Anticipatory capacity: Leveraging model-based approaches to design systems for dynamic futures

The paper presents a vision for enhancing anticipatory capacity of engineering organizations, with a goal of enabling the design of systems that can deliver sustained value as the world changes. Anticipatory capacity is the capacity of an organization to continuously develop and apply knowledge acquired through a structured approach to anticipate changing scenarios as needs and context change over time, While anticipation has always had a role in designing systems; the availability of model-based methods has significant implications. Anticipatory capacity extends from three key elements: competencies, methods, and a model-based environment. The paper discusses ongoing and planned research in support of establishing anticipatory capacity in organizations by leveraging the opportunities of model-based engineering.

[1]  Stefan H. Thomke,et al.  Experimentation Matters: Unlocking the Potential of New Technologies for Innovation , 2003 .

[2]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  11.4.3 The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm , 2005 .

[3]  Tom Ritchey Scenario Development and Risk Management Using Morphological Field Analysis: Research in Progress , 1997, ECIS.

[4]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  The Tradespace Exploration Paradigm , 2005 .

[5]  Katerina Alexiou,et al.  Towards an anticipatory view of design , 2007 .

[6]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  A Framework for Tradespace Exploration of Systems of Systems , 2008 .

[7]  Chun Wei Choo Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning , 2001, Inf. Res..

[8]  Ron Chrisley Some foundational issues concerning anticipatory systems , 2002 .

[9]  Yoram Reich,et al.  SOS – subjective objective system for generating optimal product concepts , 2005 .

[10]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Managing unarticulated value : changeability in multi-attribute tradespace exploration , 2006 .

[11]  D.H. Rhodes,et al.  Architecting Systems for Value Robustness: Research Motivations and Progress , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[12]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Responsive Systems Comparison Method: Case Study in Assessing Future Designs in the Presence of Change , 2008 .

[13]  Adam M. Ross,et al.  11.1.1 Using Natural Value-Centric Time Scales for Conceptualizing System Timelines through Epoch-Era Analysis , 2008 .

[14]  Daniel E. Hastings,et al.  Defining changeability: Reconciling flexibility, adaptability, scalability, modifiability, and robustness for maintaining system lifecycle value , 2008 .

[15]  C.T. Lamb,et al.  Empirical Research on Systems Thinking and Practice in the Engineering Enterprise , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.

[16]  Adam Michael Ross,et al.  Multi-attribute tradespace exploration with concurrent design as a value-centric framework for space system architecture and design , 2003 .

[17]  C.T. Lamb,et al.  Systems Thinking as an Emergent Team Property: Ongoing research into the enablers and barriers to team-level systems thinking , 2008, 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference.