Framework for planning the mobility service based on autonomous vehicles

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) facilitate alteration in the passenger transportation. Shared, demand-driven mobility services based on small-capacity AVs emerge in urban areas. In order to provide highly personalized services and to enhance the acceptance of AVs, the user expectations are to be revealed. The research question is what kind of information is needed to plan various service types with the consideration of user expectations and operational constraints. Accordingly, the planning functions, as well as their input and output data have been identified. Then, the connections between the functions have been explored. In order to provide input data for planning functions, we have elaborated a data collection method applying a questionnaire survey with stated preferences. Based on the survey data correlations could be revealed between socio-demographic characteristics or mobility habits and expected mobility service attributes. The results can be used as a framework for planning mobility services based on AVs.

[1]  Nick Hounsell,et al.  Public Views towards Implementation of Automated Vehicles in Urban Areas , 2016 .

[2]  Joseph M. Stanford,et al.  Assessing the long-term effects of autonomous vehicles: a speculative approach , 2016 .

[3]  David Cebon,et al.  An autonomous taxi service for sustainable urban transportation , 2017, 2017 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP).

[4]  Ondřej Přibyl,et al.  Automated vehicles in smart urban environment: A review , 2017, 2017 Smart City Symposium Prague (SCSP).

[5]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Acceptance of Automated Road Transport Systems (ARTS): An adaptation of the UTAUT model , 2016 .

[6]  Niels A. H. Agatz,et al.  The Benefits of Meeting Points in Ride-Sharing Systems , 2015 .

[7]  Natasha Merat,et al.  User acceptance of automated shuttles in Berlin-Schöneberg: A questionnaire study , 2018, Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour.

[8]  Csaba Csiszár,et al.  Information Management of Demand-responsive Mobility Service Based on Autonomous Vehicles , 2017 .

[9]  Thomas M. Haladyna Guidelines for Developing MC Items , 2004 .

[10]  Jacek Żak,et al.  Design of Passenger Public Transportation Solutions Based on Autonomous Vehicles and Their Multiple Criteria Comparison with Traditional Forms of Passenger Transportation , 2015 .

[11]  Vincent Kaufmann,et al.  Pioneering Driverless Electric Vehicles in Europe: The City Automated Transport System (CATS) , 2016 .

[12]  Yoram Shiftan,et al.  Scenario building as a tool for planning a sustainable transportation system , 2003 .

[13]  Temple,et al.  Developing Likert-Scale Questionnaires , 2014 .

[14]  Ke Xu,et al.  Understanding passenger reaction to dynamic prices in ride-on-demand service , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PerCom Workshops).

[15]  A. Várhelyi,et al.  The Definition of Acceptance and Acceptability , 2018, Driver Acceptance of New Technology.

[16]  Natasha Merat,et al.  Human Factors, User Requirements, and User Acceptance of Ride-Sharing In Automated Vehicles , 2017 .

[17]  Rico Krueger,et al.  Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles , 2016 .

[18]  Omar J. Ibarra-Rojas,et al.  Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: A literature review , 2015 .

[19]  Csaba Csiszár,et al.  System Model for Autonomous Road Freight Transportation , 2018 .

[20]  P. D. Site,et al.  Users’ Preferences towards Automated Road Public Transport: Results from European Surveys , 2014 .

[21]  Kara M. Kockelman,et al.  The Travel and Environmental Implications of Shared Autonomous Vehicles, Using Agent-Based Model Scenarios , 2014 .

[22]  G. Laporte,et al.  Transportation Demand , 2019, Energy: Supply and Demand.

[23]  M. Quddus,et al.  A survey of Demand Responsive Transport in Great Britain , 2012 .

[24]  István Varga,et al.  Impacts of Autonomous Cars from a Traffic Engineering Perspective , 2016 .