The social Simon effect in the tactile sensory modality: a negative finding

This study seeks to investigate whether users activate cognitive representations of their partner’s action when they are involved in tactile collaborative tasks. The social Simon effect is a spatial stimulus–response interference induced by the mere presence of a partner in a go/nogo task. It has been extensively studied in the visual and auditory sensory modalities, but never before in the tactile modality. We compared the performances of 28 participants in three tasks: (1) a standard Simon task where participants responded to two different tactile stimuli applied to their fingertips with either their left or right foot, (2) an individual go/nogo task where participants responded to only one stimulus and (3) a social go/nogo task where they again responded to only one stimulus, but were partnered with another person who responded to the complementary stimulus. The interference effect due to spatial incongruence between the side where participants received the stimulus and the foot used to answer increased significantly in the standard Simon task compared to the social go/nogo task. Such a difference was not observed between the social and individual go/nogo tasks. Performances were nevertheless enhanced in the social go/nogo task, but irrespectively of the stimulus–response congruency. This study is the first to report a negative result for the social Simon effect in the tactile modality. Results suggest that cognitive representation of the co-actor is weaker in this modality.

[1]  Karl Christoph Klauer,et al.  The Joint Flanker Effect and the Joint Simon Effect: On the Comparability of Processes Underlying Joint Compatibility Effects , 2017, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Markus A. Maier,et al.  The role of positive and negative affect in the “mirroring” of other persons' actions , 2010 .

[3]  W. Prinz,et al.  Trial-to-trial sequential dependencies in a social and non-social Simon task , 2011, Psychological research.

[4]  B. Hommel,et al.  Up to “Me” or Up to “Us”? The Impact of Self-Construal Priming on Cognitive Self-Other Integration , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[5]  Timothy N Welsh,et al.  When 1+1=1: the unification of independent actors revealed through joint Simon effects in crossed and uncrossed effector conditions. , 2009, Human movement science.

[6]  Elena Rusconi,et al.  Sharing a task or sharing space? On the effect of the confederate in action coding in a detection task , 2010, Cognition.

[7]  J. R. Simon,et al.  Reactions toward the source of stimulation. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[8]  Markus Lappe,et al.  When humanoid robots become human-like interaction partners: corepresentation of robotic actions. , 2012, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[9]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  The (not so) social Simon effect: a referential coding account. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Avishai Henik,et al.  In touch with the Simon effect. , 2014, Experimental psychology.

[11]  W. Prinz,et al.  Representing others' actions: just like one's own? , 2003, Cognition.

[12]  M. McCloskey,et al.  Somatotopic representation of location: evidence from the Simon effect. , 2014, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Is it really my turn? An event-related fMRI study of task sharing , 2007, Social neuroscience.

[14]  Wen-Jui Kuo,et al.  Action Co-representation is Tuned to Other Humans , 2008, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  U. Frith,et al.  Mindblind Eyes: An Absence of Spontaneous Theory of Mind in Asperger Syndrome , 2009, Science.

[16]  Dorit Wenke,et al.  Effects of feature integration in a hands-crossed version of the Social Simon paradigm , 2013, Psychological research.

[17]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[18]  B. Sabbe,et al.  Neurophysiological evidence for diminished monitoring of own, but intact monitoring of other's errors in schizophrenia , 2015, Psychiatry Research.

[19]  S. Baron-Cohen,et al.  The Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ): Evidence from Asperger Syndrome/High-Functioning Autism, Malesand Females, Scientists and Mathematicians , 2001, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[20]  B. Hommel,et al.  The joint Simon effect depends on perceived agency, but not intentionality, of the alternative action , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[21]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Morphometric gray matter differences of the medial frontal cortex influence the social Simon effect , 2012, NeuroImage.

[22]  Arcangelo Merla,et al.  Studying social cognition using near-infrared spectroscopy: the case of social Simon effect , 2013, Journal of biomedical optics.

[23]  W. Prinz,et al.  Far from action-blind: Representation of others' actions in individuals with Autism , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  Heather F. Neyedli,et al.  Joint Simon Effects in Extrapersonal Space , 2013, Journal of motor behavior.

[25]  K. C. Klauer,et al.  Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: A response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects , 2012, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[26]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  The Virtual Co-Actor: The Social Simon Effect does not Rely on Online Feedback from the Other , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[27]  C. Frith,et al.  Social cognition in the we-mode , 2013, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[28]  Roman Liepelt,et al.  Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect , 2016, Psychological research.

[29]  Marcel Brass,et al.  Does the Human Motor System Simulate Pinocchio's Actions? , 2007, Psychological science.

[30]  Henk Aarts,et al.  When competition merges people's behavior: Interdependency activates shared action representations , 2010 .

[31]  Yves Guiard,et al.  The effects of intensity and irrelevant location of a tactile stimulation in a choice reaction time task , 1992, Neuropsychologia.

[32]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Keys and seats: Spatial response coding underlying the joint spatial compatibility effect , 2013, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[33]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  How Social Are Task Representations? , 2009, Psychological science.

[34]  R. Nicoletti,et al.  The role of group membership on the modulation of joint action , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[35]  Wolfgang Prinz,et al.  Twin Peaks: An ERP Study of Action Planning and Control in Coacting Individuals , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.