Metabolism of Reduced Methylated Sulfur Compounds in Anaerobic Sediments and by a Pure Culture of an Estuarine Methanogen

Addition of dimethylsulfide (DMS), dimethyldisulfide (DMDS), or methane thiol (MSH) to a diversity of anoxic aquatic sediments (e.g., fresh water, estuarine, alkaline/hypersaline) stimulated methane production. The yield of methane recovered from DMS was often 52 to 63%, although high concentrations of DMS (as well as MSH and DMDS) inhibited methanogenesis in some types of sediments. Production of methane from these reduced methylated sulfur compounds was blocked by 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid. Sulfate did not influence the metabolism of millimolar levels of DMS, DMDS, or MSH added to sediments. However, when DMS was added at ∼2-μM levels as [14C]DMS, metabolism by sediments resulted in a 14CH4/14CO2 ratio of only 0.06. Addition of molybdate increased the ratio to 1.8, while 2-bromoethanesulfonic acid decreased it to 0, but did not block 14CO2 production. These results indicate the methanogens and sulfate reducers compete for DMS when it is present at low concentrations; however, at high concentrations, DMS is a “noncompetitive” substrate for methanogens. Metabolism of DMS by sediments resulted in the appearance of MSH as a transient intermediate. A pure culture of an obligately methylotrophic estuarine methanogen was isolated which was capable of growth on DMS. Metabolism of DMS by the culture also resulted in the transient appearance of MSH, but the organism could grow on neither MSH nor DMDS. The culture metabolized [14C]-DMS to yield a 14CH4/14CO2 ratio of ∼2.8. Reduced methylated sulfur compounds represent a new class of substrates for methanogens and may be potential precursors of methane in a variety of aquatic habitats.

[1]  M. Andreae.  Dimethylsulfide in the water column and the sediment porewaters of the Peru upwelling area1 , 1985 .

[2]  B. Peterson,et al.  Contribution of gaseous sulphur from salt marshes to the global sulphur cycle , 1984, Nature.

[3]  B. L. Howes,et al.  Dimethyl sulphide in a stratified coastal salt pond , 1984, Nature.

[4]  Y. Kharaka,et al.  Hydrogeochemistry of Big Soda Lake, Nevada: An alkaline meromictic desert lake , 1984 .

[5]  M. Andreae,et al.  Dimethyl Sulfide in the Surface Ocean and the Marine Atmosphere: A Global View , 1983, Science.

[6]  R. Oremland.  Hydrogen Metabolism by Decomposing Cyanobacterial Aggregates in Big Soda Lake, Nevada , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[7]  K. Sowers,et al.  Isolation and Characterization of a Methylotrophic Marine Methanogen, Methanococcoides methylutens gen. nov., sp. nov , 1983, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[8]  M. Andreae,et al.  The flux of dimethylsulfide from the oceans to the atmosphere , 1982 .

[9]  R. Oremland,et al.  Methanogenesis in Big Soda Lake, Nevada: an Alkaline, Moderately Hypersaline Desert Lake , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[10]  R. Oremland.  Microbial Formation of Ethane in Anoxic Estuarine Sediments , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[11]  A. Zehnder,et al.  Anaerobic Oxidation of Acetylene by Estuarine Sediments and Enrichment Cultures , 1981, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[12]  C. Woese,et al.  Methanogens: reevaluation of a unique biological group , 1979, Microbiological reviews.

[13]  R. Gunsalus,et al.  Preparation of coenzyme M analogues and their activity in the methyl coenzyme M reductase system of Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum. , 1978, Biochemistry.

[14]  S. Zinder,et al.  Production of methane and carbon dioxode from methane thiol and dimethyl sulphide by anaerobic lake sediments , 1978, Nature.

[15]  B. F. Taylor,et al.  Sulfate reduction and methanogenesis in marine sediments , 1978 .

[16]  S. Zinder,et al.  Methane, Carbon Dioxide, and Hydrogen Sulfide Production from the Terminal Methiol Group of Methionine by Anaerobic Lake Sediments , 1978, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[17]  S. Zinder,et al.  Production of volatile sulfur compounds during the decomposition of algal mats , 1977, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[18]  T C Stadtman,et al.  Methanococcus vannielii: culture and effects of selenium and tungsten on growth , 1977, Journal of bacteriology.

[19]  J. Hobbie,et al.  Use of nuclepore filters for counting bacteria by fluorescence microscopy , 1977, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[20]  P. Dugan,et al.  Tentative Identification of Methanogenic Bacteria by Fluorescence Microscopy , 1977, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[21]  J. Lewis,et al.  Evolution of volatile sulfur-containing compounds from decomposition of crucifers in soil , 1970 .

[22]  D. Williams,et al.  The evaluation of media used to enumerate sulphate reducing bacteria. , 1970, The Journal of applied bacteriology.

[23]  Meinrat O. Andreae,et al.  Biosynthesis of dimethylsulfide and dimethylpropiothetin by Hymenomonas carterae in relation to sulfur source and salinity variations , 1985 .

[24]  B. L. Howes,et al.  Effects of sampling technique on measurements of porewater constituents in salt marsh sediments1 , 1985 .

[25]  G. King.  Utilization of hydrogen, acetate, and “noncompetitive”; substrates by methanogenic bacteria in marine sediments , 1984 .

[26]  R. Oremland,et al.  Methanogenesis and sulfate reduction: competitive and noncompetitive substrates in estuarine sediments. , 1982, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[27]  K. Fiebig,et al.  Utilization of trimethylamine and other N-methyl compounds for growth and methane formation by Methanosarcina barkeri. , 1979, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[28]  R. C. Weast.  CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics , 1973 .