The impact of diversity and equality management on firm performance: Beyond high performance work systems

This article demonstrates that a diversity and equality management system (DEMS) contributes to firm performance beyond the effects of a traditional high-performance work system (HPWS), which consists of bundles of work practices and policies used extensively in high-performing firms. A DEMS typically includes diversity training and monitoring recruitment, pay, and promotion across minority or other disadvantaged groups. Our analysis of quantitative data from service and manufacturing organizations in Ireland confirms that HPWS practices are associated with positive business performance and finds specifically that DEMS practices are positively associated with higher labor productivity and workforce innovation and lower voluntary employee turnover. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  Robin Schneider,et al.  From equality to diversity : a business case for equal opportunities , 1992 .

[2]  J. Fullerton,et al.  Managing the mosaic : diversity in action , 1994 .

[3]  Mark A. Huselid.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Turnover, Productivity, and Corporate Financial Performance , 1995 .

[4]  R. Klimoski,et al.  Why do ‘great minds’ think alike?: antecedents of team member schema agreement , 2001 .

[5]  J. Brockner,et al.  When Trust Matters: The Moderating Effect of Outcome Favorability , 1997 .

[6]  J. Wajcman,et al.  ‘Sameness’ and ‘Difference’ Revisited: Which Way Forward For Equal Opportunity Initiatives? , 1996 .

[7]  E. Ogbonna,et al.  Introduction: The Key Analytical Themes , 2001 .

[8]  C. M. Riordan,et al.  Relational demography within groups: Past developments, contradictions, and new directions , 2000 .

[9]  Jonathan S. Leonard,et al.  The effects of diversity on business performance: Report of the diversity research network , 2003 .

[10]  K. Macky,et al.  The relationship between ‘high-performance work practices’ and employee attitudes: an investigation of additive and interaction effects , 2007 .

[11]  R. Kanter.  The Change Masters , 1983 .

[12]  D. Lewin,et al.  Managing workforce diversity: macro and micro level HR implications of network analysis , 1996 .

[13]  N. Anderson,et al.  Measuring climate for work group innovation: development and validation of the team climate inventory , 1998 .

[14]  P. Iles.  Learning to work with difference , 1995 .

[15]  T. Cox,et al.  Managing cultural diversity: implications for organizational competitiveness , 1991 .

[16]  C. Ellis.  Diverse approaches to managing diversity , 1994 .

[17]  M. Konovsky,et al.  Citizenship Behavior and Social Exchange , 1994 .

[18]  L. Gardenswartz,et al.  Managing diversity in health care , 1999 .

[19]  Yvonne Benschop,et al.  Pride, prejudice and performance: relations between HRM, diversity and performance , 2001 .

[20]  H. Triandis.  The importance of contexts in studies of diversity. , 1995 .

[21]  S. Jackson,et al.  Diversity in social context: a multi-attribute, multilevel analysis of team diversity and sales performance , 2004 .

[22]  J. Guthrie.  High-Involvement Work Practices, Turnover, and Productivity: Evidence from New Zealand , 2001 .

[23]  J. Pfeffer.  Producing sustainable competitive advantage through the effective management of people , 1995 .

[24]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  West,et al.  Effective Top Management Teams: An International Perspective , 2001 .

[26]  B. Nolan,et al.  Disability and labour force participation in Ireland , 2004 .

[27]  William H. Glick,et al.  Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories , 1993 .

[28]  Joel Brockner,et al.  The moderating influence of procedural fairness on the relationship between work-life conflict and organizational commitment. , 2005, The Journal of applied psychology.

[29]  N. Adler.  International Dimensions of Organizational Behavior , 1986 .

[30]  O. Richard.  Racial Diversity, Business Strategy, and Firm Performance: A Resource-Based View , 2000 .

[31]  D. Bartz,et al.  A Model for Managing Workforce Diversity , 1990 .

[32]  Susan J. Lambert,et al.  Added Benefits: The Link Between Work-Life Benefits and Organizational Citizenship Behavior , 2000 .

[33]  J. Godard.  A Critical Assessment of the High-Performance Paradigm , 2004 .

[34]  J. Guthrie,et al.  High Performance Work Systems in Ireland - The Economic Case , 2005 .

[35]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  Strategic Human Resources Management: Where Do We Go From Here? , 2006 .

[36]  Sharon Mavin,et al.  What is managing diversity and why does it matter? , 2000 .

[37]  Derek R. Avery,et al.  RACIAL DIFFERENCES IN EMPLOYEE RETENTION: ARE DIVERSITY CLIMATE PERCEPTIONS THE KEY? , 2007 .

[38]  Anthony P. Carnevale,et al.  Diversity beyond the golden rule , 1994 .

[39]  J. Scott Armstrong,et al.  Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. , 1977 .

[40]  Charles Koeber,et al.  Manufacturing Advantage: Why High-Performance Work Systems Pay off , 1999 .

[41]  Patrick C. Flood,et al.  Knowledge and Innovation: Diffusion of HRM Systems , 2003 .

[42]  F. Schwartz,et al.  Management Women and the New Facts of Life , 1989 .

[43]  John Paul Macduffie.  Human Resource Bundles and Manufacturing Performance: Organizational Logic and Flexible Production Systems in the World Auto Industry , 1995 .

[44]  Sean A. Way.  High Performance Work Systems and Intermediate Indicators of Firm Performance Within the US Small Business Sector , 2002 .

[45]  Che Ronald A. Nykiel Cha.  Enhancing Quality Through Diversity , 1997 .

[46]  Devolving gender management in the public sector: opportunity or opt‐out? , 1998 .

[47]  Jeffrey B. Arthur,et al.  Effects of human resource systems on manufacturing performance and turnover , 1994 .

[48]  Robin J. Ely,et al.  Making Differences Matter: A New Paradigm for Managing Diversity , 1996 .

[49]  Robert L. Dipboye,et al.  Leveraging diversity to improve business performance: Research findings and recommendations for organizations , 2004 .

[50]  P. M. Podsakoff,et al.  Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects , 1986 .

[51]  S. Jackson,et al.  Recent Research on Team and Organizational Diversity: SWOT Analysis and Implications , 2003 .

[52]  Kamalesh Kumar,et al.  Process gain and process loss: Comparing interpersonal processes and performance of culturally diverse and non-diverse teams across time , 1998 .

[53]  James Guthrie,et al.  HUMAN RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND LABOR PRODUCTIVITY: DOES INDUSTRY MATTER? , 2005 .

[54]  John E. Delery,et al.  Alternative Conceptualizations of the Relationship Between Voluntary Turnover and Organizational Performance , 2005 .