Modeling and Design of Small, Passive, and Standard-compliant Proximity Coupling Transponders

Proximity coupling (13.56 MHz) RFID transponders of today utilize small form factor antennas and are passive in terms of power supply. They are predominantly used in smart wearables (e.g., watches, bracelets, rings). Such transponder sizes demand careful design regarding energy transfer and longest achievable operating distance, so that compliance to standards (e.g., EMVCo) can be maintained.This work compares three design approaches for these transponders: IC-only tuning, optimized tuning, and power matching, along with their advantages, disadvantages, and reasoning behind the choice of right transponder components (antenna and IC). A simulation framework based on linear and nonlinear modeling is also presented. It offers more degrees of freedom in searching for the optimal design and predicts the most important figure of merit for these transponders: the minimum operating magnetic field strength (Hmin).Compared to measurements, our framework was able to predict Hmin with an accuracy of under 0.1 A/m. The three design approaches were applied on rectangular 20×25 mm transponders that were modeled within the framework and subsequently fabricated. Using power matching (Hmin=0.78 A/m, Q=27.64) resulted in a significant improvement over IC-only tuning (Hmin=1.71 A/m, Q=3.98) and optimized tuning (Hmin=1.31 A/m, Q=5.02). An even smaller (20×20 mm) transponder with power matching was still able to fulfill EMVCo compliance and achieve a reading distance of 7 cm with a typical payment reader.

[1]  Jasmin Grosinger,et al.  An on-chip capacitive coupled RFID tag , 2014, The 8th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP 2014).

[2]  Michael Gebhart,et al.  Chip impedance characterization for contactless proximity personal cards , 2010, 2010 7th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks & Digital Signal Processing (CSNDSP 2010).

[3]  B. Geck,et al.  A novel method for determining the resonance frequency of PICCs , 2008, 2008 6th International Symposium on Communication Systems, Networks and Digital Signal Processing.

[4]  T. Larsen,et al.  The Resonance Frequency Measurement Method of PICCs and the Environmental Influence , 2007 .

[5]  Holger Arthaber,et al.  A precise resonance frequency measurement method based on ISO‐standardized setups for contactless chip cards , 2019, International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering.

[6]  Klaus Finkenzeller,et al.  Book Reviews: RFID Handbook: Fundamentals and Applications in Contactless Smart Cards and Identification, 2nd ed. , 2004, ACM Queue.

[7]  Jasmin Grosinger,et al.  Tag Size Matters: Miniaturized RFID Tags to Connect Smart Objects to the Internet , 2018, IEEE Microwave Magazine.

[8]  Jean-Baptiste Dore,et al.  ISO/IEC 14443 VHBR: influence of the proximity antennas on the PCD-to-PICC data link performance , 2015, 2015 International EURASIP Workshop on RFID Technology (EURFID).

[10]  Jasmin Grosinger,et al.  A miniaturized dual band RFID tag , 2014, 2014 IEEE RFID Technology and Applications Conference (RFID-TA).