Fundamental Properties of Optimal Orbital Transfers

The Hohmann transfer theory, developed in 19th century, is the kernel of orbital transfer with minimum propellant mass by means of chemical engines. The success of the Deep Space 1 spacecraft has paved the way toward using advanced electrical engines in space. While chemical engines are characterized by high thrust and low specific impulse, electrical engines are characterized by low thrust and high specific impulse. In this paper, we focus on three issues of optimal orbital transfers for a spacecraft controlled via thrust direction and setting: (a) trajectories of compromise between flight time and propellant mass, (b) trajectories of minimum propellant mass, and (c) relations with the Hohmann transfer trajectory. The resulting fundamental properties are as follows: (a) Flight Time/Propellant Mass Compromise. For interplanetary orbital transfer (orbital period of order year), an important objective of trajectory optimization is a compromise between flight time and propellant mass. The resulting trajectories have a three-subarc thrust profile: the first and third subarcs are characterized by maximum thrust; the second subarc is characterized by zero thrust (coasting flight); for the first subarc, the normal component of the thrust is opposite to that of the third subarc. When the compromise factor shifts from flight time toward propellant mass, the average magnitude of the thrust angle for the first and third subarcs decreases, while the flight 1 The development of the multiple-subarc sequential gradient-restoration algorithm employed in this work was supported by NSF Grant CMS-0218878.

[1]  Bernell R. Mccormick,et al.  SeGRAm: A practical and versatile tool for spacecraft trajectory optimization , 1991 .

[2]  Angelo Miele,et al.  Assessment of launch vehicle advances to enable human mars excursions , 2001 .

[3]  A. Miele,et al.  Sequential gradient-restoration algorithm for optimal control problems , 1970 .

[4]  Marc D. Rayman,et al.  MISSION DESIGN FOR DEEP SPACE 1 : A LOW-THRUST TECHNOLOGY VALIDATION MISSION , 1999 .

[5]  Angelo Miele,et al.  Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 2: Application to a Multistage Launch Vehicle Design , 2003 .

[6]  A. Axelrod,et al.  Optimal Control of Interplanetary Trajectories Using Electrical Propulsion with Discrete Thrust Levels , 2000 .

[7]  S. R. Vadali,et al.  Using Low-Thrust Exhaust-Modulated Propulsion Fuel-Optimal Planar Earth-Mars Trajectories , 2000 .

[8]  A. Miele,et al.  Multiple-Subarc Gradient-Restoration Algorithm, Part 1: Algorithm Structure , 2003 .

[9]  V. K. Basapur,et al.  Primal and dual formulations of sequential gradient-restoration algorithms for trajectory optimization problems , 1986 .

[10]  Angelo Miele,et al.  Optimal transfers from an Earth orbit to a Mars orbit , 1999 .

[11]  Jacques Bernussou,et al.  Electric transfer optimization for mars sample return mission , 2001 .

[12]  Angelo Miele,et al.  Computation of optimal Mars trajectories via combined chemical/electrical propulsion, part 1: baseline solutions for deep interplanetary space , 2004 .

[13]  Gani B. Ganapathi,et al.  Performance of the Xenon Feed System on Deep Space One , 2000 .

[14]  A. L. Herman,et al.  Optimal, Low-Thrust Earth-Orbit Transfers Using Higher-Order Collocation Methods , 2002 .

[15]  Steven N. Williams,et al.  Mars Missions Using Solar Electric Propulsion , 2000 .

[16]  Angelo Miele,et al.  Theory of flight paths , 1962 .

[17]  W J O'Neil,et al.  The Mars Sample Return Project. , 2000, Acta astronautica.

[18]  Gerald Walberg,et al.  How shall we go to Mars? A review of mission scenarios , 1992 .

[19]  Angelo Miele,et al.  Optimal trajectories and mirror properties for round-trip Mars missions , 1999 .

[20]  Stephen D. Heister,et al.  Design of a Hybrid Chemical/Electric Propulsion Orbital Transfer Vehicle , 2002 .

[21]  Moshe Guelman,et al.  Autonomous navigation and guidance system for low thrust driven deep space missions , 1999 .