New Statistical Methods for Constructing Robust Differential Correlation Networks to characterize the interactions among microRNAs

The interplay among microRNAs (miRNAs) plays an important role in the developments of complex human diseases. Co-expression networks can characterize the interactions among miRNAs. Differential correlation network is a powerful tool to investigate the differences of co-expression networks between cases and controls. To construct a differential correlation network, the Fisher’s Z-transformation test is usually used. However, the Fisher’s Z-transformation test requires the normality assumption, the violation of which would result in inflated Type I error rate. Several bootstrapping-based improvements for Fisher’s Z test have been proposed. However, these methods are too computationally intensive to be used to construct differential correlation networks for high-throughput genomic data. In this article, we proposed six novel robust equal-correlation tests that are computationally efficient. The systematic simulation studies and a real microRNA data analysis showed that one of the six proposed tests (ST5) overall performed better than other methods.

[1]  David C. Hoaglin,et al.  Summarizing Shape Numerically: The g‐and‐h Distributions , 2011 .

[2]  Koji Tsuda,et al.  ROS-DET: robust detector of switching mechanisms in gene expression , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Network biology: understanding the cell's functional organization , 2004, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[4]  Wei-qun Chen,et al.  GnRH participates in the self-renewal of A549-derived lung cancer stem-like cells through upregulation of the JNK signaling pathway. , 2015, Oncology reports.

[5]  Joshua M. Stuart,et al.  A Gene-Coexpression Network for Global Discovery of Conserved Genetic Modules , 2003, Science.

[6]  Francisco Cribari-Neto,et al.  Asymptotic inference under heteroskedasticity of unknown form , 2004, Comput. Stat. Data Anal..

[7]  Rand Wilcox Chapter 10 – Robust Regression , 2012 .

[8]  V. Ambros The functions of animal microRNAs , 2004, Nature.

[9]  Haihong Yang,et al.  Regulation of calcium signaling in lung cancer. , 2010, Journal of thoracic disease.

[10]  David C. Hoaglin,et al.  g -and-h-Distributions† , 2006 .

[11]  G. Zou Toward using confidence intervals to compare correlations. , 2007, Psychological methods.

[12]  Tao Wang,et al.  A Powerful Statistical Method for Identifying Differentially Methylated Markers in Complex Diseases , 2012, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[13]  Julia Kastner,et al.  Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing , 2005 .

[14]  Michelle Girvan,et al.  Finding New Order in Biological Functions from the Network Structure of Gene Annotations , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[15]  Xing Chen,et al.  MicroRNAs and complex diseases: from experimental results to computational models , 2019, Briefings Bioinform..

[16]  Edwin K Silverman,et al.  Network medicine approaches to the genetics of complex diseases. , 2012, Discovery medicine.

[17]  D. Bartel MicroRNAs Genomics, Biogenesis, Mechanism, and Function , 2004, Cell.

[18]  J. Jen,et al.  TGF-&bgr; Signaling and the Role of Inhibitory Smads in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer , 2010, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[19]  P. Diaconis Theories of Data Analysis: From Magical Thinking Through Classical Statistics , 2011 .

[20]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .

[21]  Rand R. Wilcox,et al.  Comparing Pearson Correlations: Dealing with Heteroscedasticity and Nonnormality , 2009, Commun. Stat. Simul. Comput..

[22]  C. K. Hsiao,et al.  miRSystem: An Integrated System for Characterizing Enriched Functions and Pathways of MicroRNA Targets , 2012, PloS one.