Effect of tissue heterogeneity on an in vivo range verification technique for proton therapy

It was proposed recently that time-resolved dose measurements during proton therapy treatment by passively scattered beams may be used for in vivo range verification. The method was shown to work accurately in a water tank. In this paper, we further evaluated the potential of the method for more clinically relevant situations where proton beams must pass through regions with significant tissue heterogeneities. Specifically, we considered prostate treatment where the use of anterior or anterior- oblique fields was recently proposed in order to reduce rectal dose by taking advantage of the sharp distal fall-off of the Bragg peak. These beam portals pass through various parts of pubic bone and potential air cavities in the bladder and bowels. Using blocks of materials with densities equivalent to bone, air, etc, arranged in the water tank in relevant configurations, we tested the robustness of the method against range shifting and range mixing. In the former, the beam range is changed uniformly by changes in tissue density in the beam path, while in the latter, variations in tissue heterogeneities across the beam cross section causes the mixing of beam energies downstream, as often occurs when the beam travels along the interface of materials with significantly different densities. We demonstrated that in the region of interest, the method can measure water-equivalent path length with accuracy better than ±0.5 mm for pure range shifting and still reasonable accuracy for range mixing between close beam energies. In situations with range mixing between significantly different beam energies, the dose rate profiles may be simulated for verifying the beam range. We also found that the above performances can be obtained with very small amount of dose (<0.5 cGy), if silicon diodes are used as detectors. This makes the method suitable for in vivo range verification prior to each treatment delivery.

[1]  Shikui Tang,et al.  Improvement of prostate treatment by anterior proton fields. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  J. Efstathiou,et al.  Anterior and Anterior Oblique Fields Improve Proton Prostate Treatment , 2010 .

[3]  Ethan Cascio,et al.  Investigation of an implantable dosimeter for single-point water equivalent path length verification in proton therapy. , 2010, Medical physics.

[4]  E. Bentefour,et al.  The Use of Diodes as Dose and Fluence Probes in the Experimental Beamline at the Francis H. Burr Proton Therapy Center , 2010, 2011 IEEE Radiation Effects Data Workshop.

[5]  D. Prieels,et al.  SU-GG-T-471: Towards Range Guided Prostate Treatment Using an AP Field , 2010 .

[6]  J. Efstathiou,et al.  SU‐GG‐T‐479: Anterior Fields Improve Rectal Sparing in Prostate Treatment by Proton Therapy , 2010 .

[7]  Pedro Andreo,et al.  On the clinical spatial resolution achievable with protons and heavier charged particle radiotherapy beams , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  D. Prieels,et al.  SU‐FF‐T‐220: In Vivo Proton Range Verification/correction for Safe Anterior‐Posterior Field Treatment of Prostate Cancer , 2009 .

[9]  A. Trofimov,et al.  Proton-beam vs intensity-modulated radiation therapy. Which is best for treating prostate cancer? , 2008, Oncology.

[10]  Hsiao-Ming Lu,et al.  A potential method for in vivo range verification in proton therapy treatment , 2008, Physics in medicine and biology.

[11]  Alexei Trofimov,et al.  Radiotherapy treatment of early-stage prostate cancer with IMRT and protons: a treatment planning comparison. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  Katia Parodi,et al.  Patient study of in vivo verification of beam delivery and range, using positron emission tomography and computed tomography imaging after proton therapy. , 2007, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Hsiao-Ming Lu,et al.  Optimization of current modulation function for proton spread-out Bragg peak fields. , 2006, Medical physics.

[14]  M Goitein,et al.  Compensating for heterogeneities in proton radiation therapy. , 1984, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  G. Chen,et al.  Measurements and calculations of the influence of thin inhomogeneities on charged particle beams. , 1978, Medical physics.