Long-Term Postoperative Vocal Function after Thyroplasty Type I and Fat Injection Laryngoplasty

Objectives: We evaluated the differences in the long-term functional results of medialization thyroplasty type I (MT) and autologous fat injection laryngoplasty (FIL) in patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Methods: Forty-one patients underwent MT, and 73 patients underwent FIL. The voice functions before and after both surgeries were examined by aerodynamic, pitch and intensity, and acoustic analyses. The postoperative voice examinations were performed 12 months (median) after the MT, and 4 years (median) after the FIL. The differences between the preoperative and postoperative parameters were examined with a paired t-test for each group separately. For each variable, a comparison of the effects of surgery was conducted with an analysis of covariance model, with the change between the preoperative and postoperative values as the dependent variable and the preoperative value as the covariate. Results: In both groups, all parameters significantly improved after surgery. In particular, there was a significant difference for the postoperative acoustic analyses. However, the aerodynamic analysis after FIL improved more significantly in comparison to that after MT because of the respiratory handicap. Conclusions: We found that MT and FIL provided almost the same effectiveness, and that both surgeries were reliable in improving the vocal function in patients with vocal fold paralysis.

[1]  Jack J. Jiang,et al.  Multiparameter comparison of injection laryngoplasty, medialization laryngoplasty, and arytenoid adduction in an excised larynx model , 2010, The Laryngoscope.

[2]  L. Crevier-Buchman,et al.  Long-Term Acoustic Comparison of Thyroplasty versus Autologous Fat Injection , 2009, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[3]  Hyoungshin Park,et al.  Comparison of Effects of 2 Harvesting Methods on Fat Autograft , 2008, The Laryngoscope.

[4]  T. Nakashima,et al.  Efficacy of Additional Injection Laryngoplasty after Framework Surgery , 2008, Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology.

[5]  T. Nakashima,et al.  Comparative study of framework surgery and fat injection laryngoplasty , 2005, The Journal of Laryngology & Otology.

[6]  T. Nakashima,et al.  Analysis of voice function following autologous fat injection for vocal fold paralysis , 2005, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[7]  L. Crevier-Buchman,et al.  Intracordal Injection of Autologous Fat in Patients With Unilateral Laryngeal Nerve Paralysis: Long‐Term Results From the Patient's Perspective , 2003, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  T. McCulloch,et al.  Medialization Laryngoplasty with Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene , 1998, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[9]  D. Rice,et al.  Autologous Fat Injection for Vocal Fold Paralysis: Long-Term Histologic Evaluation , 1995, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[10]  R. Zraick,et al.  Injection versus medialization laryngoplasty for the treatment of unilateral vocal fold paralysis: follow‐up at six months , 2007, The Laryngoscope.