Development of deep learning model for prediction of chemotherapy response using PET images and radiomics features

Convolution neural network (CNN) was only consider their input images. It was only limitation of this technique for prediction of therapeutic response or patients outcome. The purpose of this study was to development of chemotherapy response prediction model using advanced deep learning techniques. 18F-FDG PET image was acquired in osteosarcoma patients (n=54) before the chemotherapy. The osteosarcoma patients was binary classification between responder (n=28) and non-responder (n=26). Radiomics feature was calculated using texture analysis method in 18F-FDG PET image. To improvement the deep learning model prediction accuracy, we performed the feature selection of information gain (IG) method. Deep learning models were define of CNN with radiomics features and without radiomics feature model. CNN was consist of 2 convolution layer and max pooling layers. Convolution and max pooling layers were generate the feature map. Advanced deep learning technique was input PET image as well as radiomics features. Radiomics features were concatenate with PET image feature map before the fully connected layer. Total 70 radiomics feature were extracted in 18F-FDG PET image of osteosarcoma patients before the chemotherapy. Total 9 radiomics features were selected by the above of the IG value 0.1. The prediction accuracy without radiomics feature model was 80%, On the other hand, the number of radiomics features , seventy, three, nine was 81, 82, 85% when they were worked with deep learning. mode. Nine radiomics features with deep learning model has better prediction accuracy than seventy radiomics feature. In this study, prediction accuracy of the selected radiomics features co-worked with deep learning model was higher than those of all features and only CNN model. Our developed prediction model will help to consider the radiomics feature as well as disease related feature such as genomics data.

[1]  June-Goo Lee,et al.  Deep Learning in Medical Imaging: General Overview , 2017, Korean journal of radiology.

[2]  Nikola Bogunovic,et al.  A review of feature selection methods with applications , 2015, 2015 38th International Convention on Information and Communication Technology, Electronics and Microelectronics (MIPRO).

[3]  M. Hatt,et al.  Comparison of Tumor Uptake Heterogeneity Characterization Between Static and Parametric 18F-FDG PET Images in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2016, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  N. Dessì,et al.  A Comparative Analysis of Biomarker Selection Techniques , 2013, BioMed research international.

[5]  J. Bomanji,et al.  18F-FDG PET/CT Imaging In Oncology , 2011, Annals of Saudi medicine.

[6]  Vicky Goh,et al.  Challenges and Promises of PET Radiomics , 2018, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  M. Hatt,et al.  18F-FDG PET Uptake Characterization Through Texture Analysis: Investigating the Complementary Nature of Heterogeneity and Functional Tumor Volume in a Multi–Cancer Site Patient Cohort , 2015, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  Hung-Ming Wang,et al.  Development and Evaluation of an Open-Source Software Package “CGITA” for Quantifying Tumor Heterogeneity with Molecular Images , 2014, BioMed research international.

[9]  Holly Zhou,et al.  Treatment effects in pediatric soft tissue and bone tumors: practical considerations for the pathologist. , 2005, American journal of clinical pathology.

[10]  Peter Smeets,et al.  Predictive and prognostic value of metabolic tumour volume and total lesion glycolysis in solid tumours , 2012, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[11]  P. Lambin,et al.  Exploratory Study to Identify Radiomics Classifiers for Lung Cancer Histology , 2016, Front. Oncol..