24-chromosome PCR for aneuploidy screening

Purpose of review The purpose of this study is to describe the many advantages of PCR-based comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) methodologies and the importance of extensive preclinical validation. Recent findings The rigorous preclinical validation of quantitative real-time (q)PCR-based CCS involved an initial validation on cell lines, followed by a blinded evaluation on embryos. Comparison with alternative platforms and a prospective randomized clinical trial demonstrate superior precision and improved sustained implantation and delivery rates. Preclinical validation of targeted PCR-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) has also demonstrated consistency in positive controls, equivalent accuracy to commonly used techniques, high resolution, increased throughput, the simultaneous detection of single gene disorders and triploidy, and the potential to decrease costs. Prospective randomized controlled trials are ongoing to validate this technique for clinical use. Summary CCS using PCR-based methodology improves implantation and delivery rates and allows for fresh embryo transfers. Other platforms are available to select euploid embryos; however, there are meaningful differences between techniques. PCR-based NGS technology may further enhance the utility of CCS for patients with infertility.

[1]  Deanne Taylor,et al.  Clinically recognizable error rate after the transfer of comprehensive chromosomal screened euploid embryos is low. , 2014, Fertility and sterility.

[2]  F. Kokocinski,et al.  Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. , 2014, Human reproduction.

[3]  L. Rienzi,et al.  Comparison of array comparative genomic hybridization and quantitative real-time PCR-based aneuploidy screening of blastocyst biopsies , 2014, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[4]  B. Levy,et al.  Rapid and concurrent comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) and single gene disorder (SGD) PGD , 2014 .

[5]  E. Forman,et al.  Examining the temperature of embryo culture in in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial comparing traditional core temperature (37°C) to a more physiologic, cooler temperature (36°C). , 2014, Fertility and Sterility.

[6]  Jenny C. Taylor,et al.  Clinical utilisation of a rapid low-pass whole genome sequencing technique for the diagnosis of aneuploidy in human embryos prior to implantation , 2014, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[7]  D. Griffin,et al.  The origin, mechanisms, incidence and clinical consequences of chromosomal mosaicism in humans. , 2014, Human reproduction update.

[8]  Deanne M. Taylor,et al.  Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[9]  N. Treff,et al.  Development and validation of a next-generation sequencing (NGS)-based 24-chromosome aneuploidy screening system , 2013 .

[10]  W. Schoolcraft,et al.  Transfer of warmed euploid blastocysts significantly improves live birth rates for infertility patients of advanced maternal age (>35 YEARS): A randomized control trial , 2013 .

[11]  Deanne M. Taylor,et al.  In vitro fertilization with single euploid blastocyst transfer: a randomized controlled trial. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[12]  Deanne M. Taylor,et al.  Evaluation of targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic diagnosis of monogenic disease. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[13]  N. Treff,et al.  Four-hour quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based comprehensive chromosome screening and accumulating evidence of accuracy, safety, predictive value, and clinical efficacy. , 2013, Fertility and sterility.

[14]  Gary S Collins,et al.  Selection of single blastocysts for fresh transfer via standard morphology assessment alone and with array CGH for good prognosis IVF patients: results from a randomized pilot study , 2012, Molecular Cytogenetics.

[15]  Deanne M. Taylor,et al.  Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[16]  Xin Tao,et al.  Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. , 2012, Fertility and sterility.

[17]  N. Treff,et al.  Methods for comprehensive chromosome screening of oocytes and embryos: capabilities, limitations, and evidence of validity , 2012, Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics.

[18]  Luca Gianaroli,et al.  Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results , 2011, Human reproduction.

[19]  F van der Veen,et al.  Preimplantation genetic screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. , 2011, Human reproduction update.

[20]  B. Levy,et al.  Accurate single cell 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening using whole genome amplification and single nucleotide polymorphism microarrays. , 2010, Fertility and sterility.

[21]  M. Rabinowitz,et al.  Preclinical validation of a microarray method for full molecular karyotyping of blastomeres in a 24-h protocol , 2010, Human reproduction.

[22]  D. Griffin,et al.  Karyomapping: a universal method for genome wide analysis of genetic disease based on mapping crossovers between parental haplotypes , 2009, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[23]  Michael R. Speicher,et al.  High resolution array-CGH analysis of single cells , 2006, Nucleic acids research.

[24]  K. Hirschhorn,et al.  First clinical application of comparative genomic hybridization and polar body testing for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. , 2002, Fertility and sterility.

[25]  S. Kingsmore,et al.  Comprehensive human genome amplification using multiple displacement amplification , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[26]  A. Handyside,et al.  Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. , 1992, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Y Moreau,et al.  Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. , 2013, Human reproduction.