Monitoring of algae in Dutch rivers: does it meet its goals?

Observations on phytoplankton in the lower reaches of the rivers Rhine and Meuse were carried out in the framework of the national monitoring programme of the main water systems in The Netherlands. Seasonal changes in density and species composition were analysed to detect the major variables and to discuss whether this monitoring meets its goals. Phytoplankton reached peak densities of 140 and 65 µg L-1 Chl a in the Rhine and Meuse, respectively. Overall density was correlated with seasonal variation in water discharge rather than with nutrient concentrations, that are high in both rivers. The position of sampling sites in relation to the downstream development of the plankton was very important, especially in the regulated Meuse. Despite hydrographic and chemical differences between the two rivers, many species, predominantly diatoms and green algae, were shared. The occurrence of the diatom Skeletonema subsalsum in the Rhine and the green algae Neodesmus danubialis, Micractinium pusillum and Pseudotetrastrum punctatum in the Meuse (1992, but not 1996) was interpreted as a feature related, respectively, to the high salinity of the Rhine and specific riverine conditions of the Meuse. In general the potamoplankton was characterised as an opportunistic assemblage exploiting the high nutrient contents and disturbed hydrography of both rivers. Nevertheless, the phytoplankton contributed to the characterisation of the present river communities, ones that differ rather strongly in historic records. Although year to year variation in phytoplankton density is mainly related to variation in water discharge, phytoplankton biomass did increase as a result of eutrophication over a period of decades. The widespread nature of many of today's potamoplankton species in the two rivers render these organisms less useful for indicating short-term changes in water quality. However the importance of phytoplankton in trophic relationships merits its inclusion in the monitoring of riverine ecosystems.

[1]  H. B. N. Hynes,et al.  The Ecology of Running Waters , 1971 .

[2]  G. Hasle,et al.  BRACKISH WATER AND FRESHWATER SPECIES OF THE DIATOM GENUS SKELETONEMA. II. SKELETONEMA POTAMOS COMB. NOV. 1 , 1976 .

[3]  G. Minshall,et al.  The River Continuum Concept , 1980 .

[4]  Ulrich Sommer,et al.  The PEG-model of seasonal succession of planktonic events in fresh waters , 1986, Archiv für Hydrobiologie.

[5]  h-sas-i-ahlgren.  Lake restoration by reduction of nutrient loading: Expectations, experiences, extrapolations , 1989 .

[6]  W. Junk.  The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems , 1989 .

[7]  F. Colijn,et al.  A quantitative method for description & assessment of ecosystems: The AMOEBA-approach , 1991 .

[8]  W. Admiraal,et al.  Plankton in the River Rhine: structural and functional changes observed during downstream transport , 1992 .

[9]  W. Admiraal,et al.  A model of phytoplankton production in the lower River Rhine verified by observed changes in silicate concentration , 1993 .

[10]  Spatial and temporal changes inphytoplankton abundance in the upper and middle reaches of the RiverSevern , 1993 .

[11]  Shallows of the lower Danube as additional sources of potamoplankton , 1994 .

[12]  M. Delong,et al.  The riverine productivity model: an heuristic view of carbon sources and organic processing in large river ecosystems , 1994 .

[13]  W. Admiraal,et al.  Seasonal variation in composition and production of planktonic communities in the lower River Rhine , 1994 .

[14]  Origin and succession of phytoplankton in a river-lake system (Spree, Germany) , 1994 .

[15]  The long, the short and the stalled: on the attributes of phytoplankton selected by physical mixing in lakes and rivers , 1994 .

[16]  W. Admiraal,et al.  Results of an international plankton investigation on the River Rhine , 1994 .

[17]  F. V. D. Brink.  Impact of hydrology on floodplain lake ecosystems along the lower Rhine and Meuse , 1994 .

[18]  Phyto- and zooplankton dynamics in the river Meuse during 1992 , 1996 .

[19]  Effecten van eutrofiering en hydrologische omstandigheden op fytoplankton in de Maas ; consequenties voor de drinkwaterbereiding , 1996 .

[20]  F. Pick,et al.  Factors regulating phytoplankton and zooplankton biomass in temperate rivers , 1996 .

[21]  F. Pick,et al.  Phytoplankton and zooplankton development in a lowland, temperate river , 1997 .

[22]  P. Reich,et al.  The Influence of Functional Diversity and Composition on Ecosystem Processes , 1997 .

[23]  P. Mccormick.  Algal indicators of aquatic ecosystem condition and change , 1997 .

[24]  J. Thorp,et al.  Effects of navigation dams, tributaries, and littoral zones on phytoplankton communities in the Ohio River , 1997 .

[25]  W. P. Cofino,et al.  Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development , 1997 .

[26]  Colin S. Reynolds,et al.  Vegetation processes in the pelagic : a model for ecosystem theory , 1997 .

[27]  J. Köhler.  Origin and succession of phytoplankton in a river-lake system (Spree, Germany) , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[28]  C. S. Reynolds,et al.  Are phytoplankton dynamics in rivers so different from those in shallow lakes? , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[29]  J. Garnier,et al.  Modelling phytoplankton development in whole drainage networks: the RIVERSTRAHLER Model applied to the Seine river system , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[30]  J. Descy,et al.  Development and ecological importance of phytoplankton in a large lowland river (River Meuse, Belgium) , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[31]  W. Admiraal,et al.  The rivers Rhine and Meuse in The Netherlands: present state and signs of ecological recovery , 1993, Hydrobiologia.

[32]  J. Descy,et al.  The phytoplankton community of the River Meuse, Belgium: seasonal dynamics (year 1992) and the possible incidence of zooplankton grazing , 1994, Hydrobiologia.

[33]  W. Admiraal,et al.  Phases in the development of riverine plankton: Examples from the rivers Rhine and Meuse , 1990, Hydrobiological Bulletin.