Real-time OFDM or Nyquist pulse generation--which performs better with limited resources?

We investigate the performance and DSP resource requirements of digitally generated OFDM and sinc-shaped Nyquist pulses. The two multiplexing techniques are of interest as they offer highest spectral efficiency. The comparison aims at determining which technology performs better with limited processing capacities of state-of-the-art FPGAs. It is shown that a novel Nyquist pulse shaping technique, based on look-up tables requires lower resource count than equivalent IFFT-based OFDM signal generation while achieving similar performance with low inter-channel guard-bands in ultra-dense WDM. Our findings are based on a resource assessment of selected DSP implementations in terms of both simulations and experimental validations. The experiments were performed with real-time software-defined transmitters using a single or three optical carriers.

[1]  Y Tang,et al.  Coherent optical OFDM: theory and design. , 2008, Optics express.

[2]  S. Chandrasekhar,et al.  Real-Time 2.5 GS/s Coherent Optical Receiver for 53.3-Gb/s Sub-Banded OFDM , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[3]  Beril Inan,et al.  Realization of a real-time 93.8-Gb/s polarization-multiplexed OFDM transmitter with 1024-point IFFT , 2011, 2011 37th European Conference and Exhibition on Optical Communication.

[4]  R Schmogrow,et al.  Real-time Nyquist pulse generation beyond 100 Gbit/s and its relation to OFDM. , 2012, Optics express.

[5]  C. Koos,et al.  150 Gbit/s real-time Nyquist pulse transmission Over 150 km SSMF enhanced by DSP with dynamic precision , 2012, OFC/NFOEC.

[6]  R Schmogrow,et al.  Real-time OFDM transmitter beyond 100 Gbit/s. , 2011, Optics express.

[7]  Bernhard Spinnler,et al.  Equalizer Design and Complexity for Digital Coherent Receivers , 2010, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics.

[8]  M. Winter,et al.  Error Vector Magnitude as a Performance Measure for Advanced Modulation Formats , 2012, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[9]  Julien Schmaltz,et al.  Easy Formal Specification and Validation of Unbounded Networks-on-Chips Architectures , 2012, TODE.

[10]  P. Andrekson,et al.  Comparison of polarization-switched QPSK and polarization-multiplexed QPSK at 30 Gbit/s. , 2011, Optics express.

[11]  R Schmogrow,et al.  Real-Time Software-Defined Multiformat Transmitter Generating 64QAM at 28 GBd , 2010, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[12]  P. Poggiolini,et al.  On the Performance of Nyquist-WDM Terabit Superchannels Based on PM-BPSK, PM-QPSK, PM-8QAM or PM-16QAM Subcarriers , 2011, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[13]  Masataka Nakazawa,et al.  Real-time FPGA-based coherent optical receiver for 1 Gsymbol/s, 64 QAM transmission , 2011, 2011 Optical Fiber Communication Conference and Exposition and the National Fiber Optic Engineers Conference.

[14]  Jian Zhao,et al.  Approaching the Non-Linear Shannon Limit , 2010, Journal of Lightwave Technology.

[15]  William Shieh,et al.  Multiband Real-Time Coherent Optical OFDM Reception up to 110 Gb/s with 600-km Transmission , 2010, IEEE Photonics Journal.

[16]  Rene Schmogrow,et al.  Generation and transmission of 85.4 Gb/s real-time 16QAM coherent optical OFDM signals over 400 km SSMF with preamble-less reception. , 2012, Optics express.

[17]  Polina Bayvel,et al.  10.7 Gb/s electronic predistortion transmitter using commercial FPGAs and D/A converters implementing real-time DSP for chromatic dispersion and SPM compensation. , 2009, Optics express.

[18]  Franz Franchetti,et al.  Computer Generation of Hardware for Linear Digital Signal Processing Transforms , 2012, TODE.