Event-related fMRI in cognition

A primary advantage of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) over other techniques in neuroscience is its flexibility. Researchers have used fMRI to study a remarkable diversity of topics, from basic processes of perception and memory, to the complex mechanisms of economic decision making and moral cognition. The chief contributor to this experimental flexibility-indeed, to the growth of fMRI itself-has been the development of event-related experimental designs and associated analyses. The core idea of an event-related design, as first articulated in the late 1990s, is the separation of cognitive processes into discrete points in time (i.e., "events") allowing differentiation of their associated fMRI signals. By modeling brain function as a series of transient changes, rather than as an ongoing state, event-related fMRI allowed researchers to create much more complex paradigms and more dynamic analysis methods. Yet, this flexibility came with a cost. As the complexity of experimental designs increased, fMRI analyses became increasingly abstracted from the original data, which in turn has had consequences both positive (e.g., greater use of model-based fMRI) and negative (e.g., fewer articles plot the timing of activation). And, as event-related methods have become ubiquitous, they no longer represent a distinct category of fMRI research. In a real sense, event-related fMRI has now become, simply, fMRI.

[1]  L. Shah,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging. , 2010, Seminars in roentgenology.

[2]  E. John,et al.  Evoked-Potential Correlates of Stimulus Uncertainty , 1965, Science.

[3]  D. Heeger,et al.  Linear Systems Analysis of Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Human V1 , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[4]  R. S. Hinks,et al.  Time course EPI of human brain function during task activation , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[5]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Prefrontal Activation Evoked by Infrequent Target and Novel Stimuli in a Visual Target Detection Task: An Event-Related Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[6]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Dissociating Valence of Outcome from Behavioral Control in Human Orbital and Ventral Prefrontal Cortices , 2003, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Perceiving patterns in random series: dynamic processing of sequence in prefrontal cortex , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  Yul-Wan Sung,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging , 2004, Scholarpedia.

[9]  Evan M. Gordon,et al.  Neural Signatures of Economic Preferences for Risk and Ambiguity , 2006, Neuron.

[10]  A M Dale,et al.  Randomized event‐related experimental designs allow for extremely rapid presentation rates using functional MRI , 1998, Neuroreport.

[11]  R. Buckner,et al.  Human Brain Mapping 6:373–377(1998) � Event-Related fMRI and the Hemodynamic Response , 2022 .

[12]  G. Mangun,et al.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[13]  J. Desmond,et al.  Making memories: brain activity that predicts how well visual experience will be remembered. , 1998, Science.

[14]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Comparing event-related and epoch analysis in blocked design fMRI , 2003, NeuroImage.

[15]  A. Dale,et al.  Selective averaging of rapidly presented individual trials using fMRI , 1997, Human brain mapping.

[16]  P. Bandettini,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity of the Nonlinear Dynamics in the FMRI BOLD Response , 2001, NeuroImage.

[17]  J. C. Gore,et al.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging in a visual oddball task , 1996, NeuroImage.

[18]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Dynamic mapping of the human visual cortex by high-speed magnetic resonance imaging. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  R. Benson,et al.  Responses to rare visual target and distractor stimuli using event-related fMRI. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  fMR-adaptation: a tool for studying the functional properties of human cortical neurons. , 2001, Acta psychologica.

[21]  A. Dale,et al.  Building memories: remembering and forgetting of verbal experiences as predicted by brain activity. , 1998, Science.

[22]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  Regional Differences in the Refractory Period of the Hemodynamic Response: An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2001, NeuroImage.

[23]  P. Goldman-Rakic,et al.  Infrequent events transiently activate human prefrontal and parietal cortex as measured by functional MRI. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  G. McCarthy,et al.  The Effects of Aging upon the Hemodynamic Response Measured by Functional MRI , 2001, NeuroImage.

[25]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Evidence for a Refractory Period in the Hemodynamic Response to Visual Stimuli as Measured by MRI , 2000, NeuroImage.

[26]  R. Turner,et al.  Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of human brain activity during primary sensory stimulation. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Modulation of early auditory processing during selective listening to rapidly presented tones. , 1991, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[28]  Lin Yang,et al.  Linear and nonlinear relationships between visual stimuli, EEG and BOLD fMRI signals , 2010, NeuroImage.

[29]  Scott A. Huettel,et al.  The BOLD fMRI refractory effect is specific to stimulus attributes: evidence from a visual motion paradigm , 2004, NeuroImage.

[30]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Model‐Based fMRI and Its Application to Reward Learning and Decision Making , 2007, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.