The players may change but the game remains: network analyses of ruminal microbiomes suggest taxonomic differences mask functional similarity

By mapping translated metagenomic reads to a microbial metabolic network, we show that ruminal ecosystems that are rather dissimilar in their taxonomy can be considerably more similar at the metabolic network level. Using a new network bi-partition approach for linking the microbial network to a bovine metabolic network, we observe that these ruminal metabolic networks exhibit properties consistent with distinct metabolic communities producing similar outputs from common inputs. For instance, the closer in network space that a microbial reaction is to a reaction found in the host, the lower will be the variability of its enzyme copy number across hosts. Similarly, these microbial enzymes that are nearby to host nodes are also higher in copy number than are more distant enzymes. Collectively, these results demonstrate a widely expected pattern that, to our knowledge, has not been explicitly demonstrated in microbial communities: namely that there can exist different community metabolic networks that have the same metabolic inputs and outputs but differ in their internal structure.

[1]  E. N. Bergman Energy contributions of volatile fatty acids from the gastrointestinal tract in various species. , 1990, Physiological reviews.

[2]  Knut Reinert,et al.  SeqAn An efficient, generic C++ library for sequence analysis , 2008, BMC Bioinformatics.

[3]  S. B. Needleman,et al.  A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. , 1970, Journal of molecular biology.

[4]  Katherine H. Huang,et al.  Structure, Function and Diversity of the Healthy Human Microbiome , 2012, Nature.

[5]  S. Tringe,et al.  Metagenomic Discovery of Biomass-Degrading Genes and Genomes from Cow Rumen , 2011, Science.

[6]  R. Knight,et al.  Worlds within worlds: evolution of the vertebrate gut microbiota , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[7]  James R. Cole,et al.  The Ribosomal Database Project: improved alignments and new tools for rRNA analysis , 2008, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Stephen P Hubbell,et al.  Neutral theory and the evolution of ecological equivalence. , 2006, Ecology.

[9]  Cole Trapnell,et al.  Ultrafast and memory-efficient alignment of short DNA sequences to the human genome , 2009, Genome Biology.

[10]  D H Crews,et al.  Test duration for growth, feed intake, and feed efficiency in beef cattle using the GrowSafe System. , 2006, Journal of animal science.

[11]  Qiang Feng,et al.  A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes , 2012, Nature.

[12]  K. Nelson,et al.  Gene-centric metagenomics of the fiber-adherent bovine rumen microbiome reveals forage specific glycoside hydrolases , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[13]  O. White,et al.  Environmental Genome Shotgun Sequencing of the Sargasso Sea , 2004, Science.

[14]  A. McLysaght,et al.  Patterns of indirect protein interactions suggest a spatial organization to metabolism. , 2011, Molecular bioSystems.

[15]  Zhongtang Yu,et al.  Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. , 2011, FEMS microbiology ecology.

[16]  Sarath Chandra Janga,et al.  Network-based approaches for linking metabolism with environment , 2008, Genome Biology.

[17]  P. Bork,et al.  A human gut microbial gene catalogue established by metagenomic sequencing , 2010, Nature.

[18]  David L. Wheeler,et al.  GenBank , 2015, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  Jérôme Chave,et al.  Neutral theory and community ecology , 2004 .

[20]  Monica L. Mo,et al.  Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  C. Stevens,et al.  Contributions of microbes in vertebrate gastrointestinal tract to production and conservation of nutrients. , 1998, Physiological reviews.

[22]  F. Bäckhed,et al.  Obesity alters gut microbial ecology. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Kyongbum Lee,et al.  An algorithm for modularity analysis of directed and weighted biological networks based on edge-betweenness centrality , 2006, Bioinform..

[24]  Sharon I. Greenblum,et al.  Metagenomic systems biology of the human gut microbiome reveals topological shifts associated with obesity and inflammatory bowel disease , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  B. Hayes,et al.  High throughput whole rumen metagenome profiling using untargeted massively parallel sequencing , 2012, BMC Genetics.

[26]  Laurent Gil,et al.  Ensembl 2013 , 2012, Nucleic Acids Res..

[27]  Brian C. Thomas,et al.  EMIRGE: reconstruction of full-length ribosomal genes from microbial community short read sequencing data , 2011, Genome Biology.

[28]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Getting connected: analysis and principles of biological networks. , 2007, Genes & development.

[29]  M. Pop,et al.  Metagenomic Analysis of the Human Distal Gut Microbiome , 2006, Science.

