Georg,et al.  Automated volumetric modulated arc therapy planning for whole pelvic prostate radiotherapy , 2017, Strahlentherapie und Onkologie.

[19]  Elisabetta Cagni,et al.  Pareto-optimal plans as ground truth for validation of a commercial system for knowledge-based DVH-prediction. , 2018, Physica medica : PM : an international journal devoted to the applications of physics to medicine and biology : official journal of the Italian Association of Biomedical Physics.

[20]  F. Fazio,et al.  Dose-volume relationships for acute bowel toxicity in patients treated with pelvic nodal irradiation for prostate cancer. , 2009, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  J. Lo,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[22]  Luca Cozzi,et al.  On the pre-clinical validation of a commercial model-based optimisation engine: application to volumetric modulated arc therapy for patients with lung or prostate cancer. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[23]  Radhe Mohan,et al.  Clinical Investigation : Thoracic Cancer Automated Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Treatment Planning for Stage III Lung Cancer : How Does It Compare With Intensity-Modulated Radio Therapy ? , 2012 .

[24]  Andrew Jackson,et al.  Evaluating inter-campus plan consistency using a knowledge based planning model. , 2016, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  G. Sanguineti,et al.  Dose-volume effects for normal tissues in external radiotherapy: pelvis. , 2009, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[26]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[27]  P. Mancosu,et al.  RapidPlan head and neck model: the objectives and possible clinical benefit , 2017, Radiation Oncology.