Evaluating Sediment Stability at Sites with Historic Contamination

The stability of cohesive sediment deposits during a rare storm is a critical component in the evaluation of remedial options at a contaminated sediment site. Estimating scour depths during a rare storm, and the resulting contaminant concentrations in the surficial layer of the bed, is necessary for comparing the efficacy of various remedial alternatives. Evaluation of sediment stability is accomplished using sediment transport analyses that employ quantitative procedures. Qualitative analyses or conceptual models can be useful for developing and validating quantitative analysis tools; however, qualitative techniques alone generally are insufficient for conducting defensible remedial alternative evaluations. The level of analysis used for a specific site depends on data availability, required level of accuracy, and time and budget constraints. A tier 1 analysis involves the use of approximate equations to produce order-of-magnitude estimates of scour depths during a rare storm. The second tier of this analysis scheme employs the development and application of a sediment transport model to evaluate bed stability. State-of-the-science sediment transport models have been effectively used as management tools for evaluating remedial options at several contaminated sediment sites. It should not be presumed that rare storm events cause catastrophic impacts at the site under review. Two case studies demonstrate that a rare storm is not necessarily catastrophic; significant increases in surficial bed concentrations caused by reexposure of elevated concentrations buried at depth in the bed will not necessarily occur during a rare storm. However, it is important to note that sediment stability is site-specific.

[1]  D. Ager The nature of the stratigraphical record , 1973 .

[2]  R. Ariathurai,et al.  Finite Element Model for Cohesive Sediment Transport , 1976 .

[3]  Ivar G. Jonsson,et al.  Bed friction and dissipation in a combined current and wave motion , 1985 .

[4]  T. M. Parchure,et al.  Erosion of soft cohesive sediment deposits , 1985 .

[5]  W. Lick,et al.  A Portable Device for Measuring Sediment Resuspension , 1986 .

[6]  Cheng-Han Tsai,et al.  Resuspension of Sediments from Long Island Sound (U.S.A.) , 1988 .

[7]  W. Lick,et al.  Variability of entrainment of cohesive sediments in freshwater , 1990 .

[8]  N. Hawley Preliminary Observations of Sediment Erosion from a Bottom Resting Flume , 1991 .

[9]  W. Lick,et al.  Transport of Suspended Solids in the Lower Fox River , 1991 .

[10]  E. A. Delo,et al.  Measurement and Prediction of Surface Shear Stress in Annular Flume , 1992 .

[11]  L. Rijn Principles of sediment transport in rivers, estuaries and coastal seas , 1993 .

[12]  C. K. Ziegler,et al.  Fine‐Grained Sediment Transport in Pawtuxet River, Rhode Island , 1994 .

[13]  W. Lick,et al.  The Resuspension and Transport of Fine-Grained Sediments in Lake Erie , 1994 .

[14]  W. Lick,et al.  Resuspension Properties of Sediments from the Fox, Saginaw, and Buffalo Rivers , 1995 .

[15]  C. K. Ziegler,et al.  Long-Term Simulation of Fine-Grained Sediment Transport in Large Reservoir , 1995 .

[16]  Wilbert Lick,et al.  Sediment transport in the lower Saginaw River , 1995 .

[17]  W. Lick,et al.  Development and Calibration of a Fine-Grained Sediment Transport Model for the Buffalo River , 1996 .

[18]  Jesse D. Roberts,et al.  Effects of bulk density on sediment erosion rates , 1997 .