The Active Board System (TABS)TM is a unified succession and transition planning concept and process that is easily adaptable to all families and their businesses. In TABS, the Board is the “balance point” between owners and managers. In other words, the Board keeps the owners and managers “in balance” by making sure that these two working groups solve their distinct issues and problems.The Board does this by owning the process of directing the managers and owners to address and resolve their respective issues and problems. TABS require the owners to come up with a plan, setting out their values, needs, and the goals of the owners as a group.The Board reviews the owners’ plan by asking relevant questions including questions about the succession and transition plans. Once the owners’ plan is accepted by the Board, it is given to management, which prepares its strategic and annual plans for the company. The Board reviews management’s plans by asking specific questions, including are management’s plans consistent with the owners’ plan. According to TABS, the Board does not create or develop either the owners’ plan or management’s plans. The owners create and maintain their plan, and the managers develop and maintain the strategic and annual plans for the company. TABS maintain there are seven basic Alternative Board Structures (ABS). Which level is most appropriate depends on the succession and transition plans. No one Board makeup is right for every family business. ______________________________ When family business consultants discuss succession planning, they usually talk about what a business owner wants to accomplish, different structures to achieve the business owner’s goals, and the processes to use. But when family business consultants and family members talk about governance as part of succession planning, they often do not start with asking what approaches, structures, and processes are available and what might be most helpful to a particular business and ownership group. Rather, the starting point is generally whether a Board of Directors is needed or not.The reason for this is not hard to find. Business owners tend not to want a functioning Board, especially with outside directors, while family business consultants tend to assume that a Board of Directors with some outsiders on the Board is a necessary component of a successful transition plan.This article recommends that these biases be set aside in favor of a more discerning approach to governance. The Active Board System (TABS) TM offers a foundation to use effective governance to help solve such difficult transition issues. TABS is “active” in that the Board actively directs both owners and managers. It is a “system” in that the Board is an integral part of the process of owning and managing the business, and it has specific responsibilities, authorities, priorities, and boundaries that are defined and respected, while at the same time tailored for each family business.
[1]
Robert J. Crutcher,et al.
The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance.
,
1993
.
[2]
Bernard J. Jaworski,et al.
Market Orientation: The Construct, Research Propositions, and Managerial Implications
,
1990
.
[3]
John C. Narver,et al.
The Effect of a Market Orientation on Business Profitability
,
1990
.
[4]
Andrei Shleifer,et al.
Corporate Ownership Around the World
,
1998
.
[5]
T. Allen,et al.
Consequences associated with work-to-family conflict: a review and agenda for future research.
,
2000,
Journal of occupational health psychology.
[6]
Ellen Galinsky,et al.
The 1997 National Study of the Changing Workforce
,
1998
.
[7]
John A. Davis,et al.
Generation to Generation: Life Cycles of the Family Business
,
1997
.
[8]
R. Pettit,et al.
Small Business Finance: A Research Agenda
,
1985
.
[9]
R. Kneebone,et al.
Twelve tips on teaching basic surgical skills using simulation and multimedia.
,
1999,
Medical teacher.
[10]
Winston Bennett,et al.
Factors That Influence Skill Decay and Retention: A Quantitative Review and Analysis
,
1998
.
[11]
B. Dunn,et al.
Themes and Issues in the Recognition of Family Businesses in the United Kingdom
,
1995
.
[12]
E. Alan Hartman,et al.
Strategic Orientation: Differences between Family and Nonfamily Firms
,
1999
.
[13]
Rik Donckels,et al.
Are Family Businesses Really Different? European Experiences from STRATOS
,
1991
.
[14]
Mingfang Li,et al.
Environmental dynamism, capital structure and performance: a theoretical integration and an empirical test
,
2000
.
[15]
C. Matthews,et al.
Capital Structure Decision Making in Privately Held Firms: Beyond the Finance Paradigm
,
1994
.
[16]
J J Kabara,et al.
Spiral curriculum.
,
1972,
Journal of medical education.
[17]
Martha M. Ertman.
Unbending Gender: Why Family and Work Conflict and What To Do About It
,
2000
.
[18]
G. Hall,et al.
Small firm growth, access to capital markets and financial structure: Review of issues and an empirical investigation
,
1996
.
[19]
John L. Ward,et al.
The Special Role of Strategic Planning for Family Businesses
,
1988
.