Kernel PCA Performance in Processes with Multiple Operation Modes

Kernel PCA, as a multivariate statistical process monitoring (MSPM) tool, is a powerful technique capable of coping with non linear relations between variables, thus outperforming classical linear techniques when non linearities are present in data. In real industrial chemical processes, multiple plant operating modes often lead to multiple nominal operation regions, and MSPM techniques that do not take account of this fact show increased false alarm and missing alarm rates. The existence of multiple operation modes is often more frequent than clearly expressed strong non linear relations between the variables involved. Non linear relations do exist, but the small variability allowed in key variables during normal plant operation prevents these non linear relations from being expressed in the data. In this work, a fault detection tool based on Kernel PCA is tested in such multiple operation modes environments, with final objective of implementing the tool in a real industrial installation. Robustness of the tool for coping with a certain percentage of outliers is particularly examined. The tool is applied to three case studies: (i) a two dimensional toy example, (ii) a realistic simulation usually used as a bench-mark example, known as the Tennessee Eastman Process, (iii) real data from a methanol plant. Hence, the feasibility of implementing fault detection tools based on this technique in the field of chemical industrial processes is discussed.

[1]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Performance monitoring of a multi-product semi-batch process , 2001 .

[2]  Junghui Chen,et al.  Mixture Principal Component Analysis Models for Process Monitoring , 1999 .

[3]  In-Beum Lee,et al.  Nonlinear modeling and adaptive monitoring with fuzzy and multivariate statistical methods in biological wastewater treatment plants. , 2003, Journal of biotechnology.

[4]  S. Zhao,et al.  Monitoring of Processes with Multiple Operating Modes through Multiple Principle Component Analysis Models , 2004 .

[5]  Richard D. Braatz,et al.  Fault detection in industrial processes using canonical variate analysis and dynamic principal component analysis , 2000 .

[6]  Chonghun Han,et al.  Real-time monitoring for a process with multiple operating modes , 1998 .

[7]  Stelios Psarakis,et al.  Multivariate statistical process control charts: an overview , 2007, Qual. Reliab. Eng. Int..

[8]  Jin Hyun Park,et al.  Fault detection and identification of nonlinear processes based on kernel PCA , 2005 .

[9]  In-Beum Lee,et al.  Nonlinear dynamic process monitoring based on dynamic kernel PCA , 2004 .

[10]  Raghunathan Rengaswamy,et al.  A review of process fault detection and diagnosis: Part III: Process history based methods , 2003, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[11]  C. Yoo,et al.  Overall statistical monitoring of static and dynamic patterns , 2003 .

[12]  N. Lawrence Ricker,et al.  Decentralized control of the Tennessee Eastman Challenge Process , 1996 .

[13]  Christos Georgakis,et al.  Plant-wide control of the Tennessee Eastman problem , 1995 .

[14]  C. Yoo,et al.  Nonlinear process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis , 2004 .

[15]  W. Ho,et al.  Dynamic principal component analysis based methodology for clustering process states in agile chemical plants , 2004 .

[16]  Heiko Hoffmann,et al.  Kernel PCA for novelty detection , 2007, Pattern Recognit..

[17]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Nonlinear Component Analysis as a Kernel Eigenvalue Problem , 1998, Neural Computation.

[18]  Zhi-huan Song,et al.  Online monitoring of nonlinear multiple mode processes based on adaptive local model approach , 2008 .

[19]  E. F. Vogel,et al.  A plant-wide industrial process control problem , 1993 .

[20]  In-Beum Lee,et al.  Fault identification for process monitoring using kernel principal component analysis , 2005 .