A Symbolic Exchange Framework for the Development of Intimate Relationships

It is argued that a synthesis of social exchange theory and symbolic interactionism may provide a useful framework for understanding and predicting the development of intimate relationships. A study was conducted to test a central proposition from this synthetic, “symbolic exchange” framework. Evidence was found to support predictions that couples in progressed relationships will show greater symbolic interdependence and that symbolic inter dependence associates positively with relationship commitment and with relationship satisfaction. Findings from the study provided support for the symbolic exchange framework against competing predictions from filter theories of relationship development and provide justification for a program of research investigating the symbolic exchange model.

[1]  H. Markman,et al.  Assessing the development of relationships: a new measure. , 1983, Family process.

[2]  F. A. Deseran,et al.  Trust and Symbolic Exchange , 1981 .

[3]  J. Gottman.  Marital Interaction: Experimental Investigations , 1980 .

[4]  Gary Alan Fine,et al.  Small Groups and Culture Creation: The Idioculture of Little League Baseball Teams , 1979 .

[5]  F. Nye,et al.  Social Exchange in Developing Relationships , 1979 .

[6]  B. I. Murstein,et al.  Who Will Marry Whom?: Theories and Research in Marital Choice. , 1978 .

[7]  Bernard I. Murstein,et al.  A Theory and Investigation of the Effect of Exchange-Orientation on Marriage and Friendship. , 1977 .

[8]  Gottman John,et al.  Behavior exchange theory and marital decision making. , 1976 .

[9]  G. C. Homans,et al.  Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms. , 1975 .

[10]  J. E. Nash,et al.  Symbolic Interactionism: Genesis, Varieties and Criticism , 1975 .

[11]  R. Centers.  Attitude Similarity-Dissimilarity as a Correlate of Heterosexual Attraction and Love , 1975 .

[12]  P. Watzlawick,et al.  Pragmatics of human communication , 1975 .

[13]  P. Singelmann.  Exchange as Symbolic Interaction: Convergences between Two Theoretical Perspectives , 1972 .

[14]  B. I. Murstein.  A thematic test and the Rorschach in predicting marital choice. , 1972, Journal of personality assessment.

[15]  Robert A. Lewis.  A Developmental Framework for the Analysis of Premarital Dyadic Formation , 1972 .

[16]  D. Olson,et al.  Separating and joining influences in courtship and early marriage. , 1971, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[17]  G. Levinger,et al.  Progress Toward Permanence in Courtship: A Test of the Kerckhoff-Davis Hypotheses' , 1970 .

[18]  B. I. Murstein.  Stimulus value role: A theory of marital choice. , 1970 .

[19]  Norman K. Denzin,et al.  SYMBOLIC INTERACTIONISM AND ETHNOMETHODOLOGY: A PROPOSED SYNTHESIS * , 1969 .

[20]  L. Navran.  Communication and Adjustment in Marriage , 1967 .

[21]  G. Levinger,et al.  Interpersonal attraction and agreement: a study of marriage partners. , 1966, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[22]  M. Katz.  Agreement on Connotative Meaning in Marriage , 1965 .

[23]  R. Rapoport.  The Transition from Engagement to Marriage , 1965 .

[24]  J. Trost.  Mate Selection, Marital Adjustment, and Symbolic Environment , 1965 .

[25]  A. B. Hollingshead,et al.  Social Class and Mental Illness , 1964 .

[26]  P. Berger,et al.  Marriage and the Construction of Reality , 1964 .

[27]  D. Byrne,et al.  SIMILARITY AND ASSUMED SIMILARITY OF ATTITUDES BETWEEN HUSBANDS AND WIVES. , 1963, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[28]  Keith E. Davis,et al.  Value consensus and need complementarity in mate selection. , 1962 .

[29]  T. Newcomb.  The acquaintance process , 1961 .

[30]  Charles D. Bolton.  Mate Selection as the Development of a Relationship , 1961 .

[31]  A. Gouldner.  THE NORM OF RECIPROCITY: A PRELIMINARY STATEMENT * , 1960 .

[32]  H. Locke,et al.  SHORT MARITAL ADJUSTMENT AND PREDICTION TESTS: THEIR RELIABILITY AND VALIDITY , 1959 .

[33]  R. Corsini.  Understanding and similarity in marriage. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[34]  T. Newcomb,et al.  Intra-family relationships in attitude. , 1937 .

[35]  G. Levinger.  6 – A Social Exchange View on the Dissolution of Pair Relationships1 , 1979 .

[36]  R. Alexander.  7 – Natural Selection and Social Exchange , 1979 .

[37]  E. Weinstein,et al.  Identities and Interactions: An Examination of Human Associations in Everyday Life , 1978 .

[38]  H. Kelley,et al.  Interpersonal relations: A theory of interdependence , 1978 .

[39]  C. Safilios-rothschild.  Love, sex, and sex roles , 1977 .

[40]  L. Whipple,et al.  Beginnings in relational communication , 1976 .

[41]  S. Duck,et al.  Personal relationships and personal constructs;: A study of friendship formation , 1973 .

[42]  D. Jackson,et al.  The Mirages of Marriage , 1968 .

[43]  Fredrick C. Redlich,et al.  Social class and mental illness: Community study. , 1958 .