Measurement of the point spread function in MRI using constant time imaging

The point spread function is a fundamental property of magnetic resonance imaging methods that affects image quality and spatial resolution. The point spread function is difficult to measure precisely in magnetic resonance even with the use of carefully designed phantoms, and it is difficult to calculate this function for complex sequences such as echo‐planar imaging. This report describes a method that measures the point spread function with high spatial resolution at each pixel in samples of uniform intensity distribution. This method uses additional phase encoding gradients before the echo‐planar acquisition that are constant in length but vary in amplitude. The additional gradients are applied to image the contents within each individual voxel. This method has been used to measure the point spread function for echo‐planar imaging to demonstrate the effects of limited k‐space sampling and transverse relaxation, as well as the effects of object motion. By considering the displacement of the point spread function, local distortions due to susceptibility and chemical shift effects have been quantified and corrected. The method allows rapid assessment of the point spread function in echo‐planar imaging, in vivo, and may also be applied to other rapid imaging sequences that can be modified to include these additional phase encoding gradients.

[1]  K. Rossmann Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Tools for the study of imaging systems. , 1969, Radiology.

[2]  P. Judy,et al.  The line spread function and modulation transfer function of a computed tomographic scanner. , 1976, Medical physics.

[3]  P. Röschmann,et al.  Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. , 1985, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[4]  C. Ahn,et al.  High-Speed Spiral-Scan Echo Planar NMR Imaging-I , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  J. S. Orr,et al.  Investigation of slice characteristics in nuclear magnetic resonance imaging , 1986 .

[6]  D. Firmin,et al.  Echo‐planar high‐resolution flow velocity mapping , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  S. Riederer,et al.  Analysis of T2 limitations and off‐resonance effects on spatial resolution and artifacts in echo‐planar imaging , 1990, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[8]  O. Simonetti,et al.  Theoretical aspects of motion sensitivity and compensation in echo‐planar imaging , 1991, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  J. R. Prince,et al.  Transfer function measurement and analysis for a magnetic resonance imager. , 1991, Medical physics.

[10]  Kim Butts,et al.  Analysis of flow effects in echo‐planar imaging , 1992, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[11]  J C Gore,et al.  The Loss of Small Objects in Variable TE Imaging: Implications for FSE, RARE, and EPI , 1992, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[12]  R A Lerski,et al.  Trial of modifications to Eurospin MRI test objects. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  D J Drost,et al.  A cosine modulation artifact in modulation transfer function computations caused by the misregistration of line spread profiles. , 1993, Medical physics.

[14]  J. D. de Certaines,et al.  Performance assessment and quality control in MRI by Eurospin test objects and protocols. , 1993, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[15]  D J Drost,et al.  Computing the modulation transfer function of a magnetic resonance imager. , 1994, Medical physics.

[16]  D. Cory,et al.  Sensitivity and Resolution of Constant-Time Imaging , 1994 .

[17]  P. Jezzard,et al.  Correction for geometric distortion in echo planar images from B0 field variations , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.