Spatial and temporal occurrence of preferential flow in a forested headwater catchment

Summary The highly dynamic nature of preferential flow in time and space makes it challenging to identify and analyze its occurrence at the catchment scale. Novel analysis methods using soil moisture sensor response times offer an opportunity to investigate catchment-wide controls on preferential flow. The aim of this study was to identify factors that control preferential flow occurrence based on 3-year soil moisture monitoring using a wireless sensor network in the Wustebach catchment, Germany. At 101 locations, the sensor response times at three depths (5, 20, and 50 cm) were classified into one of four classes: (1) non-sequential preferential flow, (2) velocity-based preferential flow, (3) sequential flow, and (4) no response. A conceptual model, postulating that preferential flow in the Wustebach catchment is dominated by differences in soil type, landscape position, and rainfall input, was proposed for hypothesis testing. To test the conceptual model, the classification results were combined with spatial and event-based data to understand and identify controlling factors. Spatial parameters consisted of hydrological, topographical, and soil physical and chemical parameters. Temporal factors included precipitation characteristics and antecedent soil moisture conditions. The conceptual model as proposed could only be partly confirmed. Event-based occurrence of preferential flow was highly affected by precipitation amount, with a nearly catchment-wide preferential response during large storm events. During intermediate events, preferential flow was controlled by small-scale heterogeneity, instead of showing catchment-wide patterns. The effect of antecedent catchment wetness on the occurrence of preferential flow was generally less profound, although a clear negative relationship was found for precipitation events with more than 25 mm. It was found that spatial occurrence of preferential flow was however governed by small-scale soil and biological features and local processes, and showed no obvious relationship with any of the selected spatial parameters. Overall, the results demonstrate that sensor response time analysis can offer innovative insights into the spatial–temporal interrelationship of preferential flow occurrence.

[1]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Evaluation of a low-cost soil water content sensor for wireless network applications , 2007 .

[2]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 2. The fill and spill hypothesis , 2006 .

[3]  H. Gerke,et al.  Preferential Flow Effects on Infiltration and Runoff in Grassland and Forest Soils , 2011 .

[4]  Jungho Kim,et al.  Tracing solute infiltration using a combined method of dye tracer test and electrical resistivity tomography in an undisturbed forest soil profile , 2010 .

[5]  S. Moysey,et al.  Can the Onset of Macropore Flow be Detected using Electrical Resistivity Measurements , 2012 .

[6]  M. Sivapalan,et al.  Identifying a rainfall event threshold triggering herbicide leaching by preferential flow , 2010 .

[7]  Jin Chen,et al.  Subsurface lateral preferential flow network revealed by time‐lapse ground‐penetrating radar in a hillslope , 2014 .

[8]  Henry Lin,et al.  Linking principles of soil formation and flow regimes , 2010 .

[9]  P. Blackwell,et al.  Management of water repellency in Australia, and risks associated with preferential flow, pesticide concentration and leaching. , 2000 .

[10]  Irena Hajnsek,et al.  A Network of Terrestrial Environmental Observatories in Germany , 2011 .

[11]  C. B. Graham,et al.  Controls and Frequency of Preferential Flow Occurrence: A 175‐Event Analysis , 2011 .

[12]  Suzanne E. Allaire,et al.  Quantifying preferential flow in soils: A review of different techniques , 2009 .

[13]  N. L. M. B. van Schaik,et al.  Spatial variability of infiltration patterns related to site characteristics in a semi-arid watershed , 2009 .

[14]  J. Koestel,et al.  What determines the strength of preferential transport in undisturbed soil under steady-state flow? , 2014 .

[15]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Sensor‐to‐Sensor Variability of the ECH2O EC‐5, TE, and 5TE Sensors in Dielectric Liquids , 2010 .

[16]  Harry Vereecken,et al.  Spatiotemporal relations between water budget components and soil water content in a forested tributary catchment , 2014 .

[17]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Investigating Preferential Flow Processes in a Forest Soil Using Time Domain Reflectometry and Electrical Resistivity Tomography , 2010 .

[18]  M. Bonell.  Progress in the understanding of runoff generation dynamics in forests , 1993 .

[19]  A. Western,et al.  Seasonal and event dynamics of spatial soil moisture patterns at the small catchment scale , 2012 .

[20]  Scott B. Jones,et al.  Standardizing Characterization of Electromagnetic Water Content Sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of Seven Sensing Systems , 2005 .

[21]  H. Vereecken,et al.  A terrestrial observatory approach to the integrated investigation of the effects of deforestation on water, energy, and matter fluxes , 2014, Science China Earth Sciences.

[22]  N. Jarvis.  A review of non‐equilibrium water flow and solute transport in soil macropores: principles, controlling factors and consequences for water quality , 2007 .

[23]  M. Hardie,et al.  Determining the frequency, depth and velocity of preferential flow by high frequency soil moisture monitoring. , 2013, Journal of contaminant hydrology.

[24]  H. Lin,et al.  Evidence of subsurface preferential flow using soil hydrologic monitoring in the Shale Hills catchment , 2007 .

[25]  J. Moeys,et al.  Soil properties and susceptibility to preferential solute transport in tilled topsoil at the catchment scale , 2013 .

[26]  Keith Beven,et al.  Macropores and water flow in soils revisited , 2013 .

[27]  H. Vereecken,et al.  Potential of Wireless Sensor Networks for Measuring Soil Water Content Variability , 2010 .

[28]  Henry Lin,et al.  Frequency and Control of Subsurface Preferential Flow: From Pedon to Catchment Scales , 2015 .

[29]  Matthias Drusch,et al.  Global Automated Quality Control of In Situ Soil Moisture Data from the International Soil Moisture Network , 2013 .

[30]  Jeffrey J. McDonnell,et al.  Threshold relations in subsurface stormflow: 1. A 147‐storm analysis of the Panola hillslope , 2006 .

[31]  Nicholas M. Holden,et al.  Preferential flow variability in a well-structured soil. , 2003 .

[32]  P. Germann,et al.  Poiseuille Flow Geometry Inferred from Velocities of Wetting Fronts in Soils , 2006 .

[33]  Hannes Flühler,et al.  SUSCEPTIBILITY OF SOILS TO PREFERENTIAL FLOW OF WATER : A FIELD STUDY , 1994 .

[34]  Marcus Hardie,et al.  Effect of antecedent soil moisture on preferential flow in a texture-contrast soil , 2011 .