Technical Support by Smart Glasses During a Mass Casualty Incident: A Randomized Controlled Simulation Trial on Technically Assisted Triage and Telemedical App Use in Disaster Medicine

Background To treat many patients despite lacking personnel resources, triage is important in disaster medicine. Various triage algorithms help but often are used incorrectly or not at all. One potential problem-solving approach is to support triage with Smart Glasses. Objective In this study, augmented reality was used to display a triage algorithm and telemedicine assistance was enabled to compare the duration and quality of triage with a conventional one. Methods A specific Android app was designed for use with Smart Glasses, which added information in terms of augmented reality with two different methods—through the display of a triage algorithm in data glasses and a telemedical connection to a senior emergency physician realized by the integrated camera. A scenario was created (ie, randomized simulation study) in which 31 paramedics carried out a triage of 12 patients in 3 groups as follows: without technical support (control group), with a triage algorithm display, and with telemedical contact. Results A total of 362 assessments were performed. The accuracy in the control group was only 58%, but the assessments were quicker (on average 16.6 seconds). In contrast, an accuracy of 92% (P=.04) was achieved when using technical support by displaying the triage algorithm. This triaging took an average of 37.0 seconds. The triage group wearing data glasses and being telemedically connected achieved 90% accuracy (P=.01) in 35.0 seconds. Conclusions Triage with data glasses required markedly more time. While only a tally was recorded in the control group, Smart Glasses led to digital capture of the triage results, which have many tactical advantages. We expect a high potential in the application of Smart Glasses in disaster scenarios when using telemedicine and augmented reality features to improve the quality of triage.

[1]  Divya Jain,et al.  WHO safe surgery checklist: Barriers to universal acceptance , 2018, Journal of anaesthesiology, clinical pharmacology.

[2]  Edbert B Hsu,et al.  Mass-Casualty Triage: Time for an Evidence-Based Approach , 2008, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[3]  Rick Hong,et al.  Presence of undertriage and overtriage in simple triage and rapid treatment. , 2017, American journal of disaster medicine.

[4]  Mark X Cicero,et al.  Head-to-head comparison of disaster triage methods in pediatric, adult, and geriatric patients. , 2013, Annals of emergency medicine.

[5]  I. Bank,et al.  Invoking the "expectant" triage category: Can we make the paradigm shift? , 2017, American journal of disaster medicine.

[6]  Michael Czaplik,et al.  Treatment of Acute Coronary Syndrome by Telemedically Supported Paramedics Compared With Physician-Based Treatment: A Prospective, Interventional, Multicenter Trial , 2016, Journal of medical Internet research.

[7]  Rolf Rossaint,et al.  Feasibility of Prehospital Teleconsultation in Acute Stroke – A Pilot Study in Clinical Routine , 2012, PloS one.

[8]  Scott Levin,et al.  Accuracy and Reliability of Emergency Department Triage Using the Emergency Severity Index: An International Multicenter Assessment , 2018, Annals of emergency medicine.

[9]  J. Schiffner,et al.  Diagnostic precision of triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents. English version , 2019, Der Anaesthesist.

[10]  R Rossaint,et al.  Employment of Telemedicine in Emergency Medicine , 2014, Methods of Information in Medicine.

[11]  Michael Herczeg,et al.  Optical Head-Mounted Displays in Mass Casualty Incidents: Keeping an Eye on Patients and Hazardous Materials , 2015, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Crisis Response Manag..

[12]  J. Kotani,et al.  A review of the history of the origin of triage from a disaster medicine perspective , 2017, Acute medicine & surgery.

[13]  N. Ellebrecht,et al.  Vorsichtung durch Rettungsassistenten auf der Großübung SOGRO MANV 500 , 2011, Notfall + Rettungsmedizin.

[14]  Barbara M. Walsh,et al.  Do You See What I See? Insights from Using Google Glass for Disaster Telemedicine Triage , 2015, Prehospital and Disaster Medicine.

[15]  Davide Colombo,et al.  Disaster medicine through Google Glass. , 2015, European journal of emergency medicine : official journal of the European Society for Emergency Medicine.

[16]  R Rossaint,et al.  Analgesia by telemedically supported paramedics compared with physician‐administered analgesia: A prospective, interventional, multicentre trial , 2016, European journal of pain.

[17]  Hans Morten Lossius,et al.  Implementation of checklists in health care; learning from high-reliability organisations , 2011, Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine.

[18]  Michael Czaplik,et al.  Improved technical performance of a multifunctional prehospital telemedicine system between the research phase and the routine use phase – an observational study , 2017, Journal of telemedicine and telecare.

[19]  G. Perkins,et al.  In 'big bang' major incidents do triage tools accurately predict clinical priority?: a systematic review of the literature. , 2011, Injury.