The modulation transfer function. A simplified procedure for computer-aided quality evaluation in mammography.

Regardless of the indisputable benefits of the modulation transfer function (MTF) method to radiographic image quality evaluation, most radiologists simply do not have the means for utilizing it due to the experimental difficulties in its application to mammography practice. One of the most significant difficulties for radiological departments is having the necessary equipment to digitize slit radiographic images-a microdensitometer, for example-to be used in quality assurance programs. Therefore, the authors propose the application of the transfer function method for quality evaluation of mammography equipment using a different procedure. This procedure is based on the calculation of the MTF from a simulated line spread function derived from the focal-spot projection. Since this technique does not need digitized images and can be performed on a PC, it will allow the use of the transfer function method in quality control programs without the constraints associated with the complexity of classical experimental procedures.

[1]  A E Burgess.  Focal spots: II. Models. , 1977, Investigative radiology.

[2]  Y Pochon,et al.  Objective assessment of mammography systems. Part I: Method. , 1985, Radiology.

[3]  Burgess Ae.  Focal spots: I. MTF separability. , 1977 .

[4]  K Rossmann,et al.  New device for accurate measurement of the x-ray intensity distribution of x-ray tube focal spots. , 1975, Medical physics.

[5]  H Schiabel,et al.  The need for investigating the optical transfer functions in several field orientations for nonisotropic radiographic systems. , 1993, Medical physics.

[6]  A. Kuntke.  On the determination of roentgen tube focal spot sizes by pin-hole camera roentgenography. , 1957, Acta radiologica.

[7]  C B Caldwell,et al.  Development of an anthropomorphic breast phantom. , 1990, Medical physics.

[8]  C E Metz,et al.  Transfer function analysis of radiographic imaging systems. , 1979, Physics in medicine and biology.

[9]  A E Burgess.  Interpretation of star test pattern images. , 1977, Medical physics.

[10]  K. Karila.  Quality control of mammographic equipment: a 5-year follow-up. , 1988, The British journal of radiology.

[11]  L N Loo,et al.  X-ray tube focal spot sizes: comprehensive studies of their measurement and effect of measured size in angiography. , 1982, Radiology.

[12]  Kunio Doi,et al.  Evaluation Of Focal Spot Distribution By Rms Value And Its Effect On Blood Vessel Imaging In Angiography , 1975, Other Conferences.

[13]  J E Gray,et al.  Characterization of the imaging properties of x-ray focal spots. , 1976, Applied optics.

[14]  E L Nickoloff,et al.  Mammographic resolution: influence of focal spot intensity distribution and geometry. , 1990, Medical physics.

[15]  J Law.  Measurement of focal spot size in mammography X-ray tubes. , 1993, The British journal of radiology.

[16]  K. Rossmann.  Point spread-function, line spread-function, and modulation transfer function. Tools for the study of imaging systems. , 1969, Radiology.

[17]  E. Muntz,et al.  Optimization of electrostatic imaging systems for minimum patient dose or minimum exposure in mammography. , 1978, Radiology.

[18]  J E Gray,et al.  Focal-spot measurement: comparison of slit, pinhole, and star resolution pattern techniques. , 1987, Radiology.

[19]  Burgess Ae.  Focal spots: III. Field characteristics. , 1977 .

[20]  K Doi.  Field characteristics of geometric unsharpness due to the x-ray tube focal spot. , 1977, Medical physics.

[21]  Y Pochon,et al.  Objective assessment of mammography systems. Part II: Implementation. , 1985, Radiology.