Usefulness of Hirsch’s h-index to evaluate scientific research in Spain

The applicability of Hirsch’s h index (Hirsch, 2005) for evaluating scientific research in Spain has been investigated. A series of derivative indexes that take into account: i) the overall low scientific production in Spain before the’ 80s; ii) differences among areas due to size (overall number of citations for publications in a given area); and iii) the number of authors, are suggested. Their applicability has been tested for two different areas in the Biological Sciences. The proposed set of indexes accurately summarizes both the success and evolution of scientists’ careers in Spain, and it may be useful in the evaluation of other not well established national scientific research systems.

[1]  A. Mulligan,et al.  Is peer review in crisis? , 2005, Oral oncology.

[2]  Philip Ball,et al.  Index aims for fair ranking of scientists , 2005, Nature.

[3]  M. Amin,et al.  Impact factors: use and abuse. , 2003, Medicina.

[4]  Emilio Delgado López-Cózar,et al.  The evolution of research activity in Spain , 2003, Research Policy.

[5]  W. Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals [1] , 2005 .

[6]  P. Seglen,et al.  Education and debate , 1999, The Ethics of Public Health.

[7]  J. E. Hirsch,et al.  An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output , 2005, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA.

[8]  A A Sandberg,et al.  The journal "impact factor": a misnamed, misleading, misused measure. , 1998, Cancer genetics and cytogenetics.

[9]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  A Hirsch-type index for journals , 2006, Scientometrics.

[10]  Lutz Bornmann,et al.  Does the h-index for ranking of scientists really work? , 2005, Scientometrics.

[11]  Mônica G. Campiteli,et al.  Is it possible to compare researchers with different scientific interests? , 2006, Scientometrics.