Collaboration-Enabled Technology Commercialization in the High-Tech Firm: Knowledge Creation and the Systemic Perspective

The NPD management literature has discussed that technology commercialization (TC) performance is enhanced by three distinct yet highly complementary factors: cross-functional collaboration, knowledge creation), and system theory. A significant amount of existing literature has supported the importance of collaboration strategy on TC performance, but some empirical studies examining the relationship between collaboration strategy and TC performance present discordant results. The research objectives of this study are as follows. (1) To investigate how cross-functional collaboration affects technology commercialization performance through their effects on the design of knowledge creation. (2)To explore the mediating roles of knowledge creation on the relationships between cross-functional collaboration and technology commercialization performance. (3)To demonstrate the systems theory affects the relationship among cross-functional collaboration, knowledge creation and technology commercialization performance. This study used the remaining 203 valid (response rate of 47.88%) and complete questionnaires for the quantitative analysis, and the sample size was acceptable for AMOS analysis. This study contributes to NPD theory of TC in three main ways. First, the direct effect of cross-functional collaboration spreads new light on the importance assigned to the concept of collaborative orientation in TC process. Second, although we conducted a series of mediating test in this study but found no significant mediated effects of cross-functional collaboration on TC performance. Third, we ascertain that what organization problem matter in TC process by comprehensive methodology as systems theory.

[1]  X. Koufteros Testing a model of pull production: a paradigm for manufacturing research using structural equation modeling , 1999 .

[2]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Systems approaches to management , 2002 .

[3]  Tsuyoshi Numagami,et al.  Interfunctional transfers of engineers in Japan: empirical findings and implications for cross-functional integration , 1998 .

[4]  Yi-Chen Lin,et al.  Research on Business Strategy and Performance Evaluation in Collaborative Design , 2008, Int. J. Electron. Bus. Manag..

[5]  S. Balakrishnan,et al.  Information asymmetry, adverse selection and joint-ventures* Theory and evidence , 1993 .

[6]  E. Geisler,et al.  Information technologies and technology commercialization-the research agenda , 1997 .

[7]  Ludwig Bstieler,et al.  Trust Formation in Collaborative New Product Development , 2006 .

[8]  H. Blalock Causal Inferences in Nonexperimental Research , 1966 .

[9]  Durward K. Sobek,et al.  Another look at how Toyota integrates product development , 1998 .

[10]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[11]  D. A. Kenny,et al.  The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. , 1986, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[12]  Glenn B. Voss,et al.  The Influence of Multiple Store Environment Cues on Perceived Merchandise Value and Patronage Intentions , 2002 .

[13]  P. Conceição,et al.  Innovative science and technology commercialization strategies at 3M: a case study , 2002 .

[14]  Subhashish Samaddar,et al.  An analysis of interorganizational resource sharing decisions in collaborative knowledge creation , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[15]  Robert L. Carraway,et al.  Making the transition to collaborative buyer–seller relationships: An emerging framework , 2006 .

[16]  C. Fornell,et al.  Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. , 1981 .

[17]  Jie Yang,et al.  The contingency value of knowledge in new product creativity , 2007, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[18]  I. Nonaka,et al.  A firm as a knowledge-creating entity: a new perspective on the theory of the firm , 2000 .

[19]  Albert H. Segars,et al.  Knowledge Management: An Organizational Capabilities Perspective , 2001, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Allen C. Bluedorn,et al.  The relationship between corporate entrepreneurship and strategic management , 1999 .

[21]  G. Krogh Care in Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[22]  Georg von Krogh,et al.  Enabling Knowledge Creation: How to Unlock the Mystery of Tacit Knowledge and Release the Power of Innovation , 2000 .

[23]  Will Mitchell,et al.  Incumbents' use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry , 1992 .

[24]  Avan R. Jassawalla,et al.  An Examination of Collaboration in High‐Technology New Product Development Processes , 1998 .

[25]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Total systems intervention: A research program , 1992 .

[26]  Mark S. Litwin,et al.  How to Measure Survey Reliability and Validity , 1995 .

[27]  Jorge F. S. Gomes,et al.  Critical success factors for cross‐functional teamwork in new product development , 2000 .

[28]  I. Nonaka,et al.  How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation , 1995 .

[29]  Wm. E. Souder,et al.  A guide to the best technology-transfer practices , 1990 .

[30]  David V. Gibson,et al.  R & D collaboration on trial , 1994 .

[31]  John P. Glaser Leading Through Collaboration: Guiding Groups to Productive Solutions , 2004 .

[32]  I. Nonaka,et al.  The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation , 1998 .

[33]  Matthew A. Waller,et al.  LATENT VARIABLES IN BUSINESS LOGISTICS RESEARCH: SCALE DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION / , 1994 .

[34]  Eric M. Olson,et al.  Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: Implications for project performance , 2001 .

[35]  Elizabeth Lank Collaborative Advantage : How Organizations Win by Working Together , 2005 .