No farmer left behind in sustainable biofuel production

Societal concerns about the social and environmental impacts of biofuel production are driving producers to adopt better management practices. Existing certification schemes for sustainable biofuel production are, however, biased towards industrial-scale producers that have the financial capital and economies of scale to meet sustainability and certification objectives. Smallholder farmers in developing countries, by contrast, often lack the means and capacity to do so. Some of the challenges faced by smallholders include high certification costs, insufficient institutional capacity, inadequate financial and social incentives, poor group organization and lack of external support. Drawing lessons from existing certification programs, we argue that proponents of sustainable practices and standards must fully appreciate the complex realities of smallholder production systems. We provide policy recommendations for ensuring that no farmer is left behind in the quest to increase sustainable biofuel production.

[1]  J. Neilson,et al.  Global Private Regulation and Value-Chain Restructuring in Indonesian Smallholder Coffee Systems , 2008 .

[2]  P. Knorringa,et al.  Inclusive Improvement: Standards And Smallholders: Taking Stock and Moving On , 2009 .

[3]  S. Keam,et al.  Implementing sustainable bioenergy production: a compilation of tools and approaches. , 2008 .

[4]  S. Zarrilli Making Certification Work for Sustainable Development: The Case of Biofuels , 2009 .

[5]  S. Polasky,et al.  Land Clearing and the Biofuel Carbon Debt , 2008, Science.

[6]  A. Leslie,et al.  The Impacts and Mechanics of Certification , 2004 .

[7]  Martin Junginger,et al.  Overview of recent developments in sustainable biomass certification , 2007 .

[8]  A. Faaij,et al.  From the global efforts on certification of bioenergy towards an integrated approach based on sustainable land use planning , 2010 .

[9]  Pablo Pacheco,et al.  The local social and environmental impacts of biofuel feedstock expansion: a synthesis of case studies from Asia, Africa and Latin America , 2010 .

[10]  A. J. Graffham,et al.  Fresh Insights Number 5. Impact of EurepGAP on small-scale vegetable growers in Zambia , 2007 .

[11]  Lucas Reijnders,et al.  Biofuel Plantations on Forested Lands: Double Jeopardy for Biodiversity and Climate , 2009, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[12]  Esther S. Parish,et al.  Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems , 2011 .

[13]  M. Zeller,et al.  Justified hopes or utopian thinking? The suitability of coffee certification schemes as a business model for small-scale producers , 2009 .

[14]  B. Swallow,et al.  Localizing demand and supply of environmental services: interactions with property rights, collective action and the welfare of the poor , 2005 .

[15]  J. Innes,et al.  Private Cost-Benefits of Voluntary Forest Product Certification , 2010 .

[16]  Stephan Dohrn,et al.  Collective action for smallholder market access , 2009 .

[17]  K. Cadoret,et al.  Organic certification and the UK market: organic imports from developing countries , 2002 .

[18]  Daniele Giovannucci,et al.  Standards as a new form of social contract? Sustainability initiatives in the coffee industry , 2005 .

[19]  R. Meinzen-Dick,et al.  Special Section: Collective action for smallholder market access. , 2009 .

[20]  Mark Lundy,et al.  Business models that are inclusive of small farmers , 2009 .

[21]  Mahfuzuddin Ahmed,et al.  Biofuels production for smallholder producers in the Greater Mekong Sub-region , 2009 .

[22]  Göran Berndes,et al.  Sustainability certification of bioethanol: how is it perceived by Brazilian stakeholders? , 2010 .

[23]  J. Hellin,et al.  Farmer organization, collective action and market access in Meso-America: , 2009 .

[24]  D. Robinson Certification in communally managed forests: perspectives from Mexico. , 2000 .

[25]  S. Filoso,et al.  Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. , 2008, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[26]  Cora Dankers,et al.  ENVIRONMENTAL AND SOCIAL STANDARDS, CERTIFICATION AND LABELLING FOR CASH CROPS , 2003 .

[27]  C. D. Silva,et al.  Agro-industries for development , 2009 .

[28]  T. Sugino,et al.  Impact analysis of expanding biomass energy use to rural poverty in tropical Asia , 2008 .