Unwrapping cochlear implants by spiral CT

Multielectrode, intracochlear implants were designed for individuals with profound sensorineural hearing loss who derive little or no benefit from acoustic hearing aids. Determination of each electrode's position in a patient's inner ear may improve speech processor programming to maximize speech recognition. In this paper, an approach is described to use as input a volumetric spiral computed tomography (CT) image of the Nucleus electrode array (Cochlear Pty. Ltd, Lane Cove, NSW, Australia) to unwrap it, and to measure its implanted length given starting and end points. Representative curvilinear structures were digitally synthesized in image volumes of isotropic 0.1-mm voxels. The electrode array was spirally CT-scanned in vitro and in vivo, and reconstructed on an isotropic grid in 0.1-mm steps. Two algorithms were constructed to track and measure these curvilinear structures. The first algorithm is Karhunen-Loeve (K-L)-transform based, in which the K-L transform is locally applied at a current main aids position to determine the eigenvectors of the main axis voxels, the next main axis position is estimated from the current position along the principal eigendirection, adjusted to the mass center of the orthogonal cross section passing through the estimated position, and then scaled to have a prespecified step. The second algorithm is similar to the first one but avoids use of the K-L transform, in the second algorithm, the next position is directly estimated along the local direction and then processed with the same correction and scaling operations. With user-specified starting and end points as well. As a local direction at the starting point, a curvilinear structure can be automatically tracked using either of the algorithms. The first algorithm is more robust, while the second one is more efficient. In the numerical and in vitro studies, the lengths of the curvilinear structures were accurately measured. Given local directions determined in the tracking process, an electrode array image can be unwrapped into a linear array with the central electrode axis as the abscissa. The unwrapping approach allows longitudinally and cross-sectionally accurate measurement and better visualization of cochlear implant images. With preimplantation knowledge of length, width, and center electrode distance, the position of individual electrodes can be estimated after unwrapping.

[1]  G Wang,et al.  Longitudinal resolution in volumetric x-ray computerized tomography--analytical comparison between conventional and helical computerized tomography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[2]  Luboš Voldřich,et al.  Correlative study of sensory cell density and cochlear length in humans , 1987, Hearing Research.

[3]  M F Dorman,et al.  Longitudinal changes in word recognition by patients who use the Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1990, Ear and hearing.

[4]  G Wang,et al.  Theoretical FWTM values in helical CT. , 1994, Medical physics.

[5]  K F King,et al.  Computed tomography scanning with simultaneous patient translation. , 1990, Medical physics.

[6]  P. A. Gusby,et al.  The University of Melbourne--nucleus multi-electrode cochlear implant. , 1987, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[7]  M W Vannier,et al.  Spiral CT: decreased spatial resolution in vivo due to broadening of section-sensitivity profile. , 1992, Radiology.

[8]  W. Kalender,et al.  Determination of the position of nucleus cochlear implant electrodes in the inner ear. , 1994, The American journal of otology.

[9]  M. J. Osberger,et al.  Independent Evaluation of the Speech Perception Abilities of Children with the Nucleus 22‐Channel Cochlear Implant System , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[10]  W. F. House,et al.  Medical and surgical issues , 1991 .

[11]  D. Kessler,et al.  Preliminary results with the clarion cochlear implant , 1992, The Laryngoscope.

[12]  H J McDermott,et al.  Comparison of current speech coding strategies. , 1993, Advances in oto-rhino-laryngology.

[13]  Mary Hardy,et al.  The length of the organ of Corti in man , 1938 .

[14]  W A Kalender,et al.  Physical performance characteristics of spiral CT scanning. , 1991, Medical physics.

[15]  W A Kalender,et al.  A Comparison of Conventional and Spiral CT: An Experimental Study on the Detection of Spherical Lesions , 1994, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[16]  D. D. Greenwood A cochlear frequency-position function for several species--29 years later. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  M. Skinner,et al.  Performance of postlinguistically deaf adults with the Wearable Speech Processor (WSP III) and Mini Speech Processor (MSP) of the Nucleus Multi-Electrode Cochlear Implant. , 1991, Ear and hearing.

[18]  G Wang,et al.  Spatial variation of section sensitivity profile in spiral computed tomography. , 1994, Medical physics.

[19]  B J Gantz,et al.  Performance over time with a nucleus or Ineraid cochlear implant. , 1992, Ear and hearing.

[20]  G M Clark,et al.  Radiologic evaluation of multichannel intracochlear implant insertion depth. , 1993, The American journal of otology.

[21]  W. Kalender,et al.  Spiral volumetric CT with single-breath-hold technique, continuous transport, and continuous scanner rotation. , 1990, Radiology.