Risk-informed sensitivity analysis and optimization of seismic mitigation strategy using Gaussian process surrogate model

Abstract This work aims to develop a method to derive the optimal parameters of seismic mitigation devices for achieving the minimum system seismic risk, which is derived by accounting for the correlation between each individual components risk. Gaussian process surrogate model (GPSM) is used to illustrate the functional relationship between seismic risk and the variables of the mitigation devices, and then both sensitivity analysis and parameter optimization are carried out. Specifically, global sensitivity analysis (GSA), which is powerful for assessing the relative importance of parameters of the isolation devices, is achieved through the use of GPSM; the parameter optimization can be efficiently conducted to find the minimum seismic risk. A cable-stayed bridge model is established to demonstrate the application of the proposed GPSM-based method of sensitivity analysis and optimization of seismic isolation devices. The fluid viscous damper (FVD) which provides additional damper and stiffness is selected to illustrate the procedure of the multi-object optimization of seismic isolation devices on cable-stayed bridges. The seismic risk is calculated by integrating probabilistic seismic hazard analysis (PSHA), probabilistic seismic demand analysis (PADA), and probabilistic damage states, incorporating important sources of nonlinearity and uncertainties. Component-level objectives and one system-level object are considered, and the optimal parameters (damping coefficient Cd and exponent α) are determined. The results demonstrate that the GPSM-based is effective and efficient for sensitivity analysis and optimization of seismic isolation devices.

[1]  Hui Li,et al.  Seismic response control of a cable‐stayed bridge using negative stiffness dampers , 2011 .

[2]  Masanobu Shinozuka,et al.  Shape-Memory-Alloy supplemented Lead Rubber Bearing (SMA-LRB) for seismic isolation , 2015 .

[3]  Michael H. Scott,et al.  Nonlinear Finite-Element Analysis Software Architecture Using Object Composition , 2010, J. Comput. Civ. Eng..

[4]  W. Yuan,et al.  Near-fault seismic risk assessment of simply supported bridges , 2020 .

[5]  R. S. Jangid Optimum lead–rubber isolation bearings for near-fault motions , 2007 .

[6]  Gian Paolo Cimellaro,et al.  Seismic reliability of a cable-stayed bridge retrofitted with hysteretic devices , 2008 .

[7]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility methodology for highway bridges using a component level approach , 2006 .

[8]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Statistical Framework for Sensitivity Analysis of Structural Dynamic Characteristics , 2017 .

[9]  Seung-Yong Ok,et al.  Optimal design of hysteretic dampers connecting adjacent structures using multi-objective genetic algorithm and stochastic linearization method , 2008 .

[10]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: Theory , 2008 .

[11]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Fractional order intensity measures for probabilistic seismic demand modeling applied to highway bridges , 2012 .

[12]  Wei-Xin Ren,et al.  Parameter Selection in Finite-Element-Model Updating by Global Sensitivity Analysis Using Gaussian Process Metamodel , 2015 .

[13]  Michael C. Constantinou,et al.  Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: Experimental verification , 2008 .

[14]  Xiaowei Wang,et al.  Transverse seismic failure mechanism and ductility of reinforced concrete pylon for long span cable-stayed bridges: Model test and numerical analysis , 2019, Engineering Structures.

[15]  Camillo Nuti,et al.  TO RETROFIT OR NOT TO RETROFIT , 2003 .

[16]  Bassem O Andrawes,et al.  Application of shape memory alloy dampers in the seismic control of cable-stayed bridges , 2009 .

[17]  M. Shahria Alam,et al.  Seismic Fragility Assessment of Concrete Bridge Pier Reinforced with Superelastic Shape Memory Alloy , 2015 .

[18]  R. S. Jangid Stochastic Response of Bridges Seismically Isolated by Friction Pendulum System , 2008 .

[19]  Christian Bucher,et al.  Probability-based optimal design of friction-based seismic isolation devices , 2009 .

[20]  Jianzhong Li,et al.  Performance Test of Energy Dissipation Bearing and Its Application in Seismic Control of a Long-Span Bridge , 2010 .

[21]  Li Wu,et al.  Seismic assessment of deep water bridges in reservoir considering hydrodynamic effects using endurance time analysis , 2020 .

[22]  T. K. Datta,et al.  Seismic risk analysis of modified fan type cable stayed bridges , 2006 .

[23]  W. Yuan,et al.  Optimal Seismic Intensity Measure Selection for Isolated Bridges under Pulse-Like Ground Motions , 2019 .

[24]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic fragility assessment of long-span cable-stayed bridges in China , 2016 .

[25]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Seismic retrofit of simply supported bridges using shape memory alloys , 2002 .

[26]  Jong-Su Jeon,et al.  Risk assessment for a long-span cable-stayed bridge subjected to multiple support excitations , 2018, Engineering Structures.

[27]  Hirokazu Iemura,et al.  Optimum Design of Resilient Sliding Isolation System for Seismic Protection of Equipments , 2007 .

[28]  Diego Lopez-Garcia,et al.  Multi‐objective risk‐informed design of floor isolation systems , 2016 .

[29]  Wei Zhang,et al.  Seismic Design of a Long-Span Cable-Stayed Bridge with Fluid Viscous Dampers , 2016 .

[30]  W. Yuan,et al.  Impact of Spatial Variability Parameters on Seismic Fragilities of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Subjected to Differential Support Motions , 2017 .

[31]  A. M. Abdel-Ghaffar,et al.  Modeling the nonlinear seismic behavior of cable-stayed bridges with passive control bearings , 1995 .

[32]  Jong-Su Jeon,et al.  Optimal Intensity Measures in Probabilistic Seismic Demand Models of Cable-Stayed Bridges Subjected to Pulse-Like Ground Motions , 2019, Journal of Bridge Engineering.

[33]  Shirley J. Dyke,et al.  Seismic Fragility Relationships of a Cable-Stayed Bridge Equipped with Response Modification Systems , 2014 .

[34]  Reginald DesRoches,et al.  Selection of optimal intensity measures in probabilistic seismic demand models of highway bridge portfolios , 2008 .

[35]  Stephen A. Mahin,et al.  Achieving reliable seismic performance enhancement using multi‐stage friction pendulum isolators , 2010 .

[36]  R. S. Jangid Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions , 2005 .