Trust Evaluation using an Improved Context Similarity Measurement

In context-aware trust evaluation, using ontology tree is a popular approach to represent the relation between contexts. Usually, similarity between two contexts is computed using these trees. Therefore, the performance of trust evaluation highly depends on the quality of ontology trees. Fairness or granularity consistency is one of the major limitations affecting the quality of ontology tree. This limitation refers to inequality of semantic similarity in the most ontology trees. In other words, semantic similarity of every two adjacent nodes is unequal in these trees. It deteriorates the performance of contexts similarity computation. We overcome this limitation by weighting tree edges based on their semantic similarity. Weight of each edge is computed using Normalized Similarity Score (NSS) method. This method is based on frequencies of concepts (words) co-occurrences in the pages indexed by search engines. Our experiments represent the better performance of the proposed approach in comparison with established trust evaluation approaches. The suggested approach can enhance efficiency of any solution which models semantic relations by ontology tree.

[1]  Claudia Linnhoff-Popien,et al.  A Context Modeling Survey , 2004 .

[2]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  On the Behaviour of the TRSIM Model for Trust and Reputation , 2007, MATES.

[3]  Olivier Bonaventure,et al.  A Reputation-Based Approach for Securing Vivaldi Embedding System , 2007, EUNICE.

[4]  Mohammad Zulkernine,et al.  CAT: a context-aware trust model for open and dynamic systems , 2008, SAC '08.

[5]  Eva Klien,et al.  Using Term-Matching Algorithms for the Annotation of Geo-services , 2009, Knowledge Discovery Enhanced with Semantic and Social Information.

[6]  Gabriele Lenzini,et al.  Context-aware Trust Evaluation Functions for Dynamic Reconfigurable Systems , 2006, MTW.

[7]  Antonio F. Gómez-Skarmeta,et al.  A New Model for Trust and Reputation Management with an Ontology Based Approach for Similarity Between Tasks , 2006, MATES.

[8]  Vladislav D. Veksler,et al.  Defining the Dimensions of the Human Semantic Space , 2008 .

[9]  Svein J. Knapskog,et al.  Trust transferability among similar contexts , 2008, Q2SWinet '08.

[10]  Paul M. B. Vitányi,et al.  The Google Similarity Distance , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering.

[11]  Jane Yung-jen Hsu,et al.  Parameter learning of personalized trust models in broker-based distributed trust management , 2006, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[12]  Elisa Bertino,et al.  A Trust-Based Context-Aware Access Control Model for Web-Services , 2004, Proceedings. IEEE International Conference on Web Services, 2004..

[13]  Douglas B. Lenat,et al.  CYC: a large-scale investment in knowledge infrastructure , 1995, CACM.

[14]  Anind K. Dey,et al.  Understanding and Using Context , 2001, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[15]  George A. Miller,et al.  WordNet: A Lexical Database for English , 1995, HLT.

[16]  Matthai Philipose,et al.  Building Reliable Activity Models Using Hierarchical Shrinkage and Mined Ontology , 2006, Pervasive.

[17]  Bhavani M. Thuraisingham,et al.  Enhanced geographically typed semantic schema matching , 2011, J. Web Semant..

[18]  Peter Herrmann,et al.  Analogical Trust Reasoning , 2009, IFIPTM.

[19]  Ali A. Ghorbani,et al.  A Belief-Theoretic Reputation Estimation Model for Multi-context Communities , 2008, Canadian Conference on AI.

[20]  Christiane Fellbaum,et al.  Book Reviews: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database , 1999, CL.

[21]  Jennifer Widom,et al.  SimRank: a measure of structural-context similarity , 2002, KDD.

[22]  George A. Miller,et al.  Introduction to WordNet: An On-line Lexical Database , 1990 .

[23]  Valérie Issarny,et al.  Enhanced Reputation Mechanism for Mobile Ad Hoc Networks , 2004, iTrust.

[24]  Mehdi Shajari,et al.  An enhanced e-commerce trust model for community based centralized systems , 2012, Electron. Commer. Res..

[25]  Dunja Mladenic,et al.  Knowledge Discovery Enhanced with Semantic and Social Information , 2009, Studies in Computational Intelligence.

[26]  Il Im,et al.  An analysis of online customer complaints: implications for Web complaint management , 2002, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.