An integrated Shannon entropy and TOPSIS for product design concept evaluation based on bijective soft set

This work addresses the problem of concept evaluation in uncertain environments of early design stages, with the help of the proposed integrated method involving bijective soft sets, Shannon entropy and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS). The application of soft set theory in the domain of product design and development is still not being efficiently utilised by previous works. Therefore, the benefit of soft set theory to define the attributes of an object through any type of approximations is used to deal with qualitative description of design criteria, by designers, and the linguistic requirements of customers. Bijective soft sets help the designers to effectively map individual customer requirements to the generated design concepts. With the help of Shannon entropy, customers’ preferences among the identified needs are captured in the new product development process, thus, improving the overall effectiveness of the concept evaluation process. This work considers concept evaluation process as a group multiple criteria decision making problem where, design specifications and customer requirements in qualitative form are first captured by using soft set theory and Shannon entropy and then, this information is incorporated in the framework of TOPSIS to identify the best concept in the evaluation process. The developed integrated method for concept evaluation process is validated with the help of a design illustration, which shows that soft set theory can serve as an effective tool for designers and researchers to reduce the imprecise and vague content of early design stages.

[1]  Naim Çagman,et al.  Soft matrix theory and its decision making , 2010, Comput. Math. Appl..

[2]  Li Pheng Khoo,et al.  A rough set enhanced fuzzy approach to quality function deployment , 2008 .

[3]  Zaifang Zhang,et al.  A new integrated design concept evaluation approach based on vague sets , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[4]  Takeo Kanade,et al.  Maximum Entropy for Collaborative Filtering , 2004, UAI.

[5]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  A two phase multi-attribute decision-making approach for new product introduction , 2007, Inf. Sci..

[6]  Liqun Gao,et al.  Letter to the editor: Comment on A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision making problems , 2009 .

[7]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  A mathematical theory of communication , 1948, MOCO.

[8]  P. K. Kannan,et al.  A decision support system for product design selection: A generalized purchase modeling approach , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[9]  M. Sayadi,et al.  Extension of VIKOR method for decision making problem with interval numbers , 2009 .

[10]  Xia Zhang,et al.  The bijective soft set with its operations , 2010, Comput. Math. Appl..

[11]  Chin-Tsai Lin,et al.  Using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process to evaluate service performance of a travel intermediary , 2009 .

[12]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  A Strategy for Managing Customer-oriented Product Design , 2006, Concurr. Eng. Res. Appl..

[13]  J Wang,et al.  A design—decision support framework for evaluation of design options/proposals using a composite structure methodology based on the approximate reasoning approach and the evidential reasoning method , 2003 .

[14]  A. R. Roy,et al.  An application of soft sets in a decision making problem , 2002 .

[15]  Andrea Hemetsberger,et al.  INTEGRATING EXPERT CUSTOMERS IN NEW PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT IN INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS - VIRTUAL ROUTES TO SUCCESS , 2017 .

[16]  Pabitra Kumar Maji,et al.  FUZZY SOFT SETS , 2001 .

[17]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  An integrated approach to evaluating conceptual design alternatives in a new product development environment , 2005 .

[18]  A. M. King,et al.  Development of a Methodology for Concept Selection in Flexible Design Strategies , 1999 .

[19]  G. D. Silveira,et al.  Mass customization: A method for market segmentation and choice menu design , 2008 .

[20]  Puneet Tandon,et al.  Product design concept evaluation using rough sets and VIKOR method , 2016, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[21]  D. Molodtsov Soft set theory—First results , 1999 .

[22]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  Consumer Cocreation in New Product Development , 2010 .

[24]  Kurt Matzler,et al.  How to make product development projects more successful by integrating Kano's model of customer satisfaction into quality function deployment , 1998 .

[25]  Ming-Chyuan Lin,et al.  Using AHP and TOPSIS approaches in customer-driven product design process , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[26]  A. R. Roy,et al.  A fuzzy soft set theoretic approach to decision making problems , 2007 .

[27]  Zhi Kong,et al.  Application of fuzzy soft set in decision making problems based on grey theory , 2011, J. Comput. Appl. Math..

[28]  Ting-Yu Chen,et al.  The interval-valued fuzzy TOPSIS method and experimental analysis , 2008, Fuzzy Sets Syst..

[29]  Chih-Hsuan Wang,et al.  Outlier identification and market segmentation using kernel-based clustering techniques , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[30]  Graham Green Towards integrated design evaluation: Validation of models , 2000 .

[31]  Zeki Ayağ,et al.  A fuzzy AHP-based simulation approach to concept evaluation in a NPD environment , 2005 .

[32]  Z. Ayağ,et al.  An analytic network process-based approach to concept evaluation in a new product development environment , 2007 .

[33]  Kouroush Jenab,et al.  A conceptual design selection model considering conflict resolution , 2013 .

[34]  Ching-Lai Hwang,et al.  Methods for Multiple Attribute Decision Making , 1981 .

[35]  Tien-Chin Wang,et al.  Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Naim Çagman,et al.  Soft set theory and uni-int decision making , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Zaifang Zhang,et al.  A new integrated decision-making approach for design alternative selection for supporting complex product development , 2009, Int. J. Comput. Integr. Manuf..

[38]  Wei Chen,et al.  An integrated computational intelligence approach to product concept generation and evaluation , 2006 .

[39]  Yan Zou,et al.  Data analysis approaches of soft sets under incomplete information , 2008, Knowl. Based Syst..

[40]  Christoph Fuchs,et al.  Customer Empowerment in New Product Development , 2011 .

[41]  Wenyan Song,et al.  An integrated rough number-based approach to design concept evaluation under subjective environments , 2013 .

[42]  Diyar Akay,et al.  Conceptual design evaluation using interval type-2 fuzzy information axiom , 2011, Comput. Ind..

[43]  Mustafa Mat Deris,et al.  A soft set approach for association rules mining , 2011, Knowl. Based Syst..

[44]  Jin Qi,et al.  An integrated AHP and VIKOR for design concept evaluation based on rough number , 2015, Adv. Eng. Informatics.

[45]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  An Evidential-Reasoning-Interval-Based Method for New Product Design Assessment , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[46]  Zhi Xiao,et al.  A combined forecasting approach based on fuzzy soft sets , 2009 .