Spectral BRDF modeling using wavelets

The Bi-directional Reflectance Distribution Function (BRDF) is a complex function characterizing the reflection of light on a surface. It depends on five variables: four angles (lighting direction and observer direction) and the wavelength. A complete measurement campaign generates a large data set difficult to model. One way to proceed is to fit an analytical model on this data set. A numerical optimization technique, like simplex, allows to retrieve the best parameters of the model by minimizing the error with regard to measurements. Most of the analytical models obtain poor results for specular surfaces, and no wavelength dependent model actually exists. These reasons lead us to choose a numerical approach and particularly wavelets. This paper shows how wavelets can be used to provide an efficient BRDF model. Results of modeling are presented over a large collection of measurement data sets. At fixed wavelength, wavelet model has pretty good results, comparable to the best analytical models for diffuse surfaces, and much better for specular surfaces. The global relative error is lower than 5% with a compression ratio better than 90%. For spectral data sets, the wavelet model also presents very interesting performances with compression ratios greater than 95% and error lower than 2%.

[1]  William C. Snyder,et al.  BRDF models to predict spectral reflectance and emissivity in the thermal infrared , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[2]  W. Dahmen,et al.  Multiresolution analysis and wavelets on S2 and S3 , 1995 .

[3]  Georges-Pierre Bonneau Optimal triangular Haar bases for spherical data , 1999, Proceedings Visualization '99 (Cat. No.99CB37067).

[4]  Robert R. Lewis,et al.  Making Shaders More Physically Plausible , 1994, Comput. Graph. Forum.

[5]  H. Rahman,et al.  Coupled surface-atmosphere reflectance (CSAR) model: 2. Semiempirical surface model usable with NOAA advanced very high resolution radiometer data , 1993 .

[6]  Wim Sweldens,et al.  The lifting scheme: a construction of second generation wavelets , 1998 .

[7]  Peter Schröder,et al.  Spherical wavelets: efficiently representing functions on the sphere , 1995, SIGGRAPH.

[8]  K. Torrance,et al.  Theory for off-specular reflection from roughened surfaces , 1967 .

[9]  Peter Shirley,et al.  Physically based lighting calculations for computer graphics , 1991 .

[10]  Xavier Briottet,et al.  Comparison of measured and modeled BRDF of natural targets , 1999, Defense, Security, and Sensing.

[11]  Robert L. Cook,et al.  A Reflectance Model for Computer Graphics , 1987, TOGS.

[12]  F. A. Seiler,et al.  Numerical Recipes in C: The Art of Scientific Computing , 1989 .

[13]  M. Leroy,et al.  Intercomparison of several BRDF models for the compositing of spaceborne POLDER data over land surfaces , 1996, IGARSS '96. 1996 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium.

[14]  Xavier Briottet,et al.  Presentation of a new BRDF measurement device , 1998, Remote Sensing.

[15]  F. E. Nicodemus,et al.  Geometrical considerations and nomenclature for reflectance , 1977 .

[16]  Andrea J. van Doorn,et al.  Bidirectional Reflection Distribution Function Expressed in Terms of Surface Scattering Modes , 1996, ECCV.

[17]  Bui Tuong Phong Illumination for computer generated pictures , 1975, Commun. ACM.