Assessing Urban Forest Canopy Cover Using Airborne or Satellite Imagery

With the availability of many sources of imagery and various digital classification techniques, assessing urban forest canopy cover is readily accessible to most urban forest managers. Understanding the capability and limitations of various types of imagery and classification methods is essential to interpreting canopy cover values. An overview of several remote sensing techniques used to assess urban forest canopy cover is presented. A case study comparing canopy cover percentages for Syracuse, New York, U.S. interprets the multiple values developed using different methods. Most methods produce relatively similar results, but the estimate based on the National Land Cover Database is much lower.

[1]  C. Small,et al.  Estimation and vicarious validation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis , 2006 .

[2]  J. Campbell.  Introduction to remote sensing , 1987 .

[3]  J. Dwyer,et al.  Understanding the Benefits and Costs of Urban Forest Ecosystems , 2007 .

[4]  Siamak Khorram,et al.  Land-cover change detection enhanced with generalized linear models , 1999 .

[5]  D. Nowak,et al.  Connecting People With Ecosystems in the 21 st Century: An Assessment of Our Nation's Urban Forests Connecting People With Ecosystems in the 21 st Century: An Assessment of Our Nation's Urban Forests , 2000 .

[6]  J. Briggs,et al.  An Object-oriented Approach to Urban Forest Mapping in Phoenix , 2007 .

[7]  Suwen Wang.  An analysis of urban tree communities using Landsat Thematic Mapper data , 1988 .

[8]  W. Zipperer,et al.  Urban tree cover: an ecological perspective , 1997, Urban Ecosystems.

[9]  Difficulties with estimating city-wide urban forest cover change from national, remotely-sensed tree canopy maps , 2008, Urban Ecosystems.

[10]  A. Troy,et al.  An object‐oriented approach for analysing and characterizing urban landscape at the parcel level , 2008 .

[11]  E. Gregory McPherson,et al.  Assessing the Benefits and Costs of the Urban Forest , 1992, Arboriculture & Urban Forestry.

[12]  Paul F. Hopkins,et al.  Urban cover mapping using digital, high-spatial resolution aerial imagery , 2001, Urban Ecosystems.

[13]  Limin Yang,et al.  A STRATEGY FOR ESTIMATING TREE CANOPY DENSITY USING LANDSAT 7 ETM+ AND HIGH RESOLUTION IMAGES OVER LARGE AREAS , 2001 .

[14]  C. Small.  Estimation of urban vegetation abundance by spectral mixture analysis , 2001 .

[15]  R. Rowntree.  Forest canopy cover and land use in four Eastern United States cities , 1984 .

[16]  Louis R. Iverson,et al.  Urban forest cover of the Chicago region and its relation to household density and income , 2000, Urban Ecosystems.

[17]  Zhiliang Zhu,et al.  Forest density mapping in the lower 48 states: A regression procedure. Forest Service research paper , 1994 .

[18]  J. C. Stevens,et al.  Measuring and analyzing urban tree cover , 1996 .

[19]  J. Wickham,et al.  Completion of the 2001 National Land Cover Database for the conterminous United States , 2007 .

[20]  Yun Zhang,et al.  Texture-Integrated Classification of Urban Treed Areas in High-Resolution Color-Infrared Imagery , 2001 .