Intercomparison of Methods for Calculating Potential Evaporation in Regional and Global Water Balance Models

Five methods (Thornthwaite, Hamon, Jensen-Haise, Turc, and Penman) for estimating potential evaporation for a reference surface (PEr) were compared to four methods (Priestley-Taylor, McNaughton-Black, Penman-Monteith, and Shuttleworth-Wallace) for estimating surface-dependent potential evaporation (PEs) using three cover types at each of seven locations from Fairbanks, Alaska, to San Juan, Puerto Rico. For annual PE the PEs methods generally agreed with the PEr methods, but for many locations, differences among methods were hundreds of millimeters per year. No methods were consistently low or high. Three of the PEs methods depend strongly on maximum leaf conductance, for which Korner [1994] provided satisfactory values by cover type. Potential interception ∥PEi∥ can only be estimated appropriately for all cover types by the Shuttleworth-Wallace method. Use of 5-day or monthly input data did not greatly degrade results, so use of monthly data to generate PE estimates appears warranted in global water balance models.

[1]  W. Brutsaert.  Evaporation into the atmosphere , 1982 .

[2]  Terry A. Howell,et al.  Lysimetric evaluation of daily potential evapotranspiration models for grain sorghum , 1991 .

[3]  A. Lindroth.  Potential Evaporation – A Matter of Definition , 1993 .

[4]  John L. Monteith,et al.  A four-layer model for the heat budget of homogeneous land surfaces , 1988 .

[5]  N. Rosenberg,et al.  Sensitivity of some potential evapotranspiration estimation methods to climate change , 1993 .

[6]  E. Rastetter,et al.  Continental scale models of water balance and fluvial transport: An application to South America , 1989 .

[7]  S Jeevanandareddy,et al.  Sensitivity of some potential evapotranspiration estimation methods to climate change , 1995 .

[8]  Nader Katerji,et al.  Some plant factors controlling evapotranspiration , 1991 .

[9]  Ann Henderson-Sellers,et al.  Modelling tropical deforestation: A study of GCM land-surface parametrizations , 1988 .

[10]  Robert J. Gurney,et al.  The theoretical relationship between foliage temperature and canopy resistance in sparse crops , 1990 .

[11]  J. Aber,et al.  A strategy for the regional analysis of the effects of physical and chemical climate change on biogeochemical cycles in northeastern (U.S.) forests , 1993 .

[12]  K. I. Kondratʹev.  Radiation in the atmosphere , 1969 .

[13]  W. James Shuttleworth,et al.  Evaporation Models in Hydrology , 1991 .

[14]  C. Priestley,et al.  On the Assessment of Surface Heat Flux and Evaporation Using Large-Scale Parameters , 1972 .

[15]  J. Stewart.  Modelling surface conductance of pine forest , 1988 .

[16]  C. W. Thornthwaite.  An approach toward a rational classification of climate. , 1948 .

[17]  H. E. Jobson.  Evaporation Into the Atmosphere: Theory, History, and Applications , 1982 .

[18]  Potential evaporation: a matter of definition. Commentary , 1993 .

[19]  K. G. McNaughton,et al.  A study of evapotranspiration from a Douglas fir forest using the energy balance approach , 1973 .

[20]  P. Jarvis.  The Interpretation of the Variations in Leaf Water Potential and Stomatal Conductance Found in Canopies in the Field , 1976 .

[21]  W. Brutsaert,et al.  A comparison of several evaporation equations , 1992 .

[22]  P. A. Sheppard,et al.  Long-wave radiation from clear skies , 1964 .

[23]  H. L. Penman.  Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass , 1948, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[24]  C. B. Tanner,et al.  Potential evapotranspiration estimates by the approximate energy balance method of Penman , 1960 .

[25]  C. Körner,et al.  Leaf Diffusive Conductances in the Major Vegetation Types of the Globe , 1995 .

[26]  Gene E. Likens,et al.  The Hubbard Brook Ecosystem Study: Forest Biomass and Production , 1974 .