When Even a Robot Tutor Zooms: A Study of Embodiment, Attitudes, and Impressions
暂无分享,去创建一个
Junko Kanero | Cansu Oranç | Aylin C. Küntay | Tilbe Göksun | Elif Tutku Tunalı | T. Göksun | J. Kanero | A. Küntay | C. Oranç | Junko Kanero | Cansu Oranç
[1] Brian Scassellati,et al. Social robots for education: A review , 2018, Science Robotics.
[2] E. Hoff. Interpreting the early language trajectories of children from low-SES and language minority homes: implications for closing achievement gaps. , 2013, Developmental psychology.
[3] Tony Belpaeme,et al. Comparing Robot Embodiments in a Guided Discovery Learning Interaction with Children , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[4] Nicole C. Krämer,et al. Robots or Agents - Neither Helps You More or Less During Second Language Acquisition - Experimental Study on the Effects of Embodiment and Type of Speech Output on Evaluation and Alignment , 2016, IVA.
[5] Khiet P. Truong,et al. Selecting the right robot: Influence of user attitude, robot sociability and embodiment on user preferences , 2015, 2015 24th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN).
[6] Hatice Kose-Bagci,et al. The Effect of Embodiment in Sign Language Tutoring with Assistive Humanoid Robots , 2015, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[7] Jacques Mehler,et al. Cognitive gains in 7-month-old bilingual infants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[8] Mohamed Chetouani,et al. Towards Engagement Models that Consider Individual Factors in HRI: On the Relation of Extroversion and Negative Attitude Towards Robots to Gaze and Speech During a Human–Robot Assembly Task , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[9] J. Kanero,et al. Social robots for early language learning: Current evidence and future directionsijdschrift Approachvan dencal practice: A pilot study.uali , 2018 .
[10] J. Astington,et al. Language and theory of mind: meta-analysis of the relation between language ability and false-belief understanding. , 2007, Child development.
[11] C. Bartneck,et al. A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction , 2004, RO-MAN 2004. 13th IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (IEEE Catalog No.04TH8759).
[12] Ali Meghdari,et al. The Impact of Social Robotics on L2 Learners’ Anxiety and Attitude in English Vocabulary Acquisition , 2015, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.
[13] Returns to Foreign Language Skills in a Developing Country: The Case of Turkey , 2015 .
[14] Adriana Tapus,et al. Impact of sensory preferences of individuals with autism on the recognition of emotions expressed by two robots, an avatar, and a human , 2016, Autonomous Robots.
[15] Anja Gampe,et al. Communicative and social consequences of interactions with voice assistants , 2020, Comput. Hum. Behav..
[16] Rolf Pfeifer,et al. Understanding intelligence , 2020, Inequality by Design.
[17] E. Horwitz,et al. Foreign Language Classroom Anxiety , 1986 .
[18] Jeonghye Han,et al. Comparative Study on the Educational Use of Home Robots for Children , 2008, J. Inf. Process. Syst..
[19] Anne Marie Piper,et al. Hey Google, Do Unicorns Exist?: Conversational Agents as a Path to Answers to Children's Questions , 2019, IDC.
[20] S. Kotz,et al. How relevant is social interaction in second language learning? , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[21] F. Craik,et al. Bilingualism, aging, and cognitive control: evidence from the Simon task. , 2004, Psychology and aging.
[22] Janine Willis,et al. First Impressions , 2006, Psychological science.
[23] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[24] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[25] B. Scassellati,et al. Social eye gaze in human-robot interaction , 2017, J. Hum. Robot Interact..
[26] Junko Kanero,et al. Six Principles of Language Development: Implications for Second Language Learners , 2014, Developmental neuropsychology.
[27] T. Jaeger,et al. Categorical Data Analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards Logit Mixed Models. , 2008, Journal of memory and language.
[28] Leila Takayama,et al. Influences on proxemic behaviors in human-robot interaction , 2009, 2009 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.
[29] Tatsuya Nomura,et al. Experimental investigation into influence of negative attitudes toward robots on human–robot interaction , 2006, AI & SOCIETY.
[30] P. Kuhl,et al. Social Interaction and Language Acquisition , 2017 .
[31] Jamy Li,et al. The benefit of being physically present: A survey of experimental works comparing copresent robots, telepresent robots and virtual agents , 2015, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..
[32] Bilge Mutlu,et al. Embodiment in Socially Interactive Robots , 2019, Found. Trends Robotics.
[33] T. Göksun,et al. Are Tutor Robots for Everyone? The Influence of Attitudes, Anxiety, and Personality on Robot-Led Language Learning , 2021, International Journal of Social Robotics.
[34] G. Tarcan Kumkale,et al. Individual differences in willingness to become an organ donor: A decision tree approach to reasoned action , 2013 .
[35] Iris Groher,et al. Intelligent virtual agents as language trainers facilitate multilingualism , 2014, Front. Psychol..
[36] Brian Scassellati,et al. The Physical Presence of a Robot Tutor Increases Cognitive Learning Gains , 2012, CogSci.
[37] Vivian Zayas,et al. Impressions Based on a Portrait Predict, 1-Month Later, Impressions Following a Live Interaction , 2017 .
[38] A Turkish Version of Foreign Language Anxiety Scale: Reliability and Validity , 2016 .