THE EFFECT OF PROVOCATION IN THE FORM OF MILD EROTICA ON ATTITUDE TO THE AD AND CORPORATE IMAGE : Differences Between Cause-Related and Product-Based Advertising

Provocative advertising is characterized by a deliberate attempt to gain attention through shock. This research investigates the reactions of individuals to a provocative appeal for a cause as opposed to a provocative advertisement for a standard consumer product, using mild erotica as the element of provocative imagery. An experiment using 391 adult subjects was conducted, and two analyses were performed. The first examined the effect of stimulus type (mildly erotic/nonerotic) by product category (cause appeal/consumer product) on attitude to the ad. The second examined the effect of stimulus type (mildly erotic/nonerotic) by cause (AIDS [acquired immunodeficiency syndrome]/SIDS [sudden infant death syndrome]) on corporate image. Both analyses also included gender as a third independent variable. The results suggest that people prefer mildly erotic ads generally, that an organization using mild erotica in appeals for a cause will be viewed more favorably where the erotica is congruent with the cause, and that women may be more responsive to mild erotica in cause appeals than are men.

[1]  Silvia Biasotti,et al.  What’s in an image? , 2005, The Visual Computer.

[2]  John E. Hunter,et al.  The Desperate Need for Replications , 2001 .

[3]  David M. Szymanski.  Modality and offering effects in sales presentations for a good versus a service , 2001 .

[4]  L. Chernatony,et al.  Corporate branding and corporate brand performance , 2001 .

[5]  Lars Thøger Christensen,et al.  Corporate identity and corporate image revisited ‐ A semiotic perspective , 2001 .

[6]  Tom Reichert,et al.  The Effects of Sexual Social Marketing Appeals on Cognitive Processing and Persuasion , 2001 .

[7]  Stewart Lewis,et al.  Measuring corporate reputation , 2001 .

[8]  Michelle Renee Nelson,et al.  Explaining Gendered Responses to “Help-Self” and “Help-Others” Charity Ad Appeals: The Mediating Role of World-Views , 2000 .

[9]  James Poon Teng Fatt,et al.  Enhancing corporate image in organisations , 2000 .

[10]  Paul W. Miniard,et al.  The Influence of Positive Mood on Brand Extension Evaluations , 2000 .

[11]  Sid C. Dudley.  Consumer Attitudes Toward Nudity in Advertising , 1999 .

[12]  Stephen J. Arnold,et al.  The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment , 1999 .

[13]  S. Jackson,et al.  Changing Conceptions of "Message Effects" A 24-Year Overview , 1999 .

[14]  Nigel K. L. Pope,et al.  Sponsorship and image: a replication and extension , 1999 .

[15]  P. Bone,et al.  Does it Matter If it Smells? Olfactory Stimuli as Advertising Executional Cues , 1998 .

[16]  N E Stroeker,et al.  Measuring Corporate Images , 1998 .

[17]  Andrea J. S. Stanaland,et al.  Beefcake and Cheesecake: Insights for Advertisers , 1998 .

[18]  G. Menon,et al.  AIDS and Me, Never the Twain Shall Meet: The Effects of Information Accessibility on Judgments of Risk and Advertising Effectiveness , 1998 .

[19]  C. Gilligan.  In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development , 2009 .

[20]  R. Vezina,et al.  Provocation in advertising: A conceptualization and an empirical assessment , 1997 .

[21]  Patrick De Pelsmacker,et al.  The Communication Effects of Provocation in Print Advertising , 1996 .

[22]  F. Piron,et al.  Consumer Advertising in Germany and the United States , 1996 .

[23]  Neeli Bendapudi,et al.  Enhancing Helping Behavior: An Integrative Framework for Promotion Planning , 1996 .

[24]  Steven G. Horton,et al.  Male nudity in advertisements: A modified replication and extension of gender and product effects , 1996 .

[25]  Marla Royne Stafford,et al.  Retail Services Advertising: The Effects of Appeal, Medium, and Service , 1995 .

[26]  Robert E. Smith,et al.  Gender differences in information processing strategies: An empirical test of the selectivity , 1995 .

[27]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Understanding Responses to Sex Appeals in Advertising: an Individual Difference Approach , 1995 .

[28]  Men's Enjoyment of Explicit Erotica: Effects of Person-Specific Attitudes and Gender-Specific Norms , 1995 .

[29]  Rajshekhar G. Javalgi,et al.  Awareness of Sponsorship and Corporate Image: An Empirical Investigation , 1994 .

[30]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Public Service Advertisements: Emotions and Empathy Guide Prosocial Behavior , 1994 .

[31]  Michael S. LaTour,et al.  Fear Appeals in Print Advertising: An Analysis of Arousal and Ad Response , 1993 .

[32]  Mary A. Gowan,et al.  Corporate Image, Recruitment Image And Initial Job Choice Decisions , 1993 .

[33]  Paul Herbig,et al.  The relationship of reputation and credibility to brand success , 1993 .

[34]  T. Henthorne,et al.  Female nudity: attitudes towards the ad and the brand, and implications for advertising strategy , 1993 .

[35]  John B. Ford,et al.  Differing reactions to female role portrayals in advertising , 1993 .

[36]  Edward F. McQuarrie,et al.  On Resonance: A Critical Pluralistic Inquiry into Advertising Rhetoric , 1992 .

[37]  Gabriel J. Biehal,et al.  Attitude toward the Ad and Brand Choice , 1992 .

[38]  Daniel Kahneman,et al.  Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction , 1992 .

[39]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Exploring Differences in Males' and Females' Processing Strategies , 1991 .

[40]  H. Rao Unnava,et al.  An Imagery-Processing View of the Role of Pictures in Print Advertisements , 1991 .

[41]  Joan Meyers-Levy,et al.  Gender Differences in the Use of Message Cues and Judgments , 1991 .

[42]  Dana-Nicoleta Lascu,et al.  Consumer Guilt: Examining the Potential of a New Marketing Construct , 1991 .

[43]  Michael S. LaTour,et al.  Female Nudity, Arousal, and Ad Response: An Experimental Investigation , 1990 .

[44]  C. Fombrun,et al.  What's in a Name? Reputation Building and Corporate Strategy , 1990 .

[45]  J. Andreoni.  IMPURE ALTRUISM AND DONATIONS TO PUBLIC GOODS: A THEORY OF WARM-GLOW GIVING* , 1990 .

[46]  Michael S. Latour.  Female nudity in print advertising: An analysis of gender differences in arousal and Ad response , 1990 .

[47]  Michael A. Belch,et al.  The Effects of Sexual and Non-Sexual Advertising Appeals and Information Level on Cognitive Processing and Communication Effectiveness , 1990 .

[48]  P. Homer.  The Mediating Role of Attitude toward the Ad: Some Additional Evidence , 1990 .

[49]  F. Kardes,et al.  The Effects of Physiological Arousal on Information Processing and Persuasion , 1988 .

[50]  Colin Camerer,et al.  Reputation and corporate strategy: A review of recent theory and applications , 1988 .

[51]  Grahame R. Dowling,et al.  Measuring corporate images: A review of alternative approaches , 1988 .

[52]  John O. Summers,et al.  Checking the Success of Manipulations in Marketing Experiments , 1986 .

[53]  Lawrence C. Soley,et al.  Sex in Advertising: A Comparison of 1964 and 1984 Magazine Advertisements , 1986 .

[54]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  The Role of Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A Test of Competing Explanations: , 1986 .

[55]  Meryl P. Gardner,et al.  Does Attitude toward the Ad Affect Brand Attitude under a Brand Evaluation Set? , 1985 .

[56]  D. Aaker,et al.  Causes of Irritation in Advertising , 1985 .

[57]  Terry L. Childers,et al.  Conditions for a Picture-Superiority Effect on Consumer Memory , 1984 .

[58]  Daniel C. Bello,et al.  THE COMMUNICATION EFFECTS OF CONTROVERSIAL SEXUAL CONTENT IN TELEVISION PROGRAMS AND COMMERCIALS , 1983 .

[59]  G. Belch,et al.  Psychophysiological and Cognitive Responses to Sex in Advertising , 1982 .

[60]  C. W. Park,et al.  Familiarity and Its Impact on Consumer Decision Biases and Heuristics , 1981 .

[61]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude? , 1981 .

[62]  Morry Ghingold.  Guilt Arousing Marketing Communications: an Unexplored Variable , 1981 .

[63]  R. Kerin,et al.  Women in Advertisements: Retrospect and Prospect , 1979 .

[64]  Michael Belch,et al.  Demographic and Cognitive Factors Influencing Viewers Evaluations of QSexyQ Advertisements , 1979 .

[65]  A. Eagly.  Sex differences in influenceability. , 1978 .

[66]  R. Chestnut,et al.  The “Decorative” Female Model: Sexual Stimuli and the Recognition of Advertisements , 1977 .

[67]  Gilbert A. Churchill,et al.  The Impact of Physically Attractive Models on Advertising Evaluations , 1977 .

[68]  R. Kerin,et al.  The Female Role in Advertisements: Some Experimental Evidence , 1977 .

[69]  Donald Sciglimpaglia,et al.  Sex Role Portrayals in Advertising , 1977 .

[70]  P. S. Raju.  Product Familiarity, Brand Name, and Price Influences on Product Evaluation , 1977 .

[71]  Peter Wright,et al.  Factors Affecting Cognitive Resistance to Advertising , 1975 .

[72]  G. Haines,et al.  The Theory of Buyer Behavior. , 1970 .

[73]  Major Steadman,et al.  How sexy illustrations affect brand recall. , 1969 .

[74]  D. B. Lucas,et al.  Appeals in advertising. , 1930 .