[30]  Elhanan Borenstein,et al.  Towards a predictive systems-level model of the human microbiome: progress, challenges, and opportunities. , 2013, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[31]  R. Mackie Mutualistic Fermentative Digestion in the Gastrointestinal Tract: Diversity and Evolution1 , 2002, Integrative and comparative biology.

[32]  M. Bradford,et al.  Testing the functional significance of microbial community composition. , 2009, Ecology.

[33]  J. Russell,et al.  Factors That Alter Rumen Microbial Ecology , 2001, Science.

[34]  J. Gordon,et al.  How host-microbial interactions shape the nutrient environment of the mammalian intestine. , 2002, Annual review of nutrition.

[35]  P. Green,et al.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. I. Accuracy assessment. , 1998, Genome research.

[36]  G. Conant,et al.  Diet Alters Both the Structure and Taxonomy of the Ovine Gut Microbial Ecosystem , 2013, DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes.

[37]  Bernard Henrissat,et al.  Metabolic Reconstruction for Metagenomic Data and Its Application to the Human Microbiome , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[38]  M S Waterman,et al.  Identification of common molecular subsequences. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[39]  Michela Becchi,et al.  Large-Scale Pairwise Alignments on GPU Clusters: Exploring the Implementation Space , 2014, J. Signal Process. Syst..

[40]  A. Wagner Robustness and Evolvability in Living Systems , 2005 .

[41]  Nicholas Chia,et al.  Quantification of the relative roles of niche and neutral processes in structuring gastrointestinal microbiomes , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[42]  Y. Kobayashi Inclusion of novel bacteria in rumen microbiology: Need for basic and applied science , 2006 .

[43]  G. Conant Neutral evolution on mammalian protein surfaces. , 2009, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[44]  Mihai Pop,et al.  Microbiome Metagenomic Analysis of the Human Distal Gut , 2009 .

[45]  P. Weimer,et al.  Host specificity of the ruminal bacterial community in the dairy cow following near-total exchange of ruminal contents. , 2010, Journal of dairy science.

[46]  E. Delong,et al.  Unsuspected diversity among marine aerobic anoxygenic phototrophs , 2002, Nature.

[47]  R. Ley,et al.  Ecological and Evolutionary Forces Shaping Microbial Diversity in the Human Intestine , 2006, Cell.

[48]  E. Mardis,et al.  An obesity-associated gut microbiome with increased capacity for energy harvest , 2006, Nature.

[49]  Markus J. Herrgård,et al.  Reconstruction and validation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae iND750, a fully compartmentalized genome-scale metabolic model. , 2004, Genome research.

[50]  Andreas Wagner,et al.  Evolutionary Plasticity and Innovations in Complex Metabolic Reaction Networks , 2009, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[51]  E. Purdom,et al.  Diversity of the Human Intestinal Microbial Flora , 2005, Science.

[52]  P Green,et al.  Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. , 1998, Genome research.

[53]  B. Roe,et al.  A core gut microbiome in obese and lean twins , 2008, Nature.

[54]  E. Borenstein,et al.  Metabolic modeling of species interaction in the human microbiome elucidates community-level assembly rules , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[55]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[56]  C. Huttenhower,et al.  Relating the metatranscriptome and metagenome of the human gut , 2014, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[57]  M. Bekaert,et al.  Copy number alterations among mammalian enzymes cluster in the metabolic network. , 2011, Molecular biology and evolution.

[58]  S. Moore,et al.  Linkage of microbial ecology to phenotype: correlation of rumen microbial ecology to cattle's feed efficiency. , 2008, FEMS microbiology letters.

[59]  S. Tringe,et al.  Comparative Metagenomics of Microbial Communities , 2004, Science.

[60]  Peter D. Karp,et al.  The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases , 2007, Nucleic Acids Res..

[61]  Phat L Tran,et al.  Metabolic Complementarity and Genomics of the Dual Bacterial Symbiosis of Sharpshooters , 2006, PLoS biology.

[62]  D. Stahl,et al.  Metabolic modeling of a mutualistic microbial community , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[63]  Ernest Szeto,et al.  Symbiosis insights through metagenomic analysis of a microbial consortium. , 2006, Nature Reviews Microbiology.

[64]  Corey M. Hudson,et al.  Expression level, cellular compartment and metabolic network position all influence the average selective constraint on mammalian enzymes , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[65]  P. Bork,et al.  Molecular eco-systems biology: towards an understanding of community function , 2008, Nature Reviews Microbiology.