Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory brain stem evoked by bipolar intracochlear electrical stimulation: effects of current level and pulse duration

Fos-like immunoreactivity was used to compare the auditory brain stem excitation elicited by bipolar electrical stimulation of the cochlea at various current levels relative to the electrically evoked auditory brain stem response threshold for a 50-micros/phase monophasic pulse. Fos-like immunoreactive cells were labeled in primary auditory brain stem regions. The distribution of labeled cells was restricted to regions known to be cochleotopically related to the stimulated region of the scala tympani. Some labeled cells were observed at 2x electrically evoked auditory brain stem response threshold. The number, density and spatial distribution of labeled cells were quantified in the dorsal cochlear nucleus and inferior colliculus, and found to increase with increasing level of stimulation. For 50-micros pulses, the location of labeled neurons remained reasonably restricted to narrow bands within each region until the 1Ox level of stimulation (20 dB above electrically evoked auditory brain stem response threshold) was reached. While a monotonic increase in Fos-like immunoreactivity with increasing stimulus level was observed in most nuclei, for cells of the superficial layer of the dorsal cochlear nucleus, a non-monotonic change with increasing stimulus level was seen. This dorsal cochlear nucleus non-monotonicity may indicate that, at higher levels of stimulation, a secondary indirect inhibitory input, probably associated with activation of deep layer dorsal cochlear nucleus cells, reduces excitatory responses at the superficial layer of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. Electrically evoked auditory brain stem response and Fos expression showed parallel changes as a function of stimulus level and pulse duration. The data indicate that discrete activation of cell populations within the central auditory pathways can occur with bipolar electrical stimulation to the highest levels of stimulation typically useful in humans. The data also indicate a close, but not identical, quantitative relationship between Fos-like immunoreactivity and electrophysiological response amplitude. These findings support the view that a study of Fos-like immunoreactivity can provide a powerful and quantitative tool for study of the dynamic response characteristics of cells of the central auditory system to electrical stimulation at suprathreshold levels. The data suggest that there is a monotonic increase in the number of neurons responsive to intracochlear electrical stimulation as a function of stimulus level, at least through the upper half of the dynamic range, but that this increase does not result in a complete loss of spatial selectivity. Coupled with previous psychophysical studies, these results suggest that the increase in the number of activated neurons is functionally beneficial, resulting in improved discrimination of changes in the electrical signals.

[1]  Teresa A. Zwolan,et al.  Effects of phase duration on detection of electrical stimulation of the human cochlea , 1993, Hearing Research.

[2]  E D Young,et al.  Excitatory/inhibitory response types in the cochlear nucleus: relationships to discharge patterns and responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. , 1985, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  K. A. Hutson,et al.  Fine structure of the cell clusters in the cochlear nerve root: Stellate, granule, and mitt cells offer insights into the synaptic organization of local circuit neurons , 1996, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[4]  R R Marsh,et al.  Brain Stem Response Evoked by Electrical Stimulation of the round Window of the Guinea Pig , 1981, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[5]  Allen F Ryan,et al.  Spatial distribution of neural activity evoked by electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1990, Hearing Research.

[6]  R. Faull,et al.  The use of c-fos as a metabolic marker in neuronal pathway tracing , 1989, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[7]  G. Clark,et al.  Proceedings of the International Cochlear Implant, Speech and Hearing Symposium. Melbourne, 1994. , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology & laryngology. Supplement.

[8]  T. Houtani,et al.  Identification of rat brainstem sites with neuronal Fos protein induced by acoustic stimulation with pure tones. , 1993, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[9]  I. Verma,et al.  Viral and cellular fos proteins: A comparative analysis , 1984, Cell.

[10]  Francis Kuk,et al.  Evaluation of five different cochlear implant designs: Audiologic assessment and predictors of performance , 1988, The Laryngoscope.

[11]  S. Rose,et al.  Effects of early experience on c-fos gene expression in the chick forebrain , 1991, Brain Research.

[12]  R V Shannon,et al.  Detection of gaps in sinusoids and pulse trains by patients with cochlear implants. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  W. House,et al.  Long Term Results of Electrode Implantation and Electronic Stimulation of the Cochlea in Man , 1973, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[14]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single Auditory Units in the Superior Olivary Complex: II: Locations of Unit Categories and Tonotopic Organization , 1972 .

[15]  D Sutton,et al.  Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Physiological properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve. II. Single fiber recordings , 1984, Hearing Research.

[17]  A. Snyder-Keller,et al.  Audiogenic seizures induce c-fos in a model of developmental epilepsy , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[18]  S. Hunt,et al.  Induction of c-fos-like protein in spinal cord neurons following sensory stimulation , 1987, Nature.

[19]  P. Stypulkowski,et al.  Single fiber mapping of spatial excitation patterns in the electrically stimulated auditory nerve , 1987, Hearing Research.

[20]  Behavioral and electrophysiological responses to electrical stimulation in the cat I. Absolute thresholds , 1994, Hearing Research.

[21]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Effects of level on nonspectral frequency difference limens for electrical and acoustic stimuli , 1990, Hearing Research.

[22]  G. Woodworth,et al.  Results of multichannel cochlear implants in congenital and acquired prelingual deafness in children: five-year follow-up. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[23]  J. Guinan,et al.  Single auditory units in the superior olivary complex , 1972 .

[24]  E. Rouiller,et al.  Distribution of Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory pathway of the Sprague-Dawley rat elicited by cochlear electrical stimulation , 1994, Neuroscience Research.

[25]  R. Fields,et al.  Specific regulation of immediate early genes by patterned neuronal activity , 1993, Journal of neuroscience research.

[26]  J. Verbalis,et al.  c-Fos and Related Immediate Early Gene Products as Markers of Activity in Neuroendocrine Systems , 1993, Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology.

[27]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[28]  K K Osen,et al.  Stellate neurons in rat dorsal cochlear nucleus studied with combined Golgi impregnation and electron microscopy: synaptic connections and mutual coupling by gap junctions , 1984, Journal of neurocytology.

[29]  B. Pfingst,et al.  Stimulus features affecting psychophysical detection thresholds for electrical stimulation of the cochlea. I: Phase duration and stimulus duration. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  S. Newman,et al.  Colocalization of tyrosine hydroxylase and Fos in the male Syrian hamster brain following different states of arousal. , 1994, Journal of neurobiology.

[31]  Teresa A. Zwolan,et al.  Effects of stimulus level on nonspectral frequency discrimination by human subjects , 1994, Hearing Research.

[32]  E. Young,et al.  Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[33]  G. Ehret,et al.  Neuronal activity and tonotopy in the auditory system visualized by c-fos gene expression , 1991, Brain Research.

[34]  D. Anderson,et al.  Tonotopic organization and discharge characteristics of single neurons in nuclei of the lateral lemniscus of the cat. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[35]  Joe C. Adams,et al.  Sound stimulation induces Fos‐related antigens in cells with common morphological properties throughout the auditory brainstem , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[36]  G. Clark,et al.  Neural processes in the dorsal cochlear nucleus of the anaesthetised cat investigated from unit responses to electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve , 1994, Hearing Research.

[37]  Charles W. Parkins,et al.  Auditory-nerve single-neuron thresholds to electrical stimulation from scala tympani electrodes , 1987, Hearing Research.

[38]  R. Naquet,et al.  Audiogenic seizures evoked in DBA/2 mice inducec-fos oncogene expression into subcortical auditory nuclei , 1990, Brain Research.

[39]  W. Shofner,et al.  Inhibitory connections between AVCN and DCN: Evidence from lidocaine injection in AVCN , 1987, Hearing Research.

[40]  J. Goldberg,et al.  Functional organization of the dog superior olivary complex: an anatomical and electrophysiological study. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[41]  D. A. Godfrey,et al.  Connections between the cochlear nuclei in guinea pig , 1992, Hearing Research.

[42]  J. McNamara,et al.  Differential expression of immediate early genes in the hippocampus in the kindling model of epilepsy. , 1991, Brain research. Molecular brain research.

[43]  R. Post,et al.  C-fos mRNA expression following electrical-induced seizure and acute nociceptive stress in mouse brain , 1989, Epilepsy Research.

[44]  Eric D. Young,et al.  Identification of response properties of ascending axons from dorsal cochlear nucleus , 1980, Brain Research.

[45]  R. Shannon Threshold and loudness functions for pulsatile stimulation of cochlear implants , 1985, Hearing Research.

[46]  P M Seligman,et al.  Multichannel cochlear implantation in children: a summary of current work at the University of Melbourne. , 1991, The American journal of otology.

[47]  M. C. Brown,et al.  Fos‐like immunoreactivity in central auditory neurons of the mouse , 1995, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[48]  E. Friauf Tonotopic Order in the Adult and Developing Auditory System of the Rat as Shown by c‐fos Immunocytochemistry , 1992, The European journal of neuroscience.

[49]  P R Kileny,et al.  Effects of channel number and place of stimulation on performance with the Cochlear Corporation multichannel implant. , 1992, The American journal of otology.

[50]  Paul J. Abbas,et al.  Intraoperative and Postoperative Electrically Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in Nucleus Cochlear Implant Users: Implications for the Fitting Process , 1994, Ear and hearing.

[51]  Electrically induced Fos-like immunoreactivity in the auditory pathway of the rat: Effects of survival time, duration, and intensity of stimulation , 1996, Brain Research Bulletin.

[52]  Charles A. Miller,et al.  Functional responses from guinea pigs with cochlear implants. I. Electrophysiological and psychophysical measures , 1995, Hearing Research.

[53]  J. Zook,et al.  Origin of ascending projections to inferior colliculus in the mustache bat, Pteronotus parnellii , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[54]  E. Rouiller,et al.  Intracellular marking of physiologically characterized cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus of the cat , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[55]  N. Cant,et al.  Pathways connecting the right and left cochlear nuclei , 1982, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[56]  F R Sharp,et al.  c-fos mRNA, Fos, and Fos-related antigen induction by hypertonic saline and stress , 1991, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[57]  E. Mugnaini,et al.  Cartwheel neurons of the dorsal cochlear nucleus: A Golgi‐electron microscopic study in rat , 1984, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[58]  Rainer Hartmann,et al.  Discharge patterns of cat primary auditory fibers with electrical stimulation of the cochlea , 1984, Hearing Research.

[59]  P M Seligman,et al.  Vowel and consonant recognition of cochlear implant patients using formant-estimating speech processors. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[60]  Archibald Vivian Hill,et al.  The strength-duration relation for electric excitation of medullated nerve , 1936 .

[61]  Mapping of the cochlear nucleus subregions in the rat with neuronal Fos protein induced by acoustic stimulation with low tones , 1992, Neuroscience Letters.

[62]  R. Shannon Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.