Reasonable initial price interval calculation of carbon market

: Currently there is a disconnection between carbon price and market supply-and-demand in China ’ s carbon pilot market and the carbon pricing system has failed to meet the development needs of carbon markets. To address this problem, this study used the stochastic analysis method to measure carbon cost from the perspective of firms, and developed a determinant equation that affects corporate carbon costs based on the decoupling theory. Using this equation, we simulated the linkages between firm- government- market and initial carbon price, thereby obtaining the fluctuation interval of such price that conforms to the pattern of China ’ s carbon market development. Through empirical tests, we obtained the following results. (1) Government ’ s penalty cost and the probability of quota shortage both are key factors that restrict emission control firms to obtain carbon trading income, and a premise to ensure the sound development of carbon market is to balance the relation among firms, the government, and the market. (2) The setting of initial carbon price is directly related to the emission reduction efficiency that is expected by the government in the carbon market, and in the current economic environment, the reasonable setting range of initial carbon price in the national unified market is [41, 52] Yuan/t. (3) Penalty cost explains 97% of the setting of initial carbon price, and penalty mechanism is the best tool that can lead to the sound development of carbon markets at the government level currently. (4) Both market efficiency and emission reduction goal are main indicators that affect carbon price setting in the long run, and one important premise for the sound development of carbon market is to set up a two- way initial price system of “ market- government. ” This article provides theoretical underpinnings as well as empirical support for enriching China ’ s carbon market price theory and setting the initial carbon price scientifically.

[1]  Tiansen Liu,et al.  A Fuzzy Stochastic Model for Carbon Price Prediction Under the Effect of Demand-related Policy in China's Carbon Market , 2019, Ecological Economics.

[2]  M. McAleer,et al.  Establishing National Carbon Emission Prices for China , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[3]  Zhao Yongbin,et al.  An innovative allowance allocation method in China ’ s unified national emissions trading scheme , 2019 .

[4]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Quantities versus prices for best social welfare in carbon reduction: A literature review , 2019, Applied Energy.

[5]  Kate Ervine How Low Can It Go? Analysing the Political Economy of Carbon Market Design and Low Carbon Prices , 2018 .

[6]  Linghong Zhang,et al.  The Optimal Carbon Emission Reduction and Prices with Cap and Trade Mechanism and Competition , 2018, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[7]  J. Bi,et al.  Pricing the permission of pollution:Optimal control-based simulation of payments for the initial emission allowance in China , 2018 .

[8]  Yi-Ming Wei,et al.  Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emissions in the thermal power sector: A regional empirical analysis from China , 2018 .

[9]  Lei Wu,et al.  Research on the efficiency of carbon trading market in China , 2017 .

[10]  Dapeng Liang,et al.  Region division of China's carbon market based on the provincial/municipal carbon intensity , 2017 .

[11]  Xueping Tan,et al.  The market performance of carbon trading in China: A theoretical framework of structure-conduct-performance , 2017 .

[12]  D. Ma,et al.  How to Set the Allowance Benchmarking for Cement Industry in China’s Carbon Market: Marginal Analysis and the Case of the Hubei Emission Trading Pilot , 2017 .

[13]  Zhipeng Tang,et al.  The impacts of emissions accounting methods on an imperfect competitive carbon trading market , 2017 .

[14]  Xinming Du,et al.  Measuring spatial spillover effects of industrial emissions: A method and case study in Anhui province, China , 2017 .

[15]  Charles A. Holt,et al.  Reprint of: Price and quantity collars for stabilizing emission allowance prices: Laboratory experiments on the EU ETS market stability reserve , 2016 .

[16]  Pi-qin Gong,et al.  Study on the investment value and investment opportunity of renewable energies under the carbon trading system , 2016 .

[17]  Yong Geng,et al.  Evaluating CO2 emission performance in China’s cement industry: An enterprise perspective , 2016 .

[18]  Lei Zhu,et al.  How will the emissions trading scheme save cost for achieving China’s 2020 carbon intensity reduction target? , 2014 .

[19]  S. Salant,et al.  Cap-and-trade programs under delayed compliance: Consequences of interim injections of permits , 2014 .

[20]  Ottmar Edenhofer,et al.  Causes of the EU ETS price drop: Recession, CDM, renewable policies or a bit of everything? - New evidence , 2014 .

[21]  Yiqi Luo,et al.  Faster Decomposition Under Increased Atmospheric CO2 Limits Soil Carbon Storage , 2014, Science.

[22]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  Adaptation and Mitigation in Long-term Climate Policy , 2013 .

[23]  Thierry Bréchet,et al.  Adaptation and Mitigation in Long-term Climate Policy , 2010, Environmental and Resource Economics.

[24]  Regina Betz,et al.  The implications of Australia’s carbon pollution reduction scheme for its National Electricity Market , 2010 .

[25]  Michel Verschuere,et al.  PRICING AND HEDGING IN CARBON EMISSIONS MARKETS , 2009 .