INTRODUCTION The concept of a public participation geographic information system (PPGIS) has been extensively discussed since the middle of the 1990s (Pickles 1995; Rinner 1999; Kingston, Carver et al. 2000; Carver 2001; Al-Kodmany 2001). The main idea at that time was to enable and enhance communication between citizens and decision makers with the help of a geographical information system (GIS). Rinner (1999, 2005, 2006) contributed a model known as argumentation maps that modeled relations of geographically referenced objects with the opinions of citizens. One of the first implemented PPGIS applications was titled Virtual Slaithwaite and developed in 1998. It was "arguably among the first such systems available to the public which allowed a two-way flow of information" (Carver, Evans et al. 2012). Research at that time mostly focused on discussions about a variety of participatory functionalities that could possibly be integrated into a GIS (Steinmann, Krek et al. 2004). Around 2005, the enthusiasm about PPGIS began to fade, but the research community still had several very interesting study cases and applications implemented mostly by universities. The conceptual ideas were inspiring but did not lead to user-friendly implementations in practice. Several possible issues led to such a development: (1) The complexity of the applications was criticized by several researchers (Basedow and Pundt 2001; Craig, Harris et al. 2002; Haklay and Tobon 2003; Steinmann, Krek et al. 2004); (2) the computer skills of the participants in public participation processes were not taken into consideration; and (3) the interaction with online interactive maps was rather complex and in many cases too difficult for non-GIS experts. Carver (2001: 64) pointed to the problem in the following way: "Access to GIS alone does not, however, provide the public user with a satisfactory means of active participation in the decision process. GIS is far too complex a technology to allow effective use by the nonspecialist with little or no previous training or experience in this field." More than a decade later, we experience emerging collaborative mapping processes in which citizens contribute their knowledge via open-source platforms such as OpenStreet Map. The researchers refer to these processes as "volunteered geographical information" (Goodchild 2007), "neogeography" (Turner 2006, Goodchild 2009), or "geography without geographers" (Sui 2008). This new development demonstrates the interest of the citizens to participate and use map-based participation tools. Perhaps now is the appropriate time for further developments of the PPGIS concept and its implementations. The aim of this paper is to study the implementation of a PPGIS with open-source technology and its integration with an online questionnaire. This research builds on the previous work in PPGIS and research conducted by Sidman, Swett et al. (2005) and Al-Kodmany (2001). Sidman, Swett et al. (2005) focused on the development of a paper, nondigital questionnaire that was sent to the participants of the survey in the mail. Their responses were manually inserted into a GIS and later communicated to the focus group. Al-Kodmany (2001) and his research colleagues at the University of Illinois at Chicago (UIC) developed an online survey tool, but a GIS program was used "only at a later stage for analyzing the composite participants' data and integrating it with other GIS layers" (Al-Kodmany 2001). This novel contribution is in the integration of an online questionnaire with interactive GIS-based maps. Specifically, it is in the technical implementation that enables the users to interact with a GIS-based map. The online questionnaire is directly linked to the interactive online map and the answers to the questionnaire and those answers entered on the map are stored in a GIS database on the server. No comparable implementation that presents a similar innovation of PPGIS has been found. …
[1]
R. Sieber.
Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework
,
2006
.
[2]
Donald A. Norman,et al.
Emotional design
,
2004,
UBIQ.
[3]
三嶋 博之.
The theory of affordances
,
2008
.
[4]
Colin Potts,et al.
Design of Everyday Things
,
1988
.
[5]
I. Turton,et al.
Web-based public participation geographical information systems: an aid to local environmental decision-making
,
2000
.
[6]
M D Meyer,et al.
RESEARCH AGENDA FOR THE 21ST CENTURY
,
2000
.
[7]
Clark C. Abt,et al.
Serious games
,
2016,
Springer International Publishing.
[8]
David R. Michael,et al.
Serious Games: Games That Educate, Train, and Inform
,
2005
.
[9]
Kheir Al-Kodmany,et al.
Online tools for public participation
,
2001,
Gov. Inf. Q..
[10]
Jennifer Preece,et al.
Electronic Survey Methodology: A Case Study in Reaching Hard-to-Involve Internet Users
,
2003,
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact..
[11]
Thomas Blaschke,et al.
Can Online Map-Based Applications Improve Citizen Participation?
,
2005,
TCGOV.
[12]
Claus Rinner,et al.
Argumentation Maps: GIS-Based Discussion Support for On-Line Planning
,
2001
.
[13]
A. Krek.
Rational Ignorance of the Citizens in Public Partic ipatory Planning
,
2005
.
[14]
Marc Schlossberg,et al.
Delineating "Public" and "Participation" in PPGIS
,
2003
.
[15]
J. Pickles.
Representations in an Electronic Age: Geography, GIS, and Democracy
,
1995
.
[16]
Jack L. Nasar,et al.
The evaluative image of the city
,
1997
.
[17]
Michael Zyda,et al.
From visual simulation to virtual reality to games
,
2005,
Computer.
[18]
C. Rinner.
Argumentation Mapping in Collaborative Spatial Decision Making
,
2006
.
[19]
A. Turner,et al.
Introduction to neogeography
,
2006
.
[20]
Jantien E. Stoter,et al.
Erratum to "Studying the use of geo-information in government - A conceptual framework" [Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 34(1) (2010) 70-78]
,
2010,
Computers, Environment and Urban Systems.
[21]
Piotr Jankowski,et al.
GIS for Group Decision Making
,
2001
.
[22]
M. Haklay.
Community participation and geographic information systems
,
2003
.
[23]
Daniel Z. Sui,et al.
The wikification of GIS and its consequences: Or Angelina Jolie's new tattoo and the future of GIS
,
2008,
Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..
[24]
S. Kiesler,et al.
Response Effects in the Electronic Survey
,
1986
.
[25]
E Talen,et al.
Constructing Neighborhoods from the Bottom up: The Case for Resident-Generated GIS
,
1999
.
[26]
Kevin B. Wright,et al.
Researching Internet-Based Populations: Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Survey Research, Online Questionnaire Authoring Software Packages, and Web Survey Services
,
2006,
J. Comput. Mediat. Commun..
[27]
Michael F. Goodchild,et al.
NeoGeography and the nature of geographic expertise
,
2009,
J. Locat. Based Serv..
[28]
Claus Rinner.
Computer support for discussions in spatial planning
,
2005
.
[29]
Alenka Poplin,et al.
Playful public participation in urban planning: A case study for online serious games
,
2012,
Comput. Environ. Urban Syst..
[30]
M. T. Thielsch,et al.
Online-Befragungen in der Praxis
,
2009
.
[31]
E. Reed.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
,
1989
.
[32]
Michael F. Goodchild,et al.
Towards Geodesign: Repurposing Cartography and GIS?
,
2010
.
[33]
Mordechai Haklay,et al.
Usability Engineering and PPGIS - Towards a Learning-improving Cycle
,
2002
.
[34]
Kevin Lynch,et al.
The Image of the City
,
1960
.
[35]
Michael F. Goodchild,et al.
Citizens as Voluntary Sensors: Spatial Data Infrastructure in the World of Web 2.0
,
2007,
Int. J. Spatial Data Infrastructures Res..