Optimal L 1−L 2 primary tone level separation remains independent of test frequency in humans
暂无分享,去创建一个
Thomas Janssen | T. Janssen | P. Kummer | W. Arnold | P. Hulin | Wolfgang Arnold | Peter Kummer | Peter Hulin
[1] R. A. Schmiedt,et al. Fine structure of the 2f1-f2 acoustic distortion product: changes with primary level. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[2] D. T. Kemp,et al. An Integrated View of Cochlear Mechanical Nonlinearities Observable from the Ear Canal , 1983 .
[3] W. Arnold,et al. Wachstumsverhalten der Distorsionsproduktemissionen bei kochleären Hörstörungen , 1995 .
[4] T. Janssen,et al. Suppression tuning characteristics of the 2 f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in humans. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[5] S J Norton,et al. Vulnerability and adaptation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions to endocochlear potential variation. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[6] Max A. Viergever,et al. Mechanics of Hearing , 1983 .
[7] Gerald R. Popelka,et al. Growth of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with primary-tone level in humans , 1993, Hearing Research.
[8] Edwin W Rubel,et al. Variation of distortion product otoacoustic emissions with furosemide injection , 1994, Hearing Research.
[9] Jont B. Allen,et al. Peripheral Auditory Mechanisms , 1986 .
[10] A. M. Brown,et al. The behavior of the acoustic distortion product, 2f1-f2, from the human ear and its relation to auditory sensitivity. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[11] D. Kemp,et al. Observations on Simultaneous SFOAE and DPOAE Generation and Suppression , 1990 .
[12] M P Gorga,et al. The use of cumulative distributions to determine critical values and levels of confidence for clinical distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[13] G. K. Yates,et al. Basilar membrane measurements and the travelling wave , 1986, Hearing Research.
[14] R. A. Schmiedt,et al. Fine structure of the 2 f1-f2 acoustic distortion products: effects of primary level and frequency ratios. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[15] Mario A. Ruggero,et al. Application of a commercially-manufactured Doppler-shift laser velocimeter to the measurement of basilar-membrane vibration , 1991, Hearing Research.
[16] G. Long,et al. The dependence of the distortion product 2f1-f2 on primary levels in non-impaired human ears. , 1998, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.
[17] T. Janssen,et al. The level and growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission and its relationship to auditory sensitivity in normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[18] T. Janssen,et al. Growth behavior of the 2 f1-f2 distortion product otoacoustic emission in tinnitus. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[19] R. Hauser,et al. The influence of systematic primary-tone level variation L2-L1 on the acoustic distortion product emission 2f1-f2 in normal human ears. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[20] Glen K. Martin,et al. Distortion Product Emissions in Humans , 1990, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.
[21] L. Nielsen,et al. Clinical significance of relative probe-tone levels on distortion product otoacoustic emissions. , 1993, Scandinavian audiology.
[22] B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit. II: Differential physiological vulnerability. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[23] Glen K. Martin,et al. Sensitivity of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions in humans to tonal over-exposure: Time course of recovery and effects of lowering L2 , 1994, Hearing Research.
[24] P. Dallos. The active cochlea , 1992, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.
[25] M P Gorga,et al. Toward optimizing the clinical utility of distortion product otoacoustic emission measurements. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] A. M. Brown,et al. Measurement of acoustic distortion reveals underlying similarities between human and rodent mechanical responses. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[27] D A Nelson,et al. Distortion-product emissions and auditory sensitivity in human ears with normal hearing and cochlear hearing loss. , 1992, Journal of speech and hearing research.
[28] B L Lonsbury-Martin,et al. Evidence for two discrete sources of 2f1-f2 distortion-product otoacoustic emission in rabbit: I. Differential dependence on stimulus parameters. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[29] M. J. McCoy,et al. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. I. Effects of decreasing L2 below L1. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Hallowell Davis,et al. An active process in cochlear mechanics , 1983, Hearing Research.
[31] L. Robles,et al. Basilar-membrane responses to tones at the base of the chinchilla cochlea. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[32] M. J. McCoy,et al. Dependence of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions on primary levels in normal and impaired ears. II. Asymmetry in L1,L2 space. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[33] C. Daniel Geisler,et al. The Mechanics and Biophysics of Hearing , 1990 .