Multiobjective optimization method for distribution system configuration using Pareto optimal solution

A distribution network has a huge number of configuration candidates because the network configuration is determined by the states of many sectionalizing switches (opened or closed) installed in terms of keeping power quality, reliability, and so on. Since the feeder current and voltage depend on the network configuration, the distribution loss, voltage imbalance, and bank efficiency can be controlled by changing the states of these switches. In addition, feeder currents and voltages change in response to the outputs of distributed generators (DGs) such as photovoltaic generation systems, wind turbine generation systems, and so on, that are connected to the feeder. Recently, the total number of DGs connected to distribution networks has increased drastically. Therefore, many configuration candidates of distribution networks must be evaluated multiply from various viewpoints such as distribution loss, voltage imbalance, bank efficiency, and so on, considering the power supply from the connected DGs. In this paper, the authors propose a multiobjective optimization method from three evaluation viewpoints, (1) distribution loss, (2) voltage imbalance, and (3) bank efficiency, using Pareto optimal solutions. In the proposed method, after several high-ranking candidates with small distribution loss are extracted by combinatorial optimization, each candidate is evaluated from the viewpoints of voltage imbalance and bank efficiency using the Pareto optimal solution, after which the minimum-loss configuration is chosen as the best configuration among these solutions. Numerical simulations were performed for a real-scale system model consisting of 72 distribution feeders and 234 sectionalizing switches in order to examine the validity of the proposed method. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Electron Comm Jpn, 94(1): 7–16, 2011; Published online in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/ecj.10271

[1]  Ying-Tung Hsiao,et al.  Multiobjective evolution programming method for feeder reconfiguration , 2004 .

[2]  I. Drezga,et al.  A heuristic nonlinear constructive method for distribution system reconfiguration , 1999 .

[3]  Jin-Cheng Wang,et al.  An efficient algorithm for real-time network reconfiguration in large scale unbalanced distribution systems , 1995 .

[4]  V. Parada,et al.  Optimization of electrical distribution feeders using simulated annealing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery.

[5]  J. Matsuki,et al.  Loss minimum configuration of distribution system considering N-1 security of dispersed generators , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[6]  Koichi Nara,et al.  Method for Loss Minimum Re-configuration Problem of Distribution System by Tabu Search , 2003 .

[7]  Yasuhiro Hayashi,et al.  A Simple Evaluation Method for Annual CO 2 Emissions Reduced by Distribution Loss Minimization , 2007 .

[8]  Yasuhiro Hayashi,et al.  Determination Method of Loss-Minimum Configuration with Mathematical Optimality in a Three Sectionalized and Three Connected Distribution Feeder Network , 2006 .

[9]  Hiroaki Matsuda,et al.  Establishment of a standard analytical model of distribution network with distributed generators and development of multi evaluation method for network configuration candidates , 2006 .

[10]  M. Kitagawa,et al.  Implementation of genetic algorithm for distribution systems loss minimum re-configuration , 1992 .

[11]  S. S. Venkata,et al.  An expert system operational aid for restoration and loss reduction of distribution systems , 1988 .

[12]  R. Taleski,et al.  Distribution network reconfiguration for energy loss reduction , 1997 .

[13]  N. Bretas,et al.  Main chain representation for evolutionary algorithms applied to distribution system reconfiguration , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.