Falsified papers in high-impact journals were slow to retract and indistinguishable from nonfraudulent papers.
暂无分享,去创建一个
John P A Ioannidis | Evangelos Evangelou | J. Ioannidis | E. Evangelou | N. Trikalinos | Nikolaos A Trikalinos
[1] C. Scully,et al. Fraud in scientific publishing. , 2006, Oral diseases.
[2] P. Gerber. What can we learn from the Hwang and Sudbø affairs? , 2006, The Medical journal of Australia.
[3] H. Sox,et al. Research Misconduct, Retraction, and Cleansing the Medical Literature: Lessons from the Poehlman Case , 2006, Annals of Internal Medicine.
[4] Johan Dahlberg,et al. The poehlman case: running away from the truth , 2006, Science and engineering ethics.
[5] Richard Smith,et al. Investigating the previous studies of a fraudulent author , 2005, BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[6] J. Ioannidis. Contradicted and initially stronger effects in highly cited clinical research. , 2005, JAMA.
[7] M. Farthing. Retractions in Gut 10 years after publication , 2001, Gut.
[8] M. Farthing. Coping with fraud , 1998, The Lancet.
[9] D. Cooper-Mahkorn. Many journals have not retracted “fraudulent” research , 1998, BMJ.
[10] Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An American perspective on research integrity. , 1998, BMJ.
[11] Q. Schiermeier. Authors slow to retract ‘fraudulent’ papers , 1998, Nature.
[12] Farthing Mj. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud. , 1998 .
[13] M. Farthing. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud. , 1998, Lancet.
[14] R. Dalton. Collins' student sanctioned over ‘most severe’ case of fraud , 1997, Nature.
[15] W P Whitely,et al. The scientific community's response to evidence of fraudulent publication. The Robert Slutsky case. , 1994, JAMA.
[16] D. Rennie. Breast cancer: how to mishandle misconduct. , 1994, JAMA.
[17] D. Rennie,et al. Scientific misconduct. New definition, procedures, and office--perhaps a new leaf. , 1993, JAMA.
[18] P. Aldhous. Scientific misconduct. Tragedy revealed in Zurich. , 1992, Nature.
[19] D. Klein. Scientific fraud and misconduct. , 1991, Journal of clinical psychopharmacology.
[20] M. Pfeifer,et al. The continued use of retracted, invalid scientific literature. , 1990, JAMA.
[21] S Lock,et al. Fraud in medicine , 1988, British medical journal.
[22] B. Culliton. NIH to review Emory in Darsee case. , 1983, Science.
[23] B. Culliton. Darsee apologizes to New England Journal. , 1983, Science.