Best strategies for reducing the suicide rate in Australia

Objectives: There is accumulating evidence about effectiveness of a number of suicide prevention interventions, and a multilevel systems approach seems promising in reducing suicide risk. This approach requires that components ranging from individual-level to public health interventions are implemented simultaneously in a localised region. This paper presents estimated reductive effects on suicide attempts and deaths that might be expected in Australia if active components of the systems approach were to be implemented. Method: The study estimated population preventable fractions which indicate the extent to which suicide attempts and deaths might be decreased if the each of the proposed interventions was fully implemented. The population preventable fractions were based on the best available evidence available in the literature for the risk ratio for each intervention. Prevalence estimates were assessed for each component of the proposed systems approach: reducing access to suicide means, media guidelines, public health campaigns, gatekeeper programmes, school programmes, general practitioner training, psychotherapy and co-ordinated/assertive aftercare. Results: There was insufficient evidence available for the impact of a number of strategies, including frontline staff gatekeeper training, on either suicide attempts or deaths. Taking prevalence of exposure to the intervention into consideration, the strategies likely to bring about the strongest reduction in suicide attempts were psychosocial treatments and co-ordinated/assertive aftercare. The greatest impact on reductions in suicide deaths was found for psychosocial treatment, general practitioner training, gatekeeper training and reducing access to means of suicide. Conclusion: The evidence regarding the overall efficacy of the systems approach is important in identifying what strategies should be prioritised to achieve the biggest impact. The findings of the population preventable fraction calculations indicate that the systems approach could lead to significant reduction in suicide attempts and suicide deaths in Australia. Potential synergistic effects between strategies included in the approach could further increase the impact of implemented strategies.

[1]  P. Herbison,et al.  Effect of Restricting Access to a Suicide Jumping Site , 2009, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[2]  E. Caine,et al.  Risk of suicide and related adverse outcomes after exposure to a suicide prevention programme in the US Air Force: cohort study , 2003, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[3]  Thomas Niederkrotenthaler,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Media Guidelines for Reporting on Suicides in Austria: Interrupted time Series Analysis , 2007, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[4]  Ping Qin,et al.  Short-term and long-term effects of psychosocial therapy for people after deliberate self-harm: a register-based, nationwide multicentre study using propensity score matching. , 2014, The lancet. Psychiatry.

[5]  Jo Robinson,et al.  The effectiveness of structural interventions at suicide hotspots: a meta-analysis. , 2013, International journal of epidemiology.

[6]  B. Gaynes,et al.  Screening for Suicide Risk in Primary Care: A Systematic Evidence Review for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force , 2013 .

[7]  H. Sørensen,et al.  Preventing repetition of attempted suicide—II. The Amager Project, a randomized controlled trial , 2011, Nordic journal of psychiatry.

[8]  Yasuyuki Sawada,et al.  The effect of public awareness campaigns on suicides: evidence from Nagoya, Japan. , 2014, Journal of affective disorders.

[9]  J. Harrison,et al.  Suicide and hospitalised self-harm in Australia: trends and analysis , 2014 .

[10]  J. Pirkis,et al.  Letters, green cards, telephone calls and postcards: Systematic and meta-analytic review of brief contact interventions for reducing self-harm, suicide attempts and suicide , 2015, British Journal of Psychiatry.

[11]  Christian Haring,et al.  School-based suicide prevention programmes: the SEYLE cluster-randomised, controlled trial , 2015, The Lancet.

[12]  Alenka Tančič Grum,et al.  Best Practice Elements of Multilevel Suicide Prevention Strategies , 2011, Crisis.

[13]  Ulrich Hegerl,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Alliances against Depression – a Community Based Approach to Target Depression and to Prevent Suicidal Behaviour , 2022 .

[14]  C. Weinberg,et al.  Use and misuse of population attributable fractions. , 1998, American journal of public health.

[15]  L. Appleby,et al.  Implementation of mental health service recommendations in England and Wales and suicide rates, 1997–2006: a cross-sectional and before-and-after observational study , 2012, The Lancet.

[16]  J. Lonnqvist,et al.  Suicide prevention strategies: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[17]  G. Isacsson,et al.  Increased antidepressant use and fewer suicides in Jämtland county, Sweden, after a primary care educational programme on the treatment of depression , 2006, Acta psychiatrica Scandinavica.

[18]  Matthew K Nock,et al.  Treatment of suicidal people around the world. , 2011, The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science.

[19]  H. Christensen,et al.  A systematic review of psychosocial suicide prevention interventions for youth , 2016, European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry.

[20]  J. Pirkis,et al.  Suicidal Thoughts and Behaviours Among Australian Adults: Findings from the 2007 National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing , 2009, The Australian and New Zealand journal of psychiatry.

[21]  D. Gunnell,et al.  Hospital Presenting Self-Harm and Risk of Fatal and Non-Fatal Repetition: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis , 2014, PloS one.

[22]  J. Pirkis,et al.  Suicide and recency of health care contacts , 1998, British Journal of Psychiatry